Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs.

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association's (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standard specifies methodology for evaluating the performance of small-animal PET scanners. The standard's goal is to enable comparison of different PET scanners over a wide range of technologies and geometries used. In this work, we discuss if the NEMA standard meets these goals and we point out potential flaws and improvements to the standard.For the evaluation of spatial resolution, the NEMA standard mandates the use of filtered backprojection reconstruction. This reconstruction method can introduce star-like artifacts for detectors with an anisotropic spatial resolution, usually caused by parallax error. These artifacts can then cause a strong dependence of the resulting spatial resolution on the size of the projection window in image space, whose size is not fully specified in the NEMA standard. If the PET ring has detectors which are perpendicular to a Cartesian axis, then the resolution along this axis will typically improve with larger projection windows.We show that the standard's equations for the estimation of the random rate for PET systems with intrinsic radioactivity are circular and not satisfiable. However, a modified version can still be used to determine an approximation of the random rates under the assumption of negligible random rates for small activities and a constant scatter fraction. We compare the resulting estimated random rates to random rates obtained using a delayed coincidence window and two methods based on the singles rates. While these methods give similar estimates, the estimation method based on the NEMA equations overestimates the random rates.In the NEMA standard's protocol for the evaluation of the sensitivity, the standard specifies to axially step a point source through the scanner and to take a different scan for each source position. Later, in the data analysis section, the standard does not specify clearly how the different scans have to be incorporated into the analysis, which can lead to unclear interpretations of publicized results.The standard's definition of the recovery coefficients in the image quality phantom includes the maximum activity in a region of interest, which causes a positive correlation of noise and recovery coefficients. This leads to an unintended trade-off between desired uniformity, which is negatively correlated with variance (i.e., noise), and recovery.With this work, we want to start a discussion on possible improvements in a next version of the NEMA NU-4 standard.

PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion IID PET/MRI insert based on the NEMA NU-4 standard.

The Hyperion IID PET insert is the first scanner using fully digital silicon photomultipliers for simultaneous PET/MR imaging of small animals up to rabbit size. In this work, we evaluate the PET performance based on the National Eletrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 4-2008 standard, whose standardized measurement protocols allow comparison of different small-animal PET scanners. The Hyperion IID small-animal PET/MR insert comprises three rings of 20 detector stacks with pixelated scintillator arrays with a crystal pitch of 1 mm, read out with digital silicon photomultipliers. The scanner has a large ring diameter of 209.6 mm and an axial field of view of 96.7 mm. We evaluated the spatial resolution, energy resolution, time resolution and sensitivity by scanning a 22Na point source. The count rates and scatter fractions were measured for a wide range of 18F activity inside a mouse-sized scatter phantom. We evaluated the image quality using the mouse-sized image quality phantom specified in the NEMA NU4 standard, filled with 18F. Additionally, we verified the in-vivo imaging capabilities by performing a simultaneous PET/MRI scan of a mouse injected with 18F-FDG. We processed all measurement data with an energy window of 250 keV to 625 keV and a coincidence time window of 2 ns. The filtered-backprojection reconstruction of the point source has a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.7 mm near the isocenter and degrades to 2.5 mm at a radial distance of 50 mm. The scanner's average energy resolution is 12.7% (ΔE/E FWHM) and the coincidence resolution time is 609 ps. The peak absolute sensitivity is 4.0% and the true and noise-equivalent count rates reach their peak at an activity of 46 MBq with 483 kcps and 407 kcps, respectively, with a scatter fraction of 13%. The iterative reconstruction of the image quality phantom has a uniformity of 3.7%, and recovery coefficients from 0.29, 0.91 and 0.94 for rod diameters of 1 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm, respectively. After application of scatter and attenuation corrections, the air- and water-filled cold regions have spill-over ratios of 6.3% and 5.4%, respectively. The Hyperion IID PET/MR insert provides state-of-the-art PET performance while enabling simultaneous PET/MRI acquisition of small animals up to rabbit size.

Maximum likelihood positioning algorithm for high-resolution PET scanners.

