Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215748, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30998803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Melatonin stimulates the production of progesterone, which is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Since melatonin in blood is reduced due to work under illuminated conditions during night work, it has been hypothesized that night work may increase the risk of preterm birth. Previous meta-analyses have not revealed increased risk of preterm birth in women working night shifts during pregnancy. Still, these studies might have been limited by inaccurate self-reports of timing, intensity and duration of night work most likely causing bias towards the null. The aim of this is study was to investigate if the frequency and duration of night work during the first (week 1-12) and second (week 13-22) trimester of pregnancy were associated with risk of preterm birth when objective and prospective data on night work are used. METHOD: In a register-based prospective cohort study, we obtained individual day-to-day information on working hours from The Danish Working Hour Database (DWHD, a payroll database including all public service employees in administrative Danish Regions from 2007-2013) and information on preterm birth from the Danish Medical Birth Registry. Night-shift was defined as at least three working hours between 23:00 and 06:00. Preterm birth was defined as giving birth during gestational weeks 23-37. Odds of preterm birth according to working night shifts were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 16,501 pregnant women eligible for the study, of which 10,202 women (61.8%) had at least one night-shift during the first 22 gestational weeks. The risk of preterm birth was not elevated among women working night shifts compared to women working only day shifts during either the first or second trimester. Within night-shift workers, the risk was not related to the number of night shifts, the duration of night shifts, consecutive night shifts or quick returns defined as short intervals between shifts. Odds of preterm birth was not related to change of working schedule from the first to second trimester, although women changing from night shifts in the first trimester to day work only in the second trimester displayed a weak increased odds of preterm birth (OR 1.21, 95%CI 0.98-1.49) compared to women working night shifts in both trimesters. CONCLUSION: Our results, which are without bias from self-report of either exposure or outcome, are in line with the results of previous meta-analyses. Due to the detailed information on hours worked during pregnancy, we were able to investigate several dimensions of night work not previously investigated, of which none were associated with elevated risk of preterm birth.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Trimester, First , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Premature Birth , Registries , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 40(2): 133-45, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24310528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the epidemiologic evidence linking finger and wrist osteoarthritis (OA) with work activities requiring pinch or hand grip or exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV). METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to June 2013. We selected studies assessing the associations of radiographic diagnosed finger and/or wrist joint OA with work activities involving pinch or hand grip or exposure to HAV. We used specific criteria to evaluate completeness of reporting, potential confounding, and bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were computed using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of the 19 studies included, 17 were cross-sectional, 1 was a prospective cohort, and 1 a case-control study. The meta-analyses of studies that controlled their estimates for at least age and gender showed the associations of pinch grip work with proximal interphalangeal joint [OR 1.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09-2.23] and the first carpometacarpal joint OA (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.06-4.17), but not with distal interphalangeal, metacarpalphalangeal, or wrist joints OA. Hand grip work and exposure to HAV were not associated with any finger or wrist OA. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological studies provide limited evidence that pinch grip may increase the risk of wrist or finger OA, but causal relation cannot be resolved because of cross-sectional designs and inadequate characterization of biomechanical strain to the hand and wrist.


Subject(s)
Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Vibration/adverse effects , Wrist Injuries/etiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Causality , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Pinch Strength , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Injuries/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...