Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 21(12): 436-442, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36508599

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The worldwide rise in popularity of climbing and development of climbing as a competitive sport is reflected by its debut at the 2021 Summer Olympic Games in Tokyo. Digital primary periphyseal stress injuries in adolescent climbers may pose a significant risk to long-term skeletal health. The aim of this article is to critically review research on the diagnosis and management of primary periphyseal stress injuries of the fingers in adolescent climbers. We adopted a systematic approach to searching for relevant literature. Articles were identified after searches of the following electronic databases: Discover, Academic Search Complete, PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect. Conclusive evidence suggests digital primary periphyseal stress injuries are a consequence of repetitive microtrauma. Pain reported by adolescent climbers on the dorsal aspect of the proximal interphalangeal joint should be investigated promptly to avoid serious negative consequences. Clinicians should be aware of the efficacy of imaging techniques to inform a clinical diagnosis. A conservative management approach is preferred but in rare cases surgical intervention may be necessary. A diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for digital primary periphyseal stress injuries is presented.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Finger Injuries , Mountaineering , Sports , Humans , Adolescent , Mountaineering/injuries , Finger Injuries/diagnosis , Finger Injuries/therapy , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy
4.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol ; 24(2): 189-194, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035876

ABSTRACT

Background: Hand and upper limb soft tissue infections result in significant disability and loss of productivity. Many infections have been shown to follow a seasonal variation, however little is known about this is the context of upper limb soft tissue infections. We aimed to evaluate seasonal variation in acute bacterial, hand and upper limb skin and soft-tissue infections, and correlate findings with key environmental variables. Methods: Hand and upper limb soft tissue infection cases from 2006-2016 were retrieved from a single UK center. Cases were reviewed for microbiology culture and sensitivity. Correlation between cases and season, temperature and humidity was assessed. Results: 206 cases were identified for inclusion. Specimens were sent for microbiology in 76.4% of cases. Of these 78.9% were culture positive, 47.6% exhibited antibiotic resistance and 16.9% were multi-resistant. There was a significant difference between season and culture positive cases, with significantly more culture positive cases in the summer vs. winter on post-hoc analysis (p = 0.004). There was a significant positive correlation between higher temperatures and number of culture positive cases (r = 0.75). There was no significant correlation between temperature and antibiotic resistance (r = 0.5) or between humidity and culture positive cases (r = -0.42). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a seasonal variation in hand and upper limb infections, with a significant correlation between infection rates and ambient temperature. Appreciating seasonal variability of these infections could prove beneficial for surgical planning, public health recommendations and antibiotic guidelines. However, further international data is needed to understand potential mechanisms involved.


Subject(s)
Hand/microbiology , Seasons , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Upper Extremity/microbiology , Humans , Humidity , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Temperature , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
J Hand Surg Am ; 43(5): 432-438, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398329

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Smoking conventional cigarettes reduces peripheral microcirculation leading to worse outcomes after hand surgery. Patients are increasingly using electronic cigarettes (eCigarettes); however, there is no published research investigating the effects of eCigarettes on hand microcirculation. METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects with a median age of 26 years were recruited: 7 smokers and 8 nonsmokers. A noninvasive O2C laser Doppler probe measured a baseline control reading at deep (7-mm) and superficial (3-mm) levels. Participants commenced a 5-minute smoking protocol of nonnicotine (0-mg) eCigarettes with continuous microcirculation measurements during smoking and for 20 minutes afterward. This was repeated with nicotine (24-mg) eCigarettes. Readings were averaged over 5-minute periods and standardized as a percentage of baseline. A linear mixed-effects model with an unstructured covariance structure was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Smokers had a statistically significant reduction in hand microcirculation during and up to 20 minutes after smoking a 24-mg eCigarette. There was a maximum reduction of 77% in superficial flow and 29% in deep flow. After smoking a 0-mg eCigarette, smokers demonstrated an increase in superficial flow of up to 70% with no change in deep flow. Nonsmokers had no statistically significant change in superficial or deep flow after smoking either eCigarette. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-mg eCigarette significantly reduced smokers' hand microcirculation during and after smoking. Microcirculation increased in smokers after inhalation of a 0-mg eCigarette. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We advise smokers undergoing hand surgery to avoid high-dose eCigarettes and, if necessary, to use 0-mg eCigarettes as an alternative.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Hand/blood supply , Microcirculation , Adult , Blood Flow Velocity , Case-Control Studies , Ganglionic Stimulants/administration & dosage , Ganglionic Stimulants/adverse effects , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Nicotine/adverse effects , Young Adult
6.
J Sports Sci ; 34(22): 2153, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578538

ABSTRACT

We read with interest the authors' paper on this important area of climbing physiology. We however wish to highlight the incorrect identification of flexor carpi radialis (FCR) as a finger flexor and the implications it has for the conclusions described. FCR is a wrist flexor and has no direct bearing on flexion of the fingers during a climbing grip and thus could be expected to have a reduced oxygenation response compared to flexor digitorum profundus. We also would like to seek clarification from the authors regarding their confidence in their method for locating the two muscles under investigation as we feel this may not be accurately possible using the method described.


Subject(s)
Forearm/blood supply , Mountaineering/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/blood supply , Oxygen Consumption , Fingers/physiology , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Regional Blood Flow
7.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 25(3): 455-62, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26475635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the pathomorphology of proximal humeral fractures to determine relevant and reliable parameters for fracture classification. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive acute proximal humeral fractures in adult patients were analyzed by 2 non-independent observers from a single shoulder department using a standardized protocol based on biplane radiographs and 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. A fracture classification system based on the most reliable key features of the pathomorphologic analysis was created, and its reliability was tested by 6 independent shoulder experts analyzing another 100 consecutive proximal humeral fractures. RESULTS: The head position in relation to the shaft (varus, valgus, sagittal deformity) and the presence of tuberosity fractures showed a higher interobserver reliability (κ > 0.8) than measurements for medial hinge, shaft, and tuberosity displacement, metaphyseal extension, fracture impaction, as well as head-split component identification (κ < 0.7). These findings were used to classify nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures as type 1, fractures with normal coronal head position but sagittal deformity as type 2, valgus fractures as type 3, varus fractures as type 4, and fracture dislocations as type 5. The fracture type was further combined with the fractured main fragments (G for greater tuberosity, L for lesser). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability analysis for the fracture classification revealed a κ value (95% confidence interval) of 0.700 (0.631-0.767) and 0.917 (0.879-0.943), respectively. CONCLUSION: The new classification system with emphasis on the qualitative aspects of proximal humeral fractures showed high reliability when based on a standardized imaging protocol including computed tomography scans.


Subject(s)
Shoulder Fractures/classification , Shoulder Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...