Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Dent ; 11(4): 514-520, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29279680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the perception of trained dental professionals and laypersons toward the esthetic impact of variations in the vertical position, width, and gingival height of the maxillary lateral incisor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study analyzed the perspective of smile photographs by dental professionals such as "fifty orthodontics and fifty general dental practitioners (GDPs)" as well as fifty laypersons, consisting of an equal number of male and female participants. Photographs edited to depict alteration of golden proportion, incisal length, and gingival height of lateral incisor. SPSS software was used to analyze the data and determine the significant difference within all the participants, at 0.05% level (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ranking between the genders. Golden proportion of 62%-67% were ranked the highest by orthodontists, whereas GDPs and laypersons preferred 67%. Regarding gingival display, corrected height of -0.5 and -1 mm received highest ranking from all the three groups. In case of lateral incisal length, -0.5 mm was ranked highest by laypersons, in contrast to -1 mm by orthodontists and GDPs. CONCLUSION: Specific differences were observed in the ranking of smile esthetics by health-care professionals and laypersons. Golden proportion of 62% and 67% were ranked the highest by orthodontists, whereas GDPs and laypersons preferred 67%. Corrected gingival height of -0.5 and -1 mm received highest ranking from all the three groups. In case of lateral incisal length, -0.5 mm was ranked highest by laypersons, in contrast to -1 mm by orthodontists and GDPs.

2.
Angle Orthod ; 82(1): 75-83, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22220842

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes of orthodontists, periodontists, and general dentists regarding the use of soft tissue lasers by orthodontists during the course of orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analogous survey was developed to evaluate and compare the current opinions of a representative sample (n  =  538) of orthodontists (61.3%), periodontists (24.3%), and general dentists (14.3%) regarding orthodontists' use of soft tissue lasers. RESULTS: The majority (84%) of orthodontists, periodontists, and general dentists regarded the use of a soft tissue laser by orthodontists as appropriate. When compared to orthodontists and general dentists, a lower percentage of periodontists indicated that soft tissue laser use by orthodontists was appropriate (P < .01). For each of the eight specific soft tissue laser procedures investigated, periodontists reported a significantly lower level of appropriateness than did orthodontists and general dentists (P < .01). Around 75% of the total sample believed that referral would not be affected by the use of soft tissue lasers by orthodontists. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontists, periodontists, and general dentists differed in their opinions of the perceived appropriateness of soft tissue laser use by orthodontists, with periodontists reporting a lower level of appropriateness. Clinicians need to communicate effectively to ensure that orthodontic patients in need of adjunctive soft tissue surgery are treated to the accepted standard of care.


Subject(s)
Gingiva/surgery , Gingivectomy/instrumentation , Laser Therapy/instrumentation , Oral Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontics/instrumentation , Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Female , General Practice, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lasers, Semiconductor , Male , Periodontics/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation
3.
Angle Orthod ; 82(2): 202-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21861762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite (AOB) malocclusions between 10- to 11-year-old Birmingham schoolchildren and orthodontists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one orthodontists practicing in Birmingham (UK) and 383 school children aged 10-11 years from a random and representative sample of seven primary schools in South Birmingham participated in the study. Participants were asked to assess five anterior photographs of the dentition representing varying degrees of aesthetic impairment of Class III and AOB malocclusions. Perceptions of dental aesthetics were determined using the aesthetic component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). RESULTS: Perceptions of dental aesthetics were similar among males and females (P > .05). Both groups allocated the highest median AC score to the photo representing severe Class III malocclusion and the lowest to the photo representing mild Class III and AOB malocclusion. Differences in perceived dental aesthetics were significant for photos representing severe Class III and moderate AOB malocclusions, with orthodontists perceiving greater aesthetic impairment for severe Class III and schoolchildren for moderate AOB, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Schoolchildren and orthodontists perceived Class III malocclusions to have greater aesthetic impairment compared to AOB malocclusions. Surprisingly, none of the median AC scores allocated to the five photos were in the "Definite need" for treatment category. The IOTN may not be sensitive to these types of malocclusions. This finding merits further investigation.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Esthetics, Dental , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/psychology , Open Bite/psychology , Orthodontics , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need , Male
4.
Angle Orthod ; 80(1): 80-5, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19852644

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine soft tissue cephalometric norms of a sample of Jordanian adolescents and to compare them with those of North Americans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one subjects aged 14 to 17 years were selected from a larger random and representative sample of 320 adolescents attending 12 schools in the capital of Jordan, Amman. Seven reference lines were identified and traced according to definitions by Holdaway and Ricketts, and 2 angular and 12 linear measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between males and females in measurements of soft tissue facial angle, H angle, subnasale to H line, basic upper lip thickness, upper lip thickness and labrale inferius and superius to E line (P < .05). Males had a more prominent upper lip in relation to the overall soft tissue profile, while the lips of females were considerably more retrusive in relation to the nose and chin. Jordanian norms were similar to those of North Americans, with only two exceptions: the H angle and skeletal convexity which were 5.4 degrees and 3.2 mm greater in Jordanians, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Jordanian soft tissue norms were similar to American norms with the exception of the former having a more prominent upper lip position in relation to the overall soft tissue profile.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Face/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Arabs/ethnology , Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Chin/anatomy & histology , Ear Canal/anatomy & histology , Female , Humans , Jordan , Lip/anatomy & histology , Male , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Nasal Bone/anatomy & histology , North America , Nose/anatomy & histology , Orbit/anatomy & histology , Sella Turcica/anatomy & histology , Sex Factors , Vertical Dimension
5.
Angle Orthod ; 78(4): 670-5, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18302466

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the applicability of the Tanaka and Johnston method of prediction in a Jordanian population and to develop a new prediction method for this specific population if necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-hundred and sixty-seven Jordanians (193 female, 174 male, mean age 15.5 years) were randomly selected to represent 0.1% of 10th grade schoolchildren from Amman, Jordan. The mesiodistal crown diameters of the permanent teeth were measured and compared with the predicted values derived from the Tanaka and Johnston equations. RESULTS: Significant sexual dimorphism was found in tooth sizes. The correlation coefficients between the total mesiodistal width of the mandibular permanent incisors and that of the maxillary and mandibular canines and premolars were found to be 0.60 and 0.66, respectively. There were significant differences between the actual measurements and measurements derived from the Tanaka and Johnston equations. New linear regression equations were derived for both genders to allow tooth size prediction in Jordanians. CONCLUSIONS: There is a limitation in the application of the Tanaka and Johnston's prediction method to a Jordanian population. It is important to use separate equations for male and female patients.


Subject(s)
Dentition, Mixed , Tooth Crown/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Algorithms , Arabs , Female , Humans , Jordan , Linear Models , Male , Odontometry , Prognosis , Reference Standards , Sex Characteristics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...