Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the statistically normal range of corneal Young's modulus in young healthy eyes in vivo, and to establish if this variation has a clinically significant influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using applanation tonometry. METHODS: Central corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), and applanation IOP (Goldmann tonometer) were measured using standard clinical techniques in one eye of 100 normal human subjects (22.0 +/- 2.9 years) in vivo. The Orssengo-Pye algorithm was used to calculate the corneal Young's modulus of these experimental subjects, and to produce a theoretical model of potential errors in Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of IOP due to variations of Young's modulus and CCT. RESULTS: Corneal Young's modulus was 0.29 +/- 0.06 MPa [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.40 MPa]. According to the Orssengo-Pye model, the relationship between Young's modulus and the error in applanation IOP is linear; the slope was 23 mm Hg per MPa. An increase from the minimum to the maximum value of the calculated limits of agreement (95% CI) of Young's modulus caused a variation in applanation IOP of 5.35 mm Hg. The anticipated error at the extremes of the limits of agreement (95% CI) of CCT was similar at 4.67 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Physiological variations in corneal Young's modulus may cause clinically significant errors in Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of IOP.

The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) using the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), compared with the Goldmann tonometer. METHODS: Thirty young healthy subjects (23.0 +/- 3.0 years) were recruited from the student population at the University of New South Wales. Thick hydroxyethyl methacrylate contact lenses were worn monocularly for 2 hours under closed-eye conditions to induce corneal edema via hypoxia. IOP (Goldmann and Pascal DCT), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in both eyes before and after lens wear. Paired t-tests, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman plots were used to identify changes in, and relationships between, these parameters resulting from corneal edema. RESULTS: Lens wear resulted in statistically significant changes in CCT (+48.3 +/- 14.4 microm, p < 0.001), Goldmann IOP (+1.5 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, p = 0.007), and Pascal DCT IOP (-0.7 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, p = 0.001) but not OPA (0.0 +/- 0.3 mm Hg, p = 0.721, two-tailed paired t-test). The Pascal DCT provided IOP readings that were 1.3 +/- 2.0 mm Hg higher than the Goldmann IOP readings when hydration was normal, but the Goldmann tonometer provided readings that were 0.8 +/- 2.5 mm Hg higher than the Pascal DCT readings when the cornea was edematous. The variation between the two instruments was weakly correlated to the change in CCT (r = -0.261, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens-induced corneal edema caused a small underestimation error in IOP measurements by the Pascal DCT, and an overestimation error in Goldmann tonometry measurements. The OPA measurement provided by the Pascal DCT is insensitive to corneal edema-induced changes in corneal properties.

The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements.

AIM: To determine the effect of small increases in corneal hydration on the accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure (IOP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five young healthy subjects presented on 3 separate days approximately 1 week apart. On 2 visits, subjects were required to wear a hydrogel contact lens with either a center thickness of 0.3 and 0.7 mm (HEMA 38% water content, parallel surface curve) in 1 eye only under closed-eye conditions for 2 hours to induce corneal swelling. The third visit acted as a control. IOP, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature were measured in both eyes before and after contact lens wear on all visits. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in corneal thickness of 40.2+/-14.4 microm (P<0.001) and 41.9+/-16.4 microm (P<0.001) after wearing the 0.3 and 0.7 mm thick contact lenses, respectively (2-tailed paired t test). There was an increase in IOP of 2.8+/-2.2 mm Hg (P<0.001) after wearing the 0.3 mm thick contact lens, and a statistically insignificant difference of 1.3+/-3.0 mm Hg (P=0.058) after wearing the 0.7 mm thick contact lens (2-tailed paired t test). There was a statistically significant Pearson correlation between the change in corneal thickness and the change in IOP after lens wear (r=0.500, P<0.001, 0.3 mm lens and r=0.399, P<0.001, 0.7 mm lens). The corneal hydration-induced measurement error was 0.46 mm Hg per 10 microm change in corneal thickness (0.3 mm lens) and 0.35 mm Hg per 10 microm change in corneal thickness (0.7 mm lens). CONCLUSION: A small increase in corneal hydration and thickness may cause a clinically significant overestimation of IOP when measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry.