Changing frontline AML treatment patterns from 2013 to 2022.

The treatment patterns for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were compared between 2013 and 16 and 2021-22 in a real-world setting. A significantly higher proportion of patients age 70 and over received non-intensive therapy (NIT) in 2021-22 as compared with 2013-16 (65 % vs 44 %, p = 0.014), with a corresponding reduction in the proportion receiving either intensive therapy or no antileukemic treatment. Treatment patterns among patients < age 70 were unchanged. The complete response rate in the NIT group was 69 % in 2021-22 vs. 24 % in 2013-16 (p < 0.001); the overall survival (OS) of NIT patients was 11.5 months in 2021-22 vs. 7.8 months in 2013-16. Older patients from rural areas were more likely to decline therapy than those from urban regions. The increase in the proportion of patients opting for NIT may be related to the availability of more effective treatment options. Although outcomes are improving, the OS with NIT remains suboptimal.

Incremental value of the bone marrow trephine biopsy in detecting residual leukemia following treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Most guidelines suggest that only the bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is necessary to assess residual disease following intensive chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with the bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMTB) recommended in cases of a poor quality BMA. We performed a retrospective study evaluating this in a cohort of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML. Residual disease was assessed by morphological examination of the BMA and BMTB±immunohistochemistry. Of the 647 marrows 32.6% were interim marrows performed prior to peripheral count recovery, 41.7% were end of induction (EOI) marrows and the remaining were 'other marrows'. The BMA and BMTB findings were concordant in 92.8% of cases. The BMTB led to a change in diagnosis from 'no leukemia' to 'residual leukemia' in 5.2% of interim, 3.7% of EOI and 2.4% of 'other' marrows. The BMA alone had a sensitivity of 86.8% in detecting residual leukemia and of 82.3%, 82.5% and 94.2% for interim, EOI and 'other marrows', respectively. Despite the high concordance between the BMA and the BMTB the poor sensitivity of the BMA in detecting residual leukemia, particularly at EOI, may lead to an overestimation of the complete remission rates which may have therapeutic and clinical trial implications.

The fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG) chemotherapy regimen is an alternative to anthracycline-based therapy for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia for patients with pre-existing cardiac disease.

We conducted a retrospective study assessing FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) as first-line treatment in 56 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients considered ineligible for anthracycline-based treatment due to advanced age, significant comorbidities, or pre-existing cardiac disease. The median age was 69 (21-80); 46% received FLAG for pre-existing cardiac disease and others due to age (32%), non-cardiac comorbidities (20%), or previous anthracycline exposure (2%). The induction mortality was 16% and, among evaluable patients, 48% achieved a complete remission after the first induction course with an additional patient achieving a remission after a second course for a total complete remission rate of 50%. Four patients proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant including two with pre-existing cardiac disease. Among non-transplanted patients, the relapse rate (RR) was 47%. When censored at time of stem cell transplant, the median relapse-free survival was 14.7 months. The median overall survival was 9.3 months with 1- and 2-yr survivals of 44% and 22%, respectively. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between patients treated with FLAG for cardiac reasons vs. other reasons. In conclusion, FLAG is a useful alternative to anthracycline-based induction for Acute myeloid leukemia in those with significant comorbidities including pre-existing cardiac disease.

Effect of capecitabine on mean corpuscular volume in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Capecitabine is a novel oral chemotherapy agent designed to generate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) preferentially in tumor tissue, and is the most effective therapy for anthracycline and taxane-resistant breast cancer. Macrocytosis has not been previously reported in association with capecitabine therapy. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving standard 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine therapy at a single center during the year 2000. Patients were assessed prior to each cycle with clinical examinations and complete blood counts. Seventy-six women (median age 52 years, median follow-up 273 days) met inclusion criteria for the study. Prior to treatment, the average mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was 91.6 fl (normal range 80-100 fl). During chemotherapy, MCV increased in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. Fifty-seven percent of study patients developed macrocytosis (MCV > 100 fl) while on capecitabine therapy; 85% of women who received at least nine cycles of therapy exhibited macrocytosis. Development of macrocytosis was independent of anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, liver metastasis, and hepatic dysfunction; however, increases in MCV were more pronounced in 5-FU-naive patients. Alternative causes of macrocytosis were not identified in patients without coexisting anemia. We conclude that capecitabine therapy produces time-dependent and dose-dependent macrocytosis in MBC patients. However, macrocytosis was not associated with anemia or overt myelosuppression. When capecitabine-treated breast cancer patients develop macrocytosis in the absence of anemia, investigations of other causes of macrocytosis are not warranted.