Public health approach to detection of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: summary of two outbreaks and laboratory procedures.

Routine laboratory testing may not detect non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) reliably. Active clinical, epidemiological, environmental health, and laboratory collaboration probably influence successful detection and study of non-O157 STEC infection. We summarized two outbreak investigations in which such coordinated efforts identified non-O157 STEC disease and led to effective control measures. Outbreak 1 involved illness associated with consuming unpasteurized apple cider from a local orchard. Public health personnel were notified by a local hospital; stool specimens from ill persons contained O111 STEC. Outbreak 2 involved bloody diarrhoea at a correctional facility. Public health personnel were notified by the facility infection control officer; O45 STEC was the implicated agent. These reports highlight the ability of non-O157 STEC to cause outbreaks and demonstrate that a coordinated effort by clinicians, infection-control practitioners, clinical diagnostic laboratorians, and public health personnel can lead to effective identification, investigation, and prevention of non-O157 STEC disease.

Development of a genomics-based PCR assay for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in a large outbreak in New York State.

A genomics-based PCR method was developed and used to test specimens from patients involved in a large outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in a closed religious community in New York State. New P1 adhesin gene primers were designed to bind to 9 of 10 target sequences in the repetitive-element sequences obtained from the whole genome sequence of M. pneumoniae. This PCR method had a sensitivity of 0.006 CFU and a specificity of 100% for M. pneumoniae. The PCR was validated by testing a subset of patient samples by culture and comparing the results to those obtained by PCR. Of the initial 280 samples tested, 73 were positive by PCR and 22 were positive by culture. All samples positive by culture were also positive by PCR. Follow-up testing of selected patients 3 to 6 weeks after antibiotic treatment revealed that eight samples remained positive by PCR and that three samples remained positive by culture. Additionally, no nonspecific PCR inhibition was detected as a result of the specimen type, transport medium, or sample preparation methodology. The study demonstrates that the PCR described here is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the identification of M. pneumoniae and was helpful for the detection and monitoring of the outbreak.