Ethical dilemmas in pain management.

The purpose of this study was to survey the membership of the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine to determine their beliefs about ethical dilemmas in pain management practice. Respondents rated ethical dilemmas for their importance as well as their own competence in dealing with these ethical issues. The survey also included an open-ended question that asked respondents to describe clinical situations in which they had encountered ethical dilemmas. A total of 1,105 surveys were analyzed, with physicians (N = 612), nurses (N = 189), and psychologists (N = 166) representing the professions with the greatest response. Management of pain at the end of life, general undertreatment of pain, and undertreatment of pain in the elderly were the most frequently encountered dilemmas. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify ethical issues in the case examples provided by the respondents. Major themes included inappropriate pain management, barriers to care, interactions and conflicts with others, regulatory/legal issues, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and research issues. We conclude that ethical dilemmas are common in pain management practice and that resolution of these dilemmas requires commitment by individual professionals as well as health systems.

The plasma endorphin, prostaglandin and catecholamine profile of patients with fibrositis treated with cyclobenzaprine and placebo: a 5-month study.

During a 5 month, double blind crossover study of the clinical effect of cyclobenzaprine on 7 patients with fibrositis, weekly measurements were done of plasma beta-endorphin (endorphin, prostaglandin E (PGE) and catecholamines). Endorphin levels were normal but varied with tender point tenderness. Mean plasma dopamine and PGE were elevated. Norepinephrine was normal to very high while epinephrine levels were continuously low to normal. We conclude that patients with fibrositis have a neurotransmitter plasma profile like other chronic pain states having stress and increased vasomotor activity with the possible exception of having low circulating epinephrine. This disparity may mark a failure of central nervous system pain modulation in fibrositis.

A multicenter trial of sulindac in osteoarthritis of the hip.

Sulindac (cis-5-fluoro-2-methyl-l-[(p-methyl sulfinyl)-benzylidene]-indene-3-acetic acid) is a new nonsteroidal antirheumatic drug recently evaluated in a double-blind trial of 91 patients with hip osteoarthritis. Consecutive patients with documented flare following previous drug withdrawal were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatment groups: (1) sulindac given twice daily, (2) sulindac given 4 times daily, and (3) placebo. The dosage of sulindac, 100 to 300 mg daily, was adjusted according to patient global response and tolerance at 3- to 7-day intervals over 3 wk. Of 15 efficacy measurements evalulated, there was no difference between sulindac given 2 or 4 times daily, but differences were disclosed between one or both sulindac treatment groups and placebo in 11 of the 15 efficacy measurements (p less than 0.05, less than 0.01). The frequency of adverse reactions was of the same order for each treatment group. These included gastrointestinal upset, rash, and dizziness, usually transient and mild to moderate in severity. Serial laboratory studies revealed no evidence of renal, hepatic, or hematopoietic toxicity.