Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stem Cells Transl Med ; 11(1): 55-58, 2022 03 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chains (NF-L) were shown to serve as a reliable biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). The chemokine receptor CXCL13 was shown to correlate with CNS inflammatory activity and to predict the future progression of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the levels of NF-L and CXCL13 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in patients with progressive MS. METHODS: The CSF samples were obtained from 48 patients with progressive MS who participated in a double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial that tested the effects of intrathecal (IT) or intravenous (IV) transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), at baseline (before the first injection of the MSC) and at 6 months following treatment with MSC, or sham treatment. The CSF specimens were tested in a blinded way, using a single-molecule array (SIMOA) technique. FINDINGS: The CSF levels of NF-L were significantly lower at 6 months following treatment with MSC-IT when compared with the baseline, pre-treatment measurements (P = .026, Wilcoxon paired test). Nine out of 15 tested patients in the MSC-IT group had a reduction in NF-L levels of more than 50% (median decrease: -4449 pg/mL) when compared with 5/15 in the MSC-IV group (median decrease: -151 pg/mL) and 1/15 in the placebo group (median increase: +2450 pg/mL) (P = .001 for MSC-IT vs. placebo, chi-square test). CXCL13 levels were also reduced at 6 months following MSC-IT treatment but not to a statistically significant level. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate possible neuroprotective effects of MSC transplantation in patients with MS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02166021.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive , Multiple Sclerosis , Biomarkers , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/cerebrospinal fluid , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/therapy
2.
Brain ; 143(12): 3574-3588, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253391

ABSTRACT

In this study (trial registration: NCT02166021), we aimed to evaluate the optimal way of administration, the safety and the clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in patients with active and progressive multiple sclerosis. Forty-eight patients (28 males and 20 females) with progressive multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale: 3.0-6.5, mean : 5.6 ± 0.8, mean age: 47.5 ± 12.3) and evidence of either clinical worsening or activity during the previous year, were enrolled (between 2015 and 2018). Patients were randomized into three groups and treated intrathecally (IT) or intravenously (IV) with autologous MSCs (1 × 106/kg) or sham injections. After 6 months, half of the patients from the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups were retreated with MSCs, and the other half with sham injections. Patients initially assigned to sham treatment were divided into two subgroups and treated with either MSC-IT or MSC-IV. The study duration was 14 months. No serious treatment-related safety issues were detected. Significantly fewer patients experienced treatment failure in the MSC-IT and MSC-IV groups compared with those in the sham-treated group (6.7%, 9.7%, and 41.9%, respectively, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0008). During the 1-year follow-up, 58.6% and 40.6% of patients treated with MSC-IT and MSC-IV, respectively, exhibited no evidence of disease activity compared with 9.7% in the sham-treated group (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0048, respectively). MSC-IT transplantation induced additional benefits on the relapse rate, on the monthly changes of the T2 lesion load on MRI, and on the timed 25-foot walking test, 9-hole peg test, optical coherence tomography, functional MRI and cognitive tests. Treatment with MSCs was well-tolerated in progressive multiple sclerosis and induced short-term beneficial effects regarding the primary end points, especially in the patients with active disease. The intrathecal administration was more efficacious than the intravenous in several parameters of the disease. A phase III trial is warranted to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Endpoint Determination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Injections, Spinal , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/therapy , Neuropsychological Tests , Recurrence , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Walking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...