Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 131(5): 762-769, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630012

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To more accurately estimate the 2012 maternal mortality ratio for Texas using an enhanced method for identifying maternal deaths. METHODS: This population-based descriptive study used both data matching and record review to verify pregnancy or delivery within 42 days for 147 deaths with obstetric cause-of-death codes, and used data matching alone to identify additional maternal deaths within the same timeframe. Crude maternal mortality ratios were calculated for confirmed maternal deaths overall, by race and ethnicity, and by age. These maternal mortality ratios were compared with maternal mortality ratios computed using obstetric cause-of-death codes alone (standard method). RESULTS: Fifty-six maternal deaths were confirmed to have occurred during pregnancy or within 42 days postpartum. Using our enhanced method, the 2012 maternal mortality ratio for Texas was 14.6 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, less than half that obtained using the standard method (n=147). Approximately half (50.3%) of obstetric-coded deaths showed no evidence of pregnancy within 42 days, and a large majority of these incorrectly indicated pregnancy at the time of death. Insufficient information was available to determine pregnancy for 15 obstetric-coded deaths, which were excluded from the 2012 maternal mortality ratio estimate; however, had these deaths been included, the resulting maternal mortality ratio would still be significantly lower than that reported using the standard method. CONCLUSION: Relying solely on obstetric codes for identifying maternal deaths appears to be insufficient and can lead to inaccurate maternal mortality ratios. A method enhanced with data matching and record review yields more accurate ratios. Results likely have national implications, because miscoding of obstetric deaths with the standard method may affect the accuracy of other states' maternal mortality ratios.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Data Accuracy , Maternal Death , Maternal Mortality , Obstetrics , Pregnancy Complications/mortality , Adult , Female , Forms and Records Control , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Maternal Death/prevention & control , Maternal Death/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/methods , Obstetrics/standards , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Quality Improvement , Texas/epidemiology
4.
Am J Perinatol ; 34(6): 614-620, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27829266

ABSTRACT

A commentary on maternal mortality in Texas is provided in response to a 2016 article in Obstetrics & Gynecology by MacDorman et al. While the Texas Department of State Health Services and the Texas Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Task Force agree that maternal mortality increased sharply from 2010 to 2011, the percentage change or the magnitude of the increase in the maternal mortality rate in Texas differs depending on the statistical methods used to compute and display it. Methodologic challenges in identifying maternal death are also discussed, as well as risk factors and causes of maternal death in Texas. Finally, several state efforts currently underway to address maternal mortality in Texas are described.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Maternal Death/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality/trends , Models, Statistical , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Texas/epidemiology , Women's Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL