Presence of a remote fear memory engram in the central amygdala.

Fear memory formation and recall are highly regulated processes, with the central amygdala (CeA) contributing to fear memory-related behaviors. We recently reported that a remote fear memory engram is resident in the anterior basolateral amygdala (aBLA). However, the extent to which downstream neurons in the CeA participate in this engram is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that CeA neurons activated during fear memory formation are reactivated during remote memory retrieval such that a CeA engram participates in remote fear memory recall and its associated behavior. Using contextual fear conditioning in TRAP2;Ai14 mice, we identified, by persistent Cre-dependent tdTomato expression (i.e., "TRAPing"), CeA neurons that were c-fos-activated during memory formation. Twenty-one days later, we quantified neurons activated during remote memory recall using Fos immunohistochemistry. Dual labeling was used to identify the subpopulation of CeA neurons that was both activated during memory formation and reactivated during recall. Compared with their context-conditioned (no shock) controls, fear-conditioned (electric shock) mice (n = 5/group) exhibited more robust fear memory-related behavior (freezing) as well as larger populations of activated (tdTomato+) and reactivated (dual-labeled) CeA neurons. Most neurons in both groups were mainly located in the capsular CeA subdivision (CeAC). Notably, however, only the size of the TRAPed population distributed throughout the CeA was significantly correlated with time spent freezing during remote fear memory recall. Our findings indicate that fear memory formation robustly activates CeA neurons and that a subset located mainly in the CeAC may contribute to both remote fear memory storage/retrieval and the resulting fear-like behavior.

Anterior basolateral amygdala neurons comprise a remote fear memory engram.

Introduction: Threatening environmental cues often generate enduring fear memories, but how these are formed and stored remains actively investigated. Recall of a recent fear memory is thought to reflect reactivation of neurons, in multiple brain regions, activated during memory formation, indicating that anatomically distributed and interconnected neuronal ensembles comprise fear memory engrams. The extent to which anatomically specific activation-reactivation engrams persist during long-term fear memory recall, however, remains largely unexplored. We hypothesized that principal neurons in the anterior basolateral amygdala (aBLA), which encode negative valence, acutely reactivate during remote fear memory recall to drive fear behavior. Methods: Using adult offspring of TRAP2 and Ai14 mice, persistent tdTomato expression was used to "TRAP" aBLA neurons that underwent Fos-activation during contextual fear conditioning (electric shocks) or context only conditioning (no shocks) (n = 5/group). Three weeks later, mice were re-exposed to the same context cues for remote memory recall, then sacrificed for Fos immunohistochemistry. Results: TRAPed (tdTomato +), Fos +, and reactivated (double-labeled) neuronal ensembles were larger in fear- than context-conditioned mice, with the middle sub-region and middle/caudal dorsomedial quadrants of aBLA displaying the greatest densities of all three ensemble populations. Whereas tdTomato + ensembles were dominantly glutamatergic in context and fear groups, freezing behavior during remote memory recall was not correlated with ensemble sizes in either group. Discussion: We conclude that although an aBLA-inclusive fear memory engram forms and persists at a remote time point, plasticity impacting electrophysiological responses of engram neurons, not their population size, encodes fear memory and drives behavioral manifestations of long-term fear memory recall.

Kappa opioid receptors regulate hippocampal synaptic homeostasis and epileptogenesis.

OBJECTIVE: Homeostatic synaptic plasticity (HSP) serves as a gain control mechanism at central nervous system (CNS) synapses, including those between the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA3. Improper circuit control of DG-CA3 synapses is hypothesized to underlie epileptogenesis. Here, we sought to (1) identify compounds that preferentially modulate DG-CA3 synapses in primary neuronal culture and (2) determine if these compounds would delay or prevent epileptogenesis in vivo. METHODS: We previously developed and validated an in vitro assay to visualize the behavior of DG-CA3 synapses and predict functional changes. We used this "synapse-on-chip" assay (quantification of synapse size, number, and type using immunocytochemical markers) to dissect the mechanisms of HSP at DG-CA3 synapses. Using chemogenetic constructs and pharmacological agents we determined the signaling cascades necessary for gain control at DG-CA3 synapses. Finally, we tested the implicated cascades (using kappa opioid receptor (OR) agonists and antagonists) in two models of epileptogenesis: electrical amygdala kindling in the mouse and chemical (pentylenetetrazole) kindling in the rat. RESULTS: In vitro, synapses between DG mossy fibers (MFs) and CA3 neurons are the primary homeostatic responders during sustained periods of activity change. Kappa OR signaling is both necessary and sufficient for the homeostatic elaboration of DG-CA3 synapses, induced by presynaptic DG activity levels. Blocking kappa OR signaling in vivo attenuates the development of seizures in both mouse and rat models of epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: This study elucidates mechanisms by which synapses between DG granule cells and CA3 pyramidal neurons undergo activity-dependent homeostatic compensation, via OR signaling in vitro. Modulation of kappa OR signaling in vivo alters seizure progression, suggesting that breakdown of homeostatic closed-loop control at DG-CA3 synapses contributes to seizures, and that targeting endogenous homeostatic mechanisms at DG-CA3 synapses may prove useful in combating epileptogenesis.