The current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal malignancies.

This is a review of the current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and what to expect from this evolving field in the future. Individualized medicine is moving from broad panel testing of numerous genes or gene products in tumor biopsy samples, identifying biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response, to relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy assays, building on what we have learned in our tumor analysis and growing into its own evolving predictive and prognostic subspecialty. Hence, the field of GI precision oncology is exploding, and this review endeavors to summarize where we are now in preparation for the journey ahead.

Single-Center Analysis of Characteristics and Outcomes of De Novo, Concurrent, and Transformed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), either concurrent with or transformed from indolent lymphoma, treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone are described in retrospective studies. The efficacy of other regimens in transformed or concurrent DLBCL is largely unknown. In this single-center retrospective study, we present characteristics of concurrent and transformed DLBCL and outcomes after dose-adjusted etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and doxorubicin with rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) comparative with de novo DLBCL. Of 170 patients with DLBCL, 136 were de novo, 17 were concurrent, and 17 were transformed. Transformed DLBCL had significantly lower complete response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) but similar overall survival (OS) compared with de novo counterpart. There was no significant difference between de novo and concurrent DLBCL regarding response rates, PFS, and OS. DA-EPOCH-R was associated with inferior OS. Thus, intensified treatment with DA-EPOCH-R might not improve outcomes of transformed DLBCL.

Clearance of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in HCV-Associated Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Improved hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance due to directly acting antiviral agents has led to remarkably improved outcomes of indolent HCV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The impact of directly acting antivirals on the outcomes of aggressive NHL is still under investigation. Characteristics of HCV-associated NHL in black patients are not well characterized. We report outcomes of HCV-associated NHL compared to their HCV-negative counterparts in a predominantly black population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with lymphoma between January 2007 and December 2017 were retrospectively studied. Depending on presence or absence of HCV RNA, patients were grouped into HCV positive (HCV+) and HCV negative (HCV-) cohorts. Depending on virologic clearance (VC), HCV+ were classified into HCV+ with VC and HCV+ without VC. Overall response rate (ORR), complete response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of HCV+ patients with and without VC were compared to HCV- patients. RESULTS: Of 397 patients with lymphoma, 40 had HCV. Black comprised 90% of HCV+ patients. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was most frequent (47%) in the HCV+ group. HCV+ patients without VC had significantly worse OS and PFS compared to HCV- patients. There were no differences in ORR, complete response, PFS, and OS of HCV+ patients with VC and HCV- patients. These results were consistent in subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and aggressive lymphoma. CONCLUSION: HCV clearance is positively associated with lymphoma outcomes in black patients. Patients who clear HCV have noninferior outcomes to HCV- patients, while those who fail to clear HCV have significantly worse outcomes.

Biomarkers for immune therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade of pro-grammed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has substantially increased the number of anticancer agents in our arsenal. However, these therapies are not effective in all cancer types, benefitting only a subset of patients with susceptible, immunogenic cancers. This problem is especially significant in gastrointestinal malignancies, which infrequently respond to immunotherapy. Although we clearly need more accurate biomarkers to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibition in gastrointestinal cancers, the established markers of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and tumor mutational burden are good starting points to identify patients who may benefit. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, Epstein-Barr virus, and the stool microbiome are candidates for future immuno-oncology biomarkers in gastrointestinal malignancies. The availability of better biomarkers will improve patient selection for immunotherapy; it will also improve the design of clinical trials of agents intended for this population of patients, who require more effective treatment options.