Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(2): 7133, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32226063

ABSTRACT

Objective. To evaluate the impact of a single, half-day interprofessional education (IPE) simulation on disclosing medical errors, and to compare the impacts on pharmacy students with those on students from other health professional programs. Methods. A mixed methods approach was used to provide a comprehensive understanding of the immediate and persistent outcomes of a realistic medical error disclosure simulation. Anonymous pre- and post-simulation quantitative data were collected using a validated attitudinal survey instrument administered at the time of the simulation. To assess more sustained impacts of the simulation, uni-professional focus groups were held several months following the simulation. Results. The survey analysis showed that a significant positive change in attitudes towards teamwork, roles and responsibilities occurred in students in most of the professions represented, with pharmacy students experiencing positive changes across a wider range of interprofessional attitudes. The focus group results showed that there were persistent impacts across all professions on learners' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and confidence in disclosing medical errors in interprofessional teams. Conclusion. Mixed methods analysis of a high-fidelity IPE error disclosure simulation demonstrated that single IPE activities, if realistic, can have significant positive impacts on students' interprofessional attitudes and competencies, and increase confidence in conducting team-based error disclosures.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/methods , Interprofessional Education/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Pharmacy/organization & administration , Focus Groups , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Medical Errors , Professional Competence , Simulation Training , Students, Pharmacy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Truth Disclosure
2.
Med Ref Serv Q ; 37(3): 306-311, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30239301

ABSTRACT

In hospitals and clinics, anyone who "touches" a patient has a license authorizing them to do so-from the phlebotomist to the cardiologist, from the genetic counselor to the social worker, and so on, except for the clinical medical librarian. This column discusses the intent versus the realities of occupational licensure for clinical medical librarians and provides recommendations for next steps.


Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Librarians , Libraries, Medical/standards , Licensure/standards , Professional Competence/standards , Professional Role , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
3.
J Hosp Librariansh ; 15(2): 127-139, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26997921

ABSTRACT

A 2012 project provided forty-eight health sciences librarians from primarily hospital and academic health sciences libraries with an Apple iPad2 along with training and support on its use. Project objectives were to determine how participants would adopt the iPad into their daily operations and what form of leadership role they would play while participating in the project. By project's end eighty-nine percent indicated they would continue using the iPad primarily as a productivity tool and to provide point of need services. Project data indicated that librarians assumed a leadership role promoting the use of mobile technology and the applications available.

5.
J Med Libr Assoc ; 93(4 Suppl): S35-42, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16239956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A panel was convened to elicit guidance for librarians in initiating and implementing community-based health information outreach. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included a panel of individuals from communities or community organizations who represented the types of groups with which librarians or information specialists need to interact and an audience who represented health sciences libraries, public libraries, academic institutions, government agencies, funding agencies, and community-based organizations and could contribute to a discussion on community-based health information outreach. PROGRAM: The panel was presented with a hypothetical community setting and asked to respond to a series of questions: What do librarians need to learn about the community before they make their visits? What methods of outreach have been successful in your work? How would you implement and sustain a health information program in your community? How would health information interventions reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health? MAIN RESULTS: The panel helped to frame many of the issues that may confront librarians as they initiate information-related programs in communities. CONCLUSION: There is clear consensus on the need for librarians to make the effort to reach out into the community, to make the contacts, to seek to understand the community, to talk with leaders, and to respect the community as they promote and teach the use of health information resources. It was confirmed that librarians and libraries have an important role in diminishing health disparities by improving access to health information.


Subject(s)
Community-Institutional Relations , Health Education/organization & administration , Library Services/organization & administration , Professional Role , Community-Institutional Relations/standards , Consensus , Diffusion of Innovation , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Librarians , Library Materials , Library Services/statistics & numerical data , Organizational Objectives , Planning Techniques , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...