Two-dimensional (2D) placental ultrasound measurements - The correlation with placental volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

INTRODUCTION: Information about placental size in ongoing pregnancies may aid the identification of pregnancies with increased risk of adverse outcome. Placental volume can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, this method is not universally available in antenatal care. Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. Therefore, we studied whether simple two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound placental measurements were correlated with placental volume measured by MRI. METHODS: We examined a convenience sample of 104 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 27, using both ultrasound and MRI. The ultrasound measurements included placental length, width and thickness. Placental volume was measured using MRI. The correlation between each 2D placental ultrasound measurement and placental volume was estimated by applying Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Mean placental length was 17.2 cm (SD 2.1 cm), mean width was 14.7 cm (SD 2.1 cm), and mean thickness was 3.2 cm (SD 0.6 cm). Mean placental volume was 536 cm3 (SD 137 cm3). The 2D ultrasound measurements showed poor correlation with placental volume (placental length; r = 0.27, width; r = 0.37, and thickness r = 0.13). DISCUSSION: Simple 2D ultrasound measurements of the placenta were poorly correlated with placental volume and cannot be used as proximate measures of placental volume. Our finding may be explained by the large variation between pregnancies in intrauterine placental shape.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury and incontinence 15-23 years after vaginal delivery.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim was to study prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) after normal vaginal deliveries (NVD) and operative vaginal deliveries (OVD) with a subgroup analysis of forceps (FD) vs. vacuum deliveries (VD). The secondary aim was to study the association between OASIS and anal incontinence 15-23 years later. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study including 8137 primiparous women in Trondheim, Norway, from 1990 to 1997. The outcome measure was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for OASIS between delivery groups. A total of 1122 women responded to a postal questionnaire containing the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI) in 2013. The aOR for anal incontinence and the difference in CRADI score between women with and without OASIS were calculated. RESULTS: OASIS prevalence was 2% for NVD and 10% for OVD (10% FD, 9% VD). aOR for OASIS was 5.01 (95%CI 3.85-6.51) comparing OVD with NVD. There was no difference between FD and VD (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.67). FD was associated with higher risk of fourth degree perineal tear than VD (aOR 5.08, 95% CI 1.47-17.49). OASIS was associated with increased risk of leakage of well-formed (aOR 8.61, 95% CI 3.08-24.12) and loose stool (aOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.43-5.27) and higher CRADI score (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OVD was associated with increased risk of OASIS. FD was associated with higher risk of fourth degree perineal tear compared with VD. OASIS was associated with increased risk of anal incontinence and higher CRADI score 15-23 years later.