Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 97(8): 464-472, ago. 2022.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-209097

ABSTRACT

Las queratitis infecciosas (QI) son una de las causas más comunes de ceguera a nivel mundial, especialmente en países en vías de desarrollo, y puede llegar a representar del 5,1 al 32,3% de todas las indicaciones de queratoplastia penetrante. Sin embargo, realizar una queratoplastia terapéutica «en caliente» está asociado con una mayor incidencia de recurrencia de la QI y rechazo del injerto. El tratamiento estándar incluye antimicrobianos (ATM) de amplio espectro y, una vez identificado el patógeno causante y el antibiograma, continuar con un tratamiento dirigido, según la sensibilidad del germen. La aparición de cepas multirresistentes a los ATM está aumentando progresivamente a un ritmo alarmante en los últimos tiempos. Asimismo, la diversidad de los microorganismos causantes (bacterias, hongos, parásitos, virus) dificulta en ocasiones la realización de un diagnóstico clínico correcto, retrasando el inicio de un tratamiento efectivo. Se estima que solo un 50% de los ojos tendrá un buen resultado visual si se retrasa la terapia. En definitiva, todos estos factores hacen que sea muy importante la identificación de alternativas al tratamiento ATM. Por las propiedades ATM del cromóforo fotoactivado (riboflavina) y la luz ultravioleta de longitud de onda 200-400nm, utilizada en múltiples aplicaciones médicas y no médicas para la desinfección, se ha propuesto el cromóforo fotoactivado para el cross-linking corneal en el tratamiento de las QI, como una herramienta adicional en el arsenal terapéutico de las QI. Debe diferenciarse del cross-linking empleado para el manejo del queratocono progresivo. El objetivo de esta revisión es actualizar la evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad del cromóforo fotoactivado para el cross-linking en las QI (AU)


Infectious keratitis (IK) is one of the most common causes of monocular blindness worldwide, especially in developing countries, and may account for 5.1 to 32.3% of all indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, performing a therapeutic PK on a “hot eye” is associated with a higher incidence of IK recurrence and graft rejection. Standard treatment includes antimicrobials (ATM) and, once the causative pathogen has been identified, must be continued with targeted treatment, depending on antibiogram sensitivity. However, appearance of multiresistant strains to ATM is progressively increasing at an alarming rate. Besides that, the diversity of the causative microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) may hinder the clinical diagnosis and secondarily the proper treatment from the beginning. It is estimated that only 50% of eyes will have a good visual result if the correct therapy is delayed. All these factors make the identification of alternatives to ATM treatment of paramount importance. Due to the ATM properties of photoactivated chromophore (riboflavin) and ultraviolet light of wavelength 200-400nm, used in multiple medical and non-medical applications for disinfection, photoactivated chromophore for corneal cross-linking (CXL) of IK, as an addition to the therapeutic arsenal for the management of IK has been proposed. It must be differentiated from CXL used for the management of progressive keratoconus. The objective of this review is to update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of photoactivated chromophore for corneal CXL in IKs (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Eye Infections, Bacterial/diagnosis , Keratitis/drug therapy , Keratitis/microbiology , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Linking Reagents/therapeutic use , Collagen/therapeutic use , Visual Acuity
2.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 97(8): 464-472, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752596

ABSTRACT

Infectious keratitis (IK) is one of the most common causes of monocular blindness worldwide, especially in developing countries and may account for 5.1%-32.3% of all indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, performing a therapeutic PK on a "hot eye" is associated with a higher incidence of IK recurrence and graft rejection. Standard treatment includes antimicrobials (ATM) and, once the causative pathogen has been identified, must be continued with targeted treatment, depending on antibiogram sensitivity. However, appearance of multiresistant strains to ATM is progressively increasing at an alarming rate. Besides that, the diversity of the causative microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) may hinder the clinical diagnosis and secondarily the proper treatment from the beginning. It is estimated that only 50% of eyes will have a good visual result if the correct therapy is delayed. All these factors make the identification of alternatives to ATM treatment of paramount importance. Due to the ATM properties of photoactivated chromophore (riboflavin, RB) and ultraviolet (UV) light of wavelength (λ) 200-400 nanometers (nm), used in multiple medical and non-medical applications for disinfection, photoactivated chromophore for corneal cross-linking (CXL) of IK (PACK-CXL), as an addition to the therapeutic arsenal for the management of IK has been proposed. It must be differentiated from CXL used for the management of progressive keratoconus (KC). The objective of this review is to update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of PACK-CXL in IKs.


Subject(s)
Eye Infections, Bacterial , Keratitis , Photochemotherapy , Collagen/therapeutic use , Cornea , Cross-Linking Reagents/therapeutic use , Eye Infections, Bacterial/diagnosis , Humans , Keratitis/drug therapy , Keratitis/microbiology , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...