Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 95
Filter
1.
Aktuelle Urol ; 52(2): 121-124, 2021 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822343

Subject(s)
Medical Oncology , Humans
2.
3.
Urologe A ; 59(5): 573-582, 2020 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In urology, the health implications of open pelvic surgery (OPS) on the patient have been the subject of numerous studies. However, health effects on the surgeon have not yet been sufficiently considered. The present study investigates the relationship between musculoskeletal disorders in urological surgeons and their activity in OPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the point of view of occupational physiology, exemplary operations in OPS were examined using the key indicator method (KIM). In addition, a web-based survey among German clinicians was carried out. From the collected variables, models for the prediction of the endpoints pain and disc herniation (DH) were generated by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Risk assessment of the operations with KIM could show that OPS presents a significantly increased physical workload and thus potential physical overstraining. Of the 605 participants in the survey, 35.4% were urologists performing OPS, 32.0% were urologists not performing OPS and 32.6% were gastroenterologists (control groups). Activity in OPS had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.09 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.66, p = 0.69) for predicting pain, and an OR of 1.14 for prediction of DH CI: 0.66-1.94; p = 0.64). Statistically significant factors influencing the perception of pain were BMI, gender and work ability index (WAI), whereas age and WAI were significant for the occurrence of DH. CONCLUSION: Our survey could not show that surgeons practicing OPS have a significantly increased rate of musculoskeletal disorders or, in particular, an increased rate of DH in comparison to the control groups. Nevertheless, the rate of reported complaints among all clinicians surveyed is high, and the random risk assessment of the examplary OPS operations could also demonstrate the risk of physical overstraining. Further considerations should therefore be made as to how reduce the strain on the musculoskeletal system.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Surgeons/psychology , Urologists/psychology , Workload , Adult , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
World J Urol ; 38(12): 3085-3090, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32103332

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) represents the upcoming standard for the staging of prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is still an unmet need for the validation of PSMA PET/CT at primary staging and consecutive histological correlation. Consequently, we decided to analyze the prediction parameter of PSMA PET/CT at primary staging. METHODS: We relied on 90 ≥ intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. All patients were administered to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to surgery. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT data were retrospectively reevaluated by a single radiologist and consequently compared to histological results from RP. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of lymph node metastases were analyzed per-patient (n = 90), per-pelvic side (n = 180), and per-anatomic-region (external iliac artery and vein left/right vs. obturator fossa left/right vs. internal iliac artery left/right) (n = 458), respectively. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-patient were: 43.8, 96.0, 70.0, and 88.8%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-pelvic-side were: 42.9, 95.6, 56.3, and 92.7%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-anatomic-region were: 47.6, 98.9, 66.7, and 97.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results were highly reliable in our study. Positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results, however, revealed less reliable results. Larger and ideally prospective trials are justified to clarify the potential role of PSMA PET/CT based primary staging.


Subject(s)
Edetic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Oligopeptides , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiopharmaceuticals , Aged , Correlation of Data , Gallium Isotopes , Gallium Radioisotopes , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
6.
Urologe A ; 58(9): 1066-1072, 2019 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041460

ABSTRACT

There is an ongoing change of paradigm in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Taxan-based chemotherapy demonstrated a prolonged survival of patients in several randomized phase III trials. This is true in the situation of metastatic castration-resistent prostate cancer (mCRPC) as well as in the hormone-naïve stage (metastatic castration-naive PC [mCNPC]). In patients with mCNPC, treatment with docetaxel in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prolonged the median total survival time by 15 months in comparison to ADT alone. Comparable results were obtained by the endocrine combination treatment with ADT/abiraterone. With the current data in mind it seems to be useful to discuss the value of early combination therapy with ADT/docetaxel or ADT/abiraterone as well as the impact on further treatment options in the mCRPC setting and to define criteria for treatment decisions in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
7.
Urologe A ; 58(10): 1185-1197, 2019 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone has long been the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mCSPC). A paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with mCSPC has now been initiated by the results of three major phase 3 clinical trials (CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE): They demonstrated a significant advantage of ADT in combination with docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone over ADT alone. OBJECTIVES: This review presents the current evidence for the use of docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone in combination with ADT and discusses-in the absence of directly comparing studies-which patients may have an advantage of ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone over ADT plus docetaxel or vice versa. METHODS: A systematic review based on bibliographic literature search was conducted. RESULTS: Both the combinations of ADT with docetaxel and with abiraterone/prednisone represent a major advance in the treatment of patients with mCSPC, in particular of patients with multiple metastases. Compared to chemotherapy, the use of abiraterone in addition to ADT avoids (rare) neutropenic complications and treatment-associated deaths. Long-term oral treatment with abiraterone/prednisone as a complementary therapy to ADT replaces short-term intravenous treatment (docetaxel). CONCLUSION: In patients with mCSPC, ADT plus docetaxel or ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone is recommended. In particular in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, ADT should be considered with a GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist to reduce the risk of cardiotoxic side effects.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
10.
Urologe A ; 57(7): 813-820, 2018 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808368

ABSTRACT

In March 2017 the 'Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference' (APCCC) took place in St. Gallen (Switzerland). The APCCC-panelists are internationally well known experts. With the actual data in mind they discussed treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer in order to update the international APCCC-recommendations from the previous meeting in 2015. Recently these consensus recommendations have been published in "European Urology".A group of German experts discussed this year APCCC-votes during the meeting and the recommendations that were concluded from the votes from the German perspective. Reasons for an additional German discussion are country-specific variations that may have influenced the APCCC-votes und recommendations. Due to the concept of the APCCC-meeting the wording of the questions could not always be as necessary.One focus of this year consensus discussion was the treatment of metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (mCNPC). There are new data which may also influence the therapeutic situation of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Further points of discussion were the impact of new imaging procedures in the clinical setting as well as the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Orchiectomy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Urology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome
11.
World J Urol ; 36(7): 1067-1072, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29497861

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obesity might negatively affect prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. However, evidence according to the associations between obesity and metastases-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) is still inconsistent. METHODS: We relied on PCa patients treated with RP at the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center between 2004 and 2015. First, multivariable Cox regression analyses examined the impact of obesity on metastases after RP. Last, in a propensity score matched cohort, Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed metastases-free survival according to body mass index (kg/m2) (BMI) strata (≥ 30 vs. < 25). RESULTS: Of 13,667 individuals, 1990 (14.6%) men were obese (BMI ≥ 30). Median follow-up was 36.4 month (IQR 13.3-60.8). Obese patients were less likely to exhibit metastases after RP (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.97, p = 0.03). Similarly, after propensity score adjustment, obesity was associated with increased metastases-free survival (log rank p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We recorded the obesity paradox phenomenon in PCa patients. In particular, high BMI (≥ 30) was associated with decreased risk of metastases after RP, despite an increased risk being anticipated. Whether statin use might have affected the results was not assessed. Further research is needed to unravel the controversially debated association between obesity and PCa.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Obesity , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Obesity/complications , Obesity/drug therapy , Propensity Score , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors
12.
Aktuelle Urol ; 48(4): e3-e4, 2017 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112998
15.
Urologe A ; 54(12): 1811-20; quiz 1821-2, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26704284

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade there has been a 25% decrease in the mortality rates for prostate cancer. The reasons for this significant decrease are most likely associated with the application of urological screening tests. The main tools for early detection are currently increased public awareness of the disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided topographically assignable biopsy sampling. Together with the histopathological results these features provide essential information for risk stratification, diagnostics and therapy decisions. The evolution of prostate biopsy techniques as well as the use of PSA testing has led to an increased identification of asymptomatic men, where further clarification is necessary. Significant efforts and increased clinical research focus on determining the appropriate indications for a prostate biopsy and the optimal technique to achieve better detection rates. The most widely used imaging modality for the prostate is TRUS; however, there are no clearly defined standards for the clinical approach for each individual biopsy procedure, dealing with continuous technical optimization and in particular the developments in imaging. In this review the current principles, techniques, new approaches and instrumentation of prostate biopsy imaging control are presented within the framework of the structured educational approach.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/standards , Image Enhancement/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Germany , Humans , Male , Patient Positioning/standards , Urology/standards
16.
Aktuelle Urol ; 44(4): 271-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23888406

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy is an integral part of the treatment of advanced and progressive prostate cancer. Various prospective randomised trials have investigated whether or not temporary suspension of androgen deprivation might delay the emergence of castration resistant prostate cancer and concomitantly improve quality of life. Until now, no phase III trial has been able to prove that intermittent androgen deprivation might delay the development of castration resistant tumours. Data from previous trials, except for one study, did at least not show adverse effects on survival. Data on quality of life are inconsistent, showing a trend towards improved quality of life with IAD. German as well as European guidelines reflect IAD as an established constituent of day-to-day medical practice. This review is intended to provide a code of practice for an individualised treatment as based on recently published studies.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Germany , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Analysis
18.
Urologe A ; 51(3): 403-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22350017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are special requirements for draining a pouch, e.g. length, flexibility and ability to drain highly viscous urine. METHODS: We checked in vitro the flow time of pure and synthetic urine thickened with hydroxyethylcellulose (0.125% and 0.250%, HEC) on selected catheters. RESULTS: We found for SpeediCath Compact Male (SCCM) as a CH12 catheter the shortest flow times for undiluted and urine thickened with 0.125% and for SafetyCath Plus for urine thickened with 0.250%. For catheters with CH14 we found significantly shorter flow times for all tested solutions. The flow time does not depend on amount and area of the catheter eyes; we found no difference in the flow time for 4-eye (MobiStom) and 2-eye catheters.


Subject(s)
Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urine/chemistry , Urine/physiology , Urodynamics/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cellulose/analogs & derivatives , Equipment Design , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Time Factors , Viscosity
19.
Urologe A ; 49(2): 181-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20180057

ABSTRACT

The current S3 guideline for early detection of prostate cancer initiates a change to the paradigm in early detection from the detection of all prostate cancