Limited total arc range of motion increases sheer stress in the shoulder while pitching in collegiate baseball pitchers.

CONTEXT: Upper extremity injuries in baseball pitchers cause significant time-loss from competing and decreased quality of life. Although shoulder range of motion (ROM) is reported as a key factor to prevent potential injury, it remains unclear how limited glenohumeral ROM affects pitching biomechanics which may contribute to upper extremity injuries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM of the throwing arm differed in upper extremity pitching kinematics and kinetics as well as ball velocity compared to pitchers with greater levels of glenohumeral ROM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven baseball pitchers (ages 18-24) were divided into either control (≧160° total arc) or lower ROM (<160° total arc) groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The mean glenohumeral ROM deficits, pitching kinematic and kinetic outcomes, and ball velocity were compared between groups. RESULTS: The control group demonstrated significantly less deficit in total arc ROM between arms than the lower ROM (Control: -1.5±10.0°, Lower ROM: -12.4±13.9°, p<.001). While, the lower ROM group displayed less maximal shoulder external rotation (ER) while pitching, the control group had significantly less difference in ROM between maximal shoulder ER while pitching and clinically-measured ER (Lower ROM: 64.4±12.1°, Control: 55.8±16.6°, p=.025). The control group had significantly faster ball velocity compared to the lower ROM group (Control: 85.0 ± 4.3mph, Lower ROM: 82.4 ± 4.8mph, p=.024). CONCLUSION: Pitchers with decreased total arc glenohumeral ROM (<160° total arc) may undergo over-stretching toward ER in the shoulder during the late cocking phase. Pitchers with higher total arc ROM can pitch the same or faster ball without increasing loading in the upper extremity. Total arc glenohumeral ROM measurement can be a clinical screening tool to monitor shoulder condition over the time, and pitchers with limited total arc ROM might be at higher risk of shoulder injury.

Kinematic and kinetic comparison between preprofessional pitchers from the Dominican Republic and the United States.

Introduction: Pitching biomechanical efficiency is defined as the association between pitch velocity and arm kinetics. Pitching mechanics inefficiency, an increase in arm kinetics without the resultant increase in pitch velocity, can lead to increased arm strain, increasing arm injury risk. The purpose of this study was to compare arm kinetics, elbow varus torque and shoulder force, in preprofessional United States (US) and Dominican Republic (DR) pitchers. Kinematics that are known to influence elbow varus torque and shoulder force as well as a representative of pitch velocity (hand velocity) were also compared. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on baseball pitchers from the DR and US who participated in biomechanical evaluations conducted by the University biomechanics laboratory personnel. Three-dimensional biomechanical analyses were performed on US (n = 37) and DR (n = 37) baseball pitchers. Potential differences between US and DR pitchers were assessed through analysis of covariance with 95% confidence intervals [95% confidence Interval (CI)]. Results: Preprofessional DR pitchers experienced increased elbow varus torque compared with their US counterparts [DR: 7.5 (1.1); US: 5.9 (1.1) %BWxH; Beta: -2.0 (95% CI: -2.7, -1.2) %BWxH], despite throwing fastballs with slower hand velocity [DR: 3,967.1 (939.4); US: 5,109.1 (613.8) °/s; Beta: 1,129.5 (95% CI: 677.5, 1,581.4) °/s]. DR and US pitchers demonstrated similar shoulder force [DR: 136.8 (23.8); US: 155.0 (25.7); Beta: 0.4 (95% CI: -1.2, 19.7) %BW]. Discussion: Increased elbow varus torque although decreased hand velocity suggests inefficient pitching mechanics among DR pitchers. Inefficient pitching mechanics and increased elbow torque should be considered when developing training programs and pitching plans for professional pitchers from the Dominican Republic.

A Comparison of Pitching Biomechanics and Sport Specialization in High School Pitchers.

Background: The prevalence of sport specialization in high school athletes continues to rise, particularly among baseball players. Previous research has focused on the incidence of injury among specialized and non-specialized athletes but has yet to examine the level of sport specialization and pitching biomechanics. Hypotheses/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in pitching volume and biomechanics between low-, moderate-, and high-level specialized baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that high-level specialized pitchers would have the most pitching volume within the current and previous years while low-level specialized pitchers would exhibit the least amount. The second hypothesis states that kinematics and kinetics commonly associated with performance and injury risk would differ between low-, moderate-, and high-level specialized pitchers. Study Design: Case-Control Study. Methods: Thirty-six high school baseball pitchers completed a custom sport specialization questionnaire before participating in a three-dimensional pitching motion analysis. Sport specialization was based off current guidelines and categorized as low-, moderate-, and high-level specialized based upon self-reported outcomes. Pitchers then threw ≈10 fastballs from a mound engineered to professional specifications. Data averaged across fastballs was used for biomechanics variables. Key pitching biomechanical and pitching volume variables were compared between low-, moderate-, and high-level specialized pitchers. Results: High-level specialized pitchers were older (p = 0.003), had larger body mass (p = 0.05) and BMI (p = 0.045), and threw faster (p = 0.01) compared to low-level specialized pitchers. Pitching volume and pitching biomechanics were similar across groups. Conclusions: Pitching biomechanics were similar across groups, although high-level specialized pitchers threw with significantly higher throwing velocity compared to low-level pitchers. The low amount of pitching volume throughout the season may be responsible for the lack of additional observed differences. Further research should examine the relationship between pitching biomechanics, upper extremity strength and flexibility, and sport specialization. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Comparison of Biomechanical Factors Before and After UCL Surgery in Baseball Athletes: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) and repair (UCLr) are the gold standards in the treatment of UCL injuries. Although return-to-play timelines after UCLR have been established, pitching biomechanical variables are speculated to change after surgical intervention. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To synthesize the literature and investigate changes in pitching biomechanics in baseball pitchers after UCLR or UCLr. We hypothesized that differences in pitching biomechanics would be observed for both intra- and interpatient comparisons. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We searched 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Sports Medicine & Education Index) from inception to February 2020. Data extracted included author and year of publication, study design, sample size, study population, and primary outcome variables. Meta-analysis was performed to produce random pooled effect sizes (▵). RESULTS: We identified 1010 original articles for inclusion. A total of 5 studies were included in the systematic review; of these, 3 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No differences were found in shoulder range of motion (ROM) between post-UCLR and control pitchers (dominant arm external rotation ▵, 0.13°; 95% CI, -0.15° to 4.02°; P = .36); dominant arm internal rotation ▵, -0.20°; 95% CI, -0.74° to 0.35°; P = .48). Mean fastball velocity as well as pitches thrown decreased after UCLR in professional pitchers. Significant differences in elbow extension, elbow extension velocity, and shoulder internal rotation velocity were found among amateur pitchers. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that limited differences exist in pitchers before and after UCLR as well as in post-UCLR pitchers and healthy, age-matched controls. UCLR may influence throwing velocity, but it had no effect on either the throwing biomechanics or theROM of baseball pitchers. Although trends appear to be forming, further evidence is needed to understand the effect of UCLR on throwing biomechanics.