Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 35(2): 102-108, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35050918

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a quality improvement bundle focusing on prevention is effective in reducing pressure injury (PI) incidence or costs or delaying PI onset. METHODS: A combined retrospective/prospective cohort study was performed at an academic tertiary care ICU on all patients admitted with a length of stay longer than 48 hours and Braden scale score of 18 or less. Following retrospective data collection (preintervention), a multimodal quality improvement bundle focusing on PI prevention through leadership initiatives, visual tools, and staff/patient education was developed, and data were prospectively collected (postintervention). RESULTS: Statistical and cost analyses were performed comparing both cohorts. A total of 930 patients met the study inclusion criteria (preintervention, n = 599; postintervention, n = 331). A significant decrease in PI incidence was observed from preintervention (n = 37 [6%]) to postintervention (n = 7 [2%], P = .005). This led to a predicted yearly cost savings of $826,810. Further, a significant increase in time to PI occurrence was observed from preintervention (mean, 5 days) to postintervention (mean, 9 days; P = .04). Staff were compliant with the bundle implementation 80% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the quality improvement bundle focused on multimodal PI prevention in critically ill patients led to a significant reduction in PI incidence, increased time to PI occurrence, and was cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Pressure Ulcer , Quality Improvement , Humans , Incidence , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
2.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 72: 101901, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636581

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disparities in cancer survival exist between groups. This study aims to examine these disparities in stage-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and socioeconomic-specific colon cancer net survival in California for adults diagnosed between 2004 and 2011. METHODS: We estimated age-standardized net survival using the Pohar Perme estimator for colon cancer by stage at diagnosis (localized, regional, and distant), sex, race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic), and socioeconomic status (SES). Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on adults diagnosed with malignant colon cancer during 2004-2011 in California were included (n = 78,285). County-level SES was approximated using quintile groupings based on the Federal Poverty Level. RESULTS: Five-year survival for all included adults was 66.0 % (95 % CI: 65.6 %-66.4 %). The difference between Non-Hispanic White (White) adults and Non-Hispanic Black (Black) adults was 9.3 %, and between White adults and Hispanic adults was 3.4 %. A higher proportion of Black (24.5 %) and Hispanic (21.4 %) adults were diagnosed with distant disease compared to White adults (19.4 %). Differences in sex-specific survival were minimal, with only differences between Hispanic men (62.0 % [60.5 %-63.4 %]) and women (65.9 % [64.4 %-67.3 %]). SES differences were largest between the lowest quintile 63.0 % (62.3 %-65.2 %) and the highest quintile 67.8 % (66.8 %-68.8 %). SES-, stage-, and race/ethnicity-stratified analysis demonstrated improving trends for White adults with localized and regional disease, and Hispanic adults with regional disease. CONCLUSION: Colon cancer survival in California is lower for Black and Hispanic adults than for White adults in all three categories: stage, sex, and SES, suggesting the need for improved health policy for Hispanic and Black adults.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California/epidemiology , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/ethnology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Sex Distribution , Social Class , Survival Analysis , White People/statistics & numerical data
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(8): 917-925, 2020 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate if and what social media use influences our patients' decisions to undergo breast augmentation. OBJECTIVES: A single-institution study was designed to evaluate women who underwent elective breast augmentation from 2017 to 2018. METHODS: Patients were contacted via validated, prompted telephone survey. Data regarding their demographic information and social media utilization pertaining to breast augmentation were collected after obtaining verbal consent. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 180 patients, of which 69% participated in the survey. Ninety-seven percent of the participants reported utilizing social media in general; the most common platforms were Facebook, Instagram, and the physician's website. Millennials (97%) and Generation X (92%) utilized social media the most and none of the baby boomers. Sixty-four percent of participants reported utilizing some form of social media to research breast augmentation, with the most common resource being Instagram. When analyzing the impact of the social media resources utilized by the participants, Instagram was reported as the most impactful at 54%. Only 18% of participants were utilizing a physician's social media account to research breast augmentation. Among the 50% of patients who utilized social media to compare their surgeon's work with another physician's, the majority (83%) were utilizing the physician's website. CONCLUSIONS: Social media influences patients' education and decisions to undergo breast augmentation, with Instagram being the most impactful. This study evaluated the patient population to stay up to date on their social media utilization and resources of education prior to breast augmentation.


Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Social Media , Female , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Clin Chim Acta ; 462: 6-14, 2016 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27553856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Remnant lipoproteins (RLP) are a metabolically derived subpopulation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) in human blood that are involved in the metabolism of dietary fats or triglycerides. RLP, the smaller and denser variants of TRL particles, are strongly correlated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and were listed as an emerging atherogenic risk factor by the AHA in 2001. METHODS: Varying analytical techniques used in clinical studies in the size determination of RLP contribute to conflicting hypotheses in regard to whether larger or smaller RLP particles contribute to CVD progression, though multiple pathways may exist. RESULTS: We demonstrated a unique combinatorial bioanalytical approach involving the preparative immunoseparation of RLP, and dynamic light scattering for size distribution analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This is a new facile and robust methodology for the size distribution analysis of RLP that in conjunction with clinical studies may reveal the mechanisms by which RLP cause CVD progression.


Subject(s)
Dynamic Light Scattering , Lipoproteins/analysis , Particle Size , Humans , Molecular Structure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...