Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 49(12): 722-9, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22122814

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the onset of analgesic effect for a new formulation of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate versus conventional ibuprofen (ibuprofen acid). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, patients requiring surgical removal of two impacted or partially impacted mandibular third molars received: ibuprofen sodium dihydrate 400 mg plus conventional ibuprofen placebo (Group 1); or conventional ibuprofen 400 mg plus ibuprofen sodium dihydrate placebo (Group 2) following the first surgery. Patients were then crossed over to the alternative treatment. RESULTS: 72 patients were enrolled in Group 1 and 72 patients in Group 2. Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate produced faster initial pain relief than conventional ibuprofen as assessed by time to first pain relief (24.6 vs. 30.5 minutes; p = 0.004), and patient-assessed pain relief at 15 minutes ("some" to "complete" pain relief: 43% vs. 29%; p < 0.001) and 30 minutes (82% vs. 63%; p < 0.001) and pain intensity at 30 minutes (p < 0.001). Substantial pain relief with ibuprofen sodium dihydrate was twice that of conventional ibuprofen at 30 minutes (11% vs. 5%; not significant); 29% and 33% of patients did not reach substantial pain relief at 120 minutes. There were no adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and only two serious adverse events (oral abscess and facial paresis with conventional ibuprofen) considered unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate was as effective as conventional ibuprofen, but had a faster onset of initial pain relief and significantly reduced pain intensity within the first 30 minutes after administration, providing rapid clinically meaningful pain relief for patients.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Male
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 39(5): 446-51, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20189354

ABSTRACT

The aim was to report the distribution, frequency and aetiology of jaw fractures in patients treated at the University Hospital, Malmö, 1993-2003 and to compare two previous studies from 1952-1962 and 1975-1985. In 1993-2003, 461 patients, 137 women (mean age 42 years; range 15-82) and 324 men (mean age 28 years; range 17-59) were diagnosed and treated. Women were significantly older than men (P<0.001). The most frequent cause of jaw fractures was falls in women (45%). In men, interpersonal violence (46%) was most common followed by road traffic accidents (RTAs) (24%) mostly involving bicycles (14%). The frequency of falls in women and men was significantly different (P<0.001) as was the difference between violence in men and women (P<0.001). The proportion of fractures caused by RTAs was significantly higher in 1952-1962 than in 1993-2003 (P<0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of fractures caused by violence between the two studies (P=0.007). In 1993-2003 the proportion of fractures in women due to falls was significantly higher than in 1952-1962 (P=0.006). Violence has replaced RTAs as the main cause for jaw fractures in men; for women falling is the commonest cause.


Subject(s)
Jaw Fractures/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Jaw Fractures/etiology , Jaw Fractures/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Statistics, Nonparametric , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 36(4): 310-4, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17239563

ABSTRACT

At the University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden, standardized trauma charts were used for registration of all jaw fractures from 1972 to 1976. During the year 2005 the aim was to interview all patients treated non-surgically for unilateral mandibular condylar fractures during this period. In total, 49 patients with unilateral condylar fractures were treated non-surgically in 1972-1976. Of these, 23 patients were available for follow-up, 17 were dead, 7 were not found and 2 did not answer letters or phone calls. The follow-up was a telephone interview according to a standardized questionnaire concerning occurrence of pain and headache, function of the jaw and joint sounds. Information from original records, radiographic reports and the standardized trauma charts revealed fracture site, type of fracture and intermaxillary fixation if any. Eighty-seven percent of the patients reported no pain from the jaws, 83% had no problems chewing and 91% reported no impact of the fracture on daily activities. Neck and shoulder symptoms were reported by 39% and back pain by 30%. The 31-year results of non-surgical treatment of unilateral non-dislocated and minor dislocated condylar fractures seem favourable concerning function, occurrence of pain and impact on daily life.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Condyle/injuries , Mandibular Fractures/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Back Pain/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Facial Pain/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Headache/etiology , Humans , Jaw Fixation Techniques , Male , Mandible/physiopathology , Mandibular Fractures/classification , Mastication/physiology , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/etiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...