PURPOSE: In high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET), lightsharing elements are incorporated into typical detector stacks to read out scintillator arrays in which one scintillator element (crystal) is smaller than the size of the readout channel. In order to identify the hit crystal by means of the measured light distribution, a positioning algorithm is required. One commonly applied positioning algorithm uses the center of gravity (COG) of the measured light distribution. The COG algorithm is limited in spatial resolution by noise and intercrystal Compton scatter. The purpose of this work is to develop a positioning algorithm which overcomes this limitation. METHODS: The authors present a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm which compares a set of expected light distributions given by probability density functions (PDFs) with the measured light distribution. Instead of modeling the PDFs by using an analytical model, the PDFs of the proposed ML algorithm are generated assuming a single-gamma-interaction model from measured data. The algorithm was evaluated with a hot-rod phantom measurement acquired with the preclinical hyperion II (D) PET scanner. In order to assess the performance with respect to sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality, the ML algorithm was compared to a COG algorithm which calculates the COG from a restricted set of channels. The authors studied the energy resolution of the ML and the COG algorithm regarding incomplete light distributions (missing channel information caused by detector dead time). Furthermore, the authors investigated the effects of using a filter based on the likelihood values on sensitivity, energy resolution, and image quality. RESULTS: A sensitivity gain of up to 19% was demonstrated in comparison to the COG algorithm for the selected operation parameters. Energy resolution and image quality were on a similar level for both algorithms. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that the performance of the ML algorithm is less prone to missing channel information. A likelihood filter visually improved the image quality, i.e., the peak-to-valley increased up to a factor of 3 for 2-mm-diameter phantom rods by rejecting 87% of the coincidences. A relative improvement of the energy resolution of up to 12.8% was also measured rejecting 91% of the coincidences. CONCLUSIONS: The developed ML algorithm increases the sensitivity by correctly handling missing channel information without influencing energy resolution or image quality. Furthermore, the authors showed that energy resolution and image quality can be improved substantially by rejecting events that do not comply well with the single-gamma-interaction model, such as Compton-scattered events.

Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SiPM technology.

Hyperion-II(D) is a positron emission tomography (PET) insert which allows simultaneous operation in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. To read out the scintillation light of the employed lutetium yttrium orthosilicate crystal arrays with a pitch of 1 mm and 12 mm in height, digital silicon photomultipliers (DPC 3200-22, Philips Digital Photon Counting) (DPC) are used. The basic PET performance in terms of energy resolution, coincidence resolution time (CRT) and sensitivity as a function of the operating parameters, such as the operating temperature, the applied overvoltage, activity and configuration parameters of the DPCs, has been evaluated at system level. The measured energy resolution did not show a large dependency on the selected parameters and is in the range of 12.4%-12.9% for low activity, degrading to ∼13.6% at an activity of ∼100 MBq. The CRT strongly depends on the selected trigger scheme (trig) of the DPCs, and we measured approximately 260 ps, 440 ps, 550 ps and 1300 ps for trig 1-4, respectively. The trues sensitivity for a NEMA NU 4 mouse-sized scatter phantom with a 70 mm long tube of activity was dependent on the operating parameters and was determined to be 0.4%-1.4% at low activity. The random fraction stayed below 5% at activity up to 100 MBq and the scatter fraction was evaluated as ∼6% for an energy window of 411 keV-561 keV and ∼16% for 250 keV-625 keV. Furthermore, we performed imaging experiments using a mouse-sized hot-rod phantom and a large rabbit-sized phantom. In 2D slices of the reconstructed mouse-sized hot-rod phantom (∅ = 28 mm), the rods were distinguishable from each other down to a rod size of 0.8 mm. There was no benefit from the better CRT of trig 1 over trig 3, where in the larger rabbit-sized phantom (∅ = 114 mm) we were able to show a clear improvement in image quality using the time-of-flight information. The findings will allow system architects-aiming at a similar detector design using DPCs-to make predictions about the design requirements and the performance that can be expected.