ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early graft failure (EGF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) occurs in up to 12% of grafts, but is often clinically unapparent. EGF may result in perioperative myocardial infarction with consequently increased mortality. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence of clinically apparent EGF in patients undergoing CABG and the influence on mortality. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of consecutive patients undergoing CABG from January 2015 to December 2018 with respect to postoperative emergency coronary angiography (CAG) due to suspected EGF and 30-day mortality. Patients with CAG-documented EGF were matched to patients without EGF to examine predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The analysis included 5638 patients undergoing CABG. Eighty-six patients (1.5%) underwent emergency CAG due to suspected EGF. Clinically apparent EGF was observed in 61 of these patients (70.9%), whereas 14 (16.3%) had a culprit lesion in a native coronary artery. The majority of patients (n = 45; 52.3%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and 31 (36%) underwent re-do CABG. The remaining patients were treated conservatively. The 30-day mortality rate of suspected EGF patients undergoing CAG was 22.4% (n = 19), which was higher than the mortality rate of 2.8% overall (P<.001); this remained higher after matching the EGF patients with the control group (11 [20.4%] vs 2 [4.0%]; P=.02). CONCLUSION: Emergency CAG after CABG is rare and is primarily carried out in patients with EGF. The 30-day mortality rate of these patients is high, and EGF is an independent predictor of mortality. Perioperative CAG with subsequent treatment is mandatory in these patients.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Epidermal Growth Factor , Treatment Outcome , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complicationsABSTRACT
AIMS: In the present study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan) as "add-on" treatment in congestive heart failure (CHF) in daily practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this open-label, multicenter study 414 CHF outpatients (NYHA II/III) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 40% and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels > 200 pg/ml at baseline were enrolled. Patients were treated with standard therapy including at least one angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in addition to another CHF drug; 91% of the patients received beta-blockers. Candesartan was uptitrated to 32 mg/day (target dose if tolerated) during 6 weeks followed by constant dosing over 16 weeks. The primary endpoint plasma BNP was significantly reduced by 25% at week 22 (from 394 to 295 pg/ml, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Candesartan produced early and sustained improvements of plasma BNP/NT-pro-BNP, LVEF, and quality of life (SF-36) compared to baseline. Of patients on beta-blockers, 37% improved towards NYHA II/I at week 22 (P < 0.0001) and 53.5% of the patients in NYHA III at baseline improved into NYHA II/I at week 22 (n = 232, P < 0.0001). Candesartan was well tolerated; no unexpected findings were reported besides known adverse reactions including hypotension, hyperkalemia, and serum creatinine elevations. CONCLUSION: Candesartan "add-on" treatment provides a good benefit/risk ratio in CHF outpatients in daily practice, although high-risk patients should be managed with frequent monitoring of BP, serum potassium, and renal function.
