Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Pediatr Oncol ; 33(6): 530-5, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10573575

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standard cytogenetic techniques are time-consuming and often not informative with solid tumors. In contrast, the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a readily available technique that can rapidly detect tumor-specific chromosomal rearrangements, even in small biopsy specimens. We present cases depicting the importance of including molecular diagnostic studies in the routine evaluation of pediatric solid tumors. PROCEDURE: We used RT-PCR to detect chimeric transcripts specific for major pediatric solid tumors, including peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pPNET), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), and desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT). We reviewed six recent cases in which the initial diagnosis was changed by the results of RT-PCR. RESULTS: Highly unusual or nonspecific clinical and/or histopathologic findings led to the initial diagnoses of neuroblastoma in three patients and DSRCT, leukemia, and carcinoma in one patient each. The final diagnoses after RT-PCR studies were pPNET in three patients, ARMS in two patients, and DSRCT in one patient. RT-PCR results led to early corrections in the diagnosis in two patients, but four patients received treatment not considered optimal for the neoplasms ultimately diagnosed, including three who, despite presenting with localized tumors that have a >70% cure rate with standard therapy, have died or are dying of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic studies on solid tumors can clarify the diagnosis in seemingly straightforward as well as in overtly problematic cases. These diagnostic distinctions are now critical as disease-specific and risk-directed therapies have emerged.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/diagnosis , Leukemia/diagnosis , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive/diagnosis , Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/diagnosis , Sarcoma, Small Cell/diagnosis , Translocation, Genetic/genetics , Adolescent , Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis , Carcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma/metabolism , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Infant , Leukemia/genetics , Leukemia/metabolism , Male , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive/genetics , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive/metabolism , Predictive Value of Tests , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/genetics , Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/metabolism , Sarcoma, Small Cell/genetics , Sarcoma, Small Cell/metabolism
2.
Cancer Res ; 59(7): 1428-32, 1999 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10197607

ABSTRACT

The t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation is present in up to 95% of cases of Ewing's sarcoma and results in the formation of an EWS-FLI1 fusion gene which encodes a chimeric transcription factor. The proximate role of EWS-FLI1 in the pathogenesis of Ewing's sarcoma is thought to involve the activation of as yet largely unknown target genes. Many alternative forms of EWS-FLI1 exist because of variations in the locations of the EWS and FLI1 genomic breakpoints. The most common form, designated "type 1," consists of the first seven exons of EWS joined to exons 6-9 of FLI1 and accounts for approximately 60% of cases. The "type 2" EWS-FLI1 fusion also includes FLI1 exon 5 and is present in another 25%. We and others have observed previously that the type 1 fusion is associated with a significantly better prognosis than the other fusion types. Because EWS-FLI1 is an aberrant transcription factor, we investigated whether these differences in clinical behavior may be correlated to functional differences by comparing transactivation by the type 1 EWS-FLI1 with other types in both heterologous cells (HeLa, NIH3T3) and homologous cells (Ewing's sarcoma cell lines). In a panel of seven Ewing's sarcoma cell lines, we found transactivation of a transiently transfected FLI1-responsive reporter construct to be significantly lower in cell lines with the type 1 fusion than in cell lines with the type 2 fusion (P = 0.003). Cotransfection of the same reporter construct with each of a series of seven EWS-FLI1 expression constructs (corresponding to the two major fusion types and five less common types) also showed that type 1 EWS-FLI1 was a significantly weaker transactivator than the type 2 product in both HeLa and NIH3T3 cells (P = 0.003, and P = 0.033, respectively). Electromobility shift assays showed equivalent binding of the type 1 and type 2 EWS-FLI1 to the consensus FLI1-responsive binding site, indicating that differences in transactivation were not due simply to differences in DNA binding affinity. The finding that the type 1 EWS-FLI1 fusion, associated with less aggressive clinical behavior, encodes a less active chimeric transcription factor may provide the basis for a molecular explanation of clinical heterogeneity in Ewing's sarcoma.


Subject(s)
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/physiology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins , Sarcoma, Ewing/genetics , Transcription Factors/physiology , Transcriptional Activation , 3T3 Cells , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Exons , HeLa Cells , Humans , Mice , Proto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1 , RNA-Binding Protein EWS , Trans-Activators/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...