Adenoviral Gene Transfer of Gremlin Modulates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A-Induced Angiogenesis in Porcine Myocardium.

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. New therapies are needed for patients who do not benefit or are not suitable for current treatments. Angiogenic gene therapy using vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) has shown potential in preclinical trials. However, undesired side effects, such as increased permeability, limit their therapeutic potential. The aim of this study was to investigate if adenoviral gene transfer of a VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) ligand Gremlin, given simultaneously with VEGF-A, could modulate VEGFR-2-mediated increase in permeability without impairing the angiogenic effect of VEGF-A gene therapy. Gene transfers were done in pigs (n = 22) using endocardial injections with an endovascular injection catheter. Animals were divided in three groups receiving adenoviral (Ad) VEGF-A (n = 10), Gremlin (n = 6), or VEGF-A+Gremlin (n = 6) gene therapy. Animals were sacrificed and samples collected 6 days later for histological, safety, and permeability analyses. The mean capillary area was significantly increased in both treatment groups with AdVEGF-A when compared with the AdGremlin group. Also, the capillary area was significantly larger in AdVEGF-A group without AdGremlin. No significant differences in tissue permeability were observed using modified Miles assay between AdVEGF-A and AdVEGF-A+AdGremlin groups. However, cardiac tamponade and sudden cardiac deaths were observed only in the AdVEGF-A group. AdVEGF-A induces strong angiogenesis in porcine myocardium. Our results suggest that AdGremlin can limit the side effects of AdVEGF-A therapy, even though no direct effect on tissue permeability could be demonstrated. This could enable the use of larger AdVEGF-A doses to increase the treatment area and angiogenic effects without adverse side effects.

AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-DΔNΔC induce angiogenesis and increase perfusion in porcine myocardium.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary heart disease remains a significant clinical problem, and new therapies are needed especially for patients with refractory angina for whom the current therapies do not provide sufficient relief. The aim of this study was to find out if angiogenic gene therapy using new members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, VEGF-B186 and VEGF-DΔNΔC, increase myocardial perfusion as measured by the positron emission tomography (PET) 15O-imaging, and whether there would be coronary steal effect to the contralateral side. Furthermore, safety of intramyocardial angiogenic adenoviral gene transfer was evaluated. METHODS: Intramyocardial adenoviral (Ad) VEGF-B186 or AdVEGF-DΔNΔC gene transfers were given endovascularly into the porcine posterolateral wall of the left ventricle (n=34). Six days later, PET 15O-imaging for myocardial perfusion and coronary angiography were performed. RESULTS: AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-DΔNΔC induced angiogenesis and increased total microvascular area 1.8-fold (95% CI 0.2 to 3.5) and 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4 to 4.3), respectively. At rest, perfusion was maintained at normal levels, but at stress, relative perfusion was increased 1.4-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) for AdVEGF-B186 and 1.3-fold (95% CI 1.0 to 1.7) for AdVEGF-DΔNΔC, without causing coronary steal effect in the control area. The therapy was well tolerated and did not lead to any significant changes in laboratory safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Both AdVEGF-B186 and AdVEGF-DΔNΔC gene transfers induced efficient angiogenesis in the myocardium resulting in an increased myocardial perfusion measured by PET. Importantly, local perfusion increase did not induce any coronary steal effect. As such, both treatments seem suitable new candidates for the induction of therapeutic angiogenesis for the treatment of refractory angina.

VEGF-C and VEGF-C156S in the pro-lymphangiogenic growth factor therapy of lymphedema: a large animal study.

INTRODUCTION: VEGF-C156S, a lymphangiogenesis-specific form of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C), has been considered as a promising candidate for the experimental pro-lymphangiogenic treatment, as it lacks potential angiogenic effects. As a precursor to future clinical trials, the therapeutic efficacy and blood vascular side effects of VEGF-C and VEGF-C156S were compared in a large animal model of secondary lymphedema. Combination of lymphatic growth factor treatment and autologous lymph node transfer was used to normalize the lymphatic anatomy after surgical excision of lymphatic tissue. METHODS: Lymph vessels around the inguinal lymph node of female domestic pigs were destroyed in order to impair the normal lymphatic drainage from the hind limb. Local injections of adenoviruses (Ad) encoding VEGF-C or VEGF-C156S were used to enhance the regrowth of the lymphatic vasculature. AdLacZ (ß-galactosidase) and saline injections served as controls. RESULTS: Both VEGF-C and VEGF-C156S induced growth of new lymphatic vessels in the area of excision, although lymphangiogenesis was notably stronger after VEGF-C treatment. Also the transferred lymph nodes were best-preserved in the VEGF-C-treated pigs. Despite the enlargement of blood vessels following the VEGF-C therapy, no signs of sprouting angiogenesis or increased blood vascular permeability in the form of increased wound exudate volumes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that VEGF-C provides the preferred alternative for growth factor therapy of lymphedema when compared to VEGF-C156S, due to the superior lymphangiogenic response and minor blood vessel effects. Furthermore, these observations suggest that activation of both VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 might be needed for efficient lymphangiogenesis.

Current gene therapy trials for vascular diseases.

INTRODUCTION: In the previous gene therapy trials for vascular diseases, safety of the therapies has been demonstrated with some evidence for clinical benefits. In the future, it will be important to also test the potential clinical benefits of the treatments in randomized and controlled trials with sufficient numbers of patients. AREAS COVERED: This review covers 15 currently ongoing cardiovascular gene therapy trials that aim to treat coronary artery disease, heart failure and peripheral artery disease. This review summarizes current trials and their main features in the cardiovascular field. EXPERT OPINION: In the gene therapy trials for vascular diseases, some limiting factors are still present. The trials have enrolled mainly elderly and severely affected patients who might not have the capacity to respond optimally to the therapies. Also, major cardiac adverse events, major amputations, mortality and other very demanding hard clinical end points have been used in relatively small patient populations. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enroll less severely affected patients and to use more informative surrogate end points in the forthcoming clinical trials.

The bottleneck stent model for chronic myocardial ischemia and heart failure in pigs.

A large animal model of chronic myocardial ischemia and heart failure is crucial for the development of novel therapeutic approaches. In this study we developed a novel percutaneous one- and two-vessel model for chronic myocardial ischemia using a stent coated with a polytetrafluoroethylene tube formed in a bottleneck shape. The bottleneck stent was implanted in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) or proximal circumflex artery (LCX), or in both proximal LCX and mid LAD 1 wk later (2-vessel model), and pigs were followed for 4-5 wk. Ejection fraction (EF), infarct size, collateral growth, and myocardial perfusion were assessed. Pigs were given antiarrhythmic medication to prevent sudden death. The occlusion time of the bottleneck stent and the timing of myocardial infarction could be modulated by the duration of antiplatelet medication. Fractional flow reserve measurements and positron emission tomography imaging showed severe ischemia after bottleneck stenting covering over 50% of the left ventricle in the proximal LAD model. Complete coronary occlusion was necessary for significant collateral growth, which mostly had occurred already during the first wk after the stent occlusion. Dynamic and competitive collateral growth patterns were observed. EF declined from 64 to 41% in the LCX model and to 44% in the LAD model 4 wk after stenting with 12 and 21% infarcted left ventricle in the LCX and LAD models, respectively. The mortality was 32 and 37% in the LCX and LAD models but very (71%) high in the two-vessel disease model. The implantation of a novel bottleneck stent in the proximal LAD or LCX is a novel porcine model of reversible myocardial ischemia (open stent) and ischemic heart failure (occluded stent) and is feasible for the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Lymph node transfer and perinodal lymphatic growth factor treatment for lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to define the optimal growth factor treatment to be used in combination with lymph node transfer to normalize lymphatic vascular anatomy. BACKGROUND: In the lymph node transfer method, lymphatic anastomoses are expected to form spontaneously. However, lymphangiogenic growth factor therapies have shown promising results in preclinical models of lymphedema. METHODS: The inguinal lymphatic vasculature of pigs was surgically destroyed around the inguinal lymph node. To enhance the regrowth of the lymphatic network in the defected area, adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) was administered intranodally or perinodally. Control animals received injections of saline or control vector. The lymphangiogenic effect of the growth factor therapy and any potential adverse effects associated with the 2 alternative delivery routes were examined 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Both routes of growth factor administration induced robust growth of lymphatic vessels and helped to preserve the structure of the transferred lymph nodes in comparison with the controls. The lymph nodes of the control treated animals regressed in size and their nodal structure was partly replaced by fibro-fatty scar tissue. Intranodally injected adenoviral VEGF-C and adenoviral vector encoding control gene LacZ induced macrophage accumulation inside the node, whereas perinodal administration of VEGF-C did not have this adverse effect. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphangiogenic growth factors improve lymphatic vessel regeneration and lymph node function after lymph node transfer. The perinodal route of delivery provides a basis for future clinical trials in lymphedema patients.