Closed blunt-trocar 5 mm-port for primary cannulation in laparoscopic surgery: A safe technique.

Primary cannulation of the peritoneal cavity is a critical part of laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and applicability of a direct blunt-port primary cannulation. The peritoneal cavity was accessed by direct trocar-port insertion at sites other than the umbilicus and avoiding abdominal scars. A 5-mm port with a smooth blunt tip conical trocar was employed using a closed technique. The closed blunt trocar-port technique for primary cannulation of the peritoneal cavity was applied in 503 of 524 patients (96%) who underwent laparoscopic surgery between 2002 and 2005. Some 199 patients (38%) had abdominal scars of previous surgery. There were no major complications, but minor complications occurred in 3 patients (0.6%). No bowel or retroperitoneal vascular injuries were encountered. The closed introduction of a blunt-tipped 5-mm port, conical-trocar is a simple technique for primary cannulation in laparoscopic surgery that allows safe and rapid access to the peritoneal.

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of the laparoscopic approach to splenectomy, its application in patients with massive splenomegaly (splenic weight >or= 1000 g) remains controversial. In this study we evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly compared with open splenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One surgeon applied the laparoscopic approach to splenectomy to all comers with massive splenomegaly, while other surgeons carried out the surgery through a laparotomy. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Results of continuous variables are shown as medians. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy between 2000 and 2005, and 13 underwent open splenectomy between 1996 and 2003. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and splenic weight (1.3 vs. 1.1 kg). There was one conversion (6.6%) to open surgery. Although laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with significantly longer operating time (175 vs. 90 minutes, P < 0.001), it carried lower postoperative morbidity and mortality (13.3 vs. 30.8% and 0 vs. 7.7%, respectively). Laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with significantly lower total dose (29 vs. 264 mg morphine-equivalent, P < 0.0001) and duration of opiate usage (1 vs. 4 days, P < 0.0001); duration of parenteral hydration (24 vs. 96 hours, P = 0.006) and more rapid resumption of oral diet (24 vs. 72 hours, P = 0.017); and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 vs. 10 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to splenectomy for massive splenomegaly is feasible and safe. Despite a longer operating time, the postoperative recovery following laparoscopic splenectomy is smoother, with lower morbidity and shorter postoperative hospital stay compared with open splenectomy.

Laparoscopic gastric and biliary bypass: a single-center cohort prospective study.

PURPOSE: Relief of gastric outlet and distal biliary obstruction may be accomplished by open surgery or by minimally invasive techniques including endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. We examined the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic gastric and biliary bypass in all patients with malignant and benign disease requiring surgical relief of obstructive symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with benign duodenal stricture or inoperable malignancy underwent therapeutic laparoscopic bypass surgery. Prophylactic gastric or biliary bypass was added in selected patients with nonmetastatic malignancy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (17 of them female) with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-81 years) underwent 29 laparoscopic bypass procedures for malignant (n = 23) or benign (n = 6) disease. One patient who underwent a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced ulcer disease developed stenosis of the stoma that required laparoscopic refashioning 2 months later, accounting for the 29th procedure reported herein in 28 patients. Surgery included the construction of a single gastric (n = 16) or biliary (n = 5) bypass or a double bypass (n = 8), and an additional prophylactic bypass in 5 of 23 cancer patients (21.8%). All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The median operative time was 90 minutes (range, 60-153 minutes) and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-6 days). Complications developed following 4 procedures (13.8%) and 1 patient died (3.4%). No complications occurred in patients with prophylactic bypass. One patient required laparoscopic revision of the gastroenterostomy 2 months postoperatively, for benign disease. No recurrence of obstructive symptoms was observed in cancer patients during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic bypass surgery for distal biliary and gastric obstruction in patients with benign or malignant disease results in low morbidity and mortality and short postoperative hospital stay. The addition of prophylactic bypass in patients with nonmetastatic unresectable malignancy appears safe and effective.

An "all 5-mm ports" selective approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and anti-reflux surgery.

Laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, or anti-reflux procedures are conventionally performed with the use of one and often two 10/12-mm ports. While needlescopic or micropuncture laparoscopic procedures reduce postoperative pain, they invariably involve the use of one 10/12-mm port and the instruments applied have their ergo-dynamic shortcomings. Between September 2002 and March 2003, we have attempted an "all 5-mm ports" approach in 49 laparoscopic procedures, which included 18 of 59 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (31%), 26 diagnostic laparoscopies for suspected appendicitis (of which we proceeded to a laparoscopic appendectomy in 17 patients), and in the last 5 of 9 laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. Conversion of one of the 5-mm ports to a 10-mm port was required in 5 of the 18 (28%) laparoscopic cholecystectomies and in 6 of the 17 (35%) laparoscopic appendectomies to facilitate organ retrieval in patients with large gallstones (>5 mm in diameter) and in obese patients with fatty mesoappendix. There were no conversions to open surgery. No significant differences in the operating time between the laparoscopic procedures performed by the all 5-mm ports approach or the conventional approach were observed. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in this series. The "all 5-mm ports" approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in selected patients and to laparoscopic fundoplication appears feasible and safe. A randomised comparison between this approach and the conventional laparoscopic approach to elective cholecystectomy and fundoplication in which two of the ports employed are of the 10-mm diameter is warranted.