Are we being drowned by overhydration advice on the Internet?

OBJECTIVE: Because inappropriate recommendations about hydration during exercise appear widespread and potentially dangerous, we assessed the quality of a sampling of information currently available to the public on the Internet. METHODS: Internet searches using the Google search engine were conducted using the terms "hydration," "hydration guidelines," "drinking fluids" and "drinking guidelines" combined with "and exercise." From the first 50 websites for each search phrase, duplicates were removed yielding 141 unique websites that were categorized by source and examined for specific hydration related information and recommendations. RESULTS: Correct endorsement was as follows (reported as percent endorsing the concept relative to the number of websites addressing the issue): some weight loss should be expected during exercise (69.5% of 95), fluid consumption during exercise should be based upon thirst (7.3% of 110), electrolyte intake is not generally necessary during exercise (10.4% of 106), dehydration is not generally a cause of heat illness (3.4% of 58) or exercise-associated muscle cramping (2.4% of 42), exercise-associated muscle cramping is not generally related to electrolyte loss (0.0% of 16), and overhydration is a risk for hyponatremia (100.0% of 61). Comparison of website information from medical or scientific sources with that from other sources revealed no differences (p = 0.4 to 1.0) in the frequency of correct endorsement of the examined criteria. CONCLUSION: Prevalent misinformation on the Internet about hydration needs during exercise and the contribution of hydration status to the development of heat illness and muscle cramping fosters overhydration. In general, those websites that should be most trusted by the public were no better than other websites at providing accurate information, and the potential risk of hyponatremia from overhydration was noted by less than half the websites. Since deaths from exercise-associated hyponatremia should be preventable through avoidance of overhydration, dissemination of a more appropriate hydration message is important.

Triple-hop distance as a valid predictor of lower limb strength and power.

CONTEXT: Hop tests are functional tests that reportedly require strength, power, and postural stability to perform. The extent to which a triple-hop distance (THD) test measures each of these characteristics is relatively unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which the THD predicts performance on clinical measures of power, strength, and balance in athletic individuals. DESIGN: Within-subjects correlational study. SETTING: Station-based, preseason screening of athletes. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I-AA men's and women's soccer student-athletes (20 women, 20 men; age = 20.0 +/- 1.4 years, height = 172.8 +/- 9.2 cm, mass = 71.9 +/- 8.9 kg). INTERVENTION(S): As part of a comprehensive preseason screening of athletes, participants completed the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) test, 3 trials each of the THD and vertical jump, and 5 repetitions each of concentric isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength testing at 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s. Bivariate correlations and linear regression analyses determined the extent to which THD (cm) predicted each of the strength, power, and balance measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maximal vertical jump height (cm), total BESS error scores, and quadriceps (Quad(60), Quad(180)) and hamstrings (Ham(60), Ham(180)) isokinetic maximum peak torque (Nm) at 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s, respectively. RESULTS: Triple-hop distance was a strong predictor of vertical jump height, explaining 69.5% of the variance (P < .01). THD also predicted 56.7% of the variance in Ham(60) (P < .01), 55.5% of the variance in Ham(180) (P < .01), 49.0% of the variance in Quad(60) (P < .01), and 58.8% of the variance in Quad(180) (P < .01). No relationships between THD and BESS scores were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Triple-hop distance is a useful clinical test to predict an athlete's lower extremity strength and power. Although THD was not a predictor of static balance, further research is needed to examine its relationship with more dynamic balance tests.