ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Whole blood (WB) resuscitation is increasingly used at trauma centers. Prior studies investigating outcomes in WB versus component-only (CO) resuscitation have been limited by small cohorts, low volumes of WB resuscitation, and unbalanced CO resuscitation. This study aimed to address these limitations using data from a high-volume Level I trauma center, which adopted a WB-first resuscitation paradigm in 2018. We hypothesized that the resuscitation method, WB or balanced CO, would have no impact on patient mortality. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults presenting as a trauma activation from July 2016 through July 2021 was performed. Receipt of 3 or more units of WB or packed red blood cells (RBC) within the first hour of resuscitation was required for inclusion. Patients were grouped into WB versus CO resuscitation and important clinical outcomes were compared. Mortality was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: There were 180 patients in the WB group and 170 patients in the CO group. Of the 180 WB patients, 110 (61%) received only WB during the first 24 hours. The WB group received a median of 5.0 units (IQR 4.0-8.0) of WB and CO group received a median of 6.0 units (IQR 4.0-11.8) of RBCs during the first 24 hours of resuscitation. In the CO group, median RBC/plasma and RBC/platelet ratios approximated 1:1:1. Groups were similar in clinicopathologic characteristics including age, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, and requirement for hemorrhage control interventions (WB 55% vs CO 59%, p = 0.60). Unadjusted survival was equivalent at 24 hours (p = 0.52) and 30 days (p = 0.70) between both groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. On multivariable Cox regression, WB resuscitation was not independently associated with improved survival after accounting for age, ISS, mechanism of injury, and receipt of hemorrhage control procedure (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.61-1.19, p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Balanced CO resuscitation is associated with similar mortality outcomes to that of WB based resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Therapeutic/Care Management.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) often require intensive care unit (ICU) admission until bleeding stability is demonstrated through interval head computed tomography (HCT). The brain injury guidelines (BIG) suggest a minimum 24-h ICU admission for severe patients (BIG 3) regardless of repeat CT stability. We sought to evaluate the rate of tICH expansion after an initial stable interval scan was obtained. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center was performed. All adult patients with tICH evaluated using BIG criteria were included. The primary endpoint was incidence of tICH expansion after initial stability on interval HCT performed at approximately 6 h. Secondary endpoints included time to tICH stability, frequency of neurosurgical intervention, and time to surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1517 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 1121 patients with repeat imaging, 288 (25.7%) experienced progression with 94.4% detected on the initial 6-h interval scan. Of all patients with initially stable repeat imaging (n = 833), progression occurred in 16 (1.9%) patients. Of these patients, 5 required neurosurgical intervention, 4 received increased monitoring, 2 transitioned to comfort measures and 5 had no change in management. The median time from initial scan to expansion in these patients was 42.2 h. Median time to surgical intervention after post-stability expansion was 102 h. CONCLUSION: Patients who demonstrate bleeding stability on first interval HCT after tICH rarely experience expansion. Consideration should be given to discharging patients from the ICU when initial interval HCT shows no progression.
