Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Pain Pract ; 17(8): 990-998, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28066970

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The development and implementation of a pharmacist-led patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) dosing service in a large academic institution are described. SUMMARY: To improve pain management at our institution and expand pharmacy clinical services, a pharmacist-led PCA dosing service was developed and implemented. The service is modeled after established antimicrobial and anticoagulation dosing services at our institution. A core group of pharmacists (service leaders) and a pain physician champion developed a policy and guideline and designed electronic medical record (EMR) tools to support the service. Pharmacists were trained by the service leaders to manage acute pain with fentanyl, hydromorphone, or morphine PCA therapy. Cultural and operational barriers to service implementation were identified and resolved. CONCLUSION: After implementation of the pharmacist-led PCA dosing service, pharmacists at our institution provide PCA pain management services as part of our pharmacy department's standard practice.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pharmacists , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Humans , Pharmacy Service, Hospital
2.
J Pharm Pract ; 25(5): 503-9, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23011962

ABSTRACT

Extended-release oral and transdermal opioids are increasingly being used for the management of chronic pain. Although the dosing intervals for these products were established through controlled clinical trials, expanded use of extended-release and transdermal dosage forms has resulted in awareness that a significant number of patients with chronic pain experience loss of baseline pain control prior to the next scheduled dose. End-of-dose failure (EDF) is the term used to describe this type of pain manifestation. By recognizing potential causes of EDF, strategies may be developed to overcome its occurrence to improve patients' pain control.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Breakthrough Pain/prevention & control , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Breakthrough Pain/epidemiology , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Prevalence
3.
Pharmacotherapy ; 27(12): 1611-8, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18041881

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of daptomycin compared with vancomycin on the clinical and economic outcomes in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center in Detroit, Michigan. PATIENTS: Fifty-three adult patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection who were treated with daptomycin and a matched cohort of 212 patients treated with vancomycin. INTERVENTION: Patients in the prospective arm received intravenous daptomycin 4 mg/kg every 24 hours for at least 3 days but not more than 14 days. Historical controls received at least 3 days of vancomycin dosed to achieve trough concentrations of 5-20 microg/ml. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes evaluated included blinded assessments of clinical resolution, duration of therapy, and costs. The most common diagnoses were cellulitis (31%), abscess (22%), and both cellulitis with abscess (37%). Microbiology differed significantly between groups, with S. aureus found in 27 patients (51%) in the daptomycin group and 167 patients (79%) in the vancomycin group and MRSA in 22 (42%) and 159 (75%), respectively (p<0.001). The proportions of patients with clinical improvement or resolution of their infections on days 3 and 5 were 90% versus 70% and 98% versus 81% in the daptomycin versus vancomycin groups, respectively (p<0.01 for both comparisons), and 100% at the end of therapy in both groups. Among patients with complete resolution of their infections (41 patients [77%] with daptomycin vs 89 patients [42%] with vancomycin, p<0.05), median duration of intravenous therapy was 4 and 7 days, respectively, (p<0.001), and hospital costs were $5027 and $7552 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving daptomycin achieved more rapid resolution of symptoms and clinical cure and had a decreased duration of inpatient therapy compared with those receiving vancomycin. This study suggests that daptomycin is a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Abscess/drug therapy , Abscess/economics , Abscess/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Cellulitis/drug therapy , Cellulitis/economics , Cellulitis/microbiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Daptomycin/economics , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Skin Diseases, Infectious/economics , Skin Diseases, Infectious/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/economics , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...