Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary for positive preoperative aspiration cytology lymph node results?

INTRODUCTION: Based on international guidelines, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended in cases of breast cancer if preoperative examinations confirm axillary metastasis. We examined which set of preoperative parameters might render ALND unnecessary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative examinations (axillary ultrasound and aspiration cytology) confirmed axillary metastasis in 190 cases out of 2671 patients with breast cancer; primary ALN dissection was performed on these patients with or without prior neoadjuvant therapy. The clinicopathological results were analysed to determine which parameter might predict the presence of no more than 2 or 3 metastatic ALNs. RESULTS: The final histological examination confirmed 1-3 metastatic lymph nodes in ALND samples in 116 cases and over 3 metastatic lymph nodes in 74 cases. For patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (59 out of the 190 cases), if the size of the primary tumour was 2 cm or smaller and/or the metastatic ALN was 15 mm or smaller, then the patient was likely to have no more than 3 positive ALNs (stage N0-1 disease) (p < 0.001). If the patient did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, stage N2 or N3 disease was very likely. No correlation was found between other clinicopathological characteristics of the tumour and involvement of the ALNs. CONCLUSION: Axillary lymph node dissection is not necessary for selected breast cancer patients with axillary metastasis receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without radiation therapy and close follow-up may serve as adequate therapy.

Is intraoperative touch imprint cytology indicated in the surgical treatment of early breast cancers?

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative touch imprint cytology (TIC) of the sentinel lymph node(s) (SLN(s)) in the treatment of breast cancer has significantly reduced the number of axillary block dissections (ABD) required during second surgeries. Based on recent studies, ABD was not considered necessary if the presence of tumor cells/micrometastasis was confirmed in the SLN(s) or in the case of macrometastases in a patient group meeting the inclusion criteria for the ACOSOG Z0011 study. Our aim was to determine the sensitivity and usefulness of TIC with regard to these results. METHODS: TICs of the SLN(s) were examined in 1168 patients operated on for breast cancer. The method was also analyzed retrospectively based on the guidelines for the Z0011 study. During TIC, new samples were cut every 250 µm; impression smears were evaluated after being stained with hematoxylin eosin. RESULTS: TIC confirmed metastasis in 202 cases (202/1168, 17.29%). Metastasis was confirmed in SLN(s) in 149 additional cases during a final histological examination. The sensitivity of TIC was found to be 57.18%, and its specificity was 99.63%. An analysis was then performed except for cases that met the inclusion criteria for the Z0011 study and with metastasis smaller than 2 mm (micrometastasis/isolated tumor cells) considered to be positive during intraoperative cytology. The sensitivity of the method decreased to 34.23%, while its specificity was still high at 99.76%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the new guidelines for ABD, imprint cytology cannot be considered a beneficial and cost-effective intervention in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer.

Unifocal, multifocal and diffuse carcinomas: a reproducibility study of breast cancer distribution.

Multifocality of invasive breast carcinoma has been associated with prognostic disadvantage. Unifocal, multifocal and diffuse distributions have been recently defined for both inasive carcinomas and in situ components, and these have been combined into categories of prognostic relevance. Eight observers analyzed the same series of 30 megaslides from 29 carcinomas, and had to classify the lesions into the three distribution patterns of unifocal, multifocal or diffuse (or not present/non influential). The reproducibility of the distribution patterns of invasive carcinomas was better than that of the in situ carcinoma components, but was still only fair to moderate on the basis of kappa values. The reproducibility of DCIS was poor to slight with some kappa values reflecting agreement by chance only. The results suggest the definitions of these distribution patterns require refinements for a more reliable and reproducible diagnosis if one wants to associate prognostic information with this variable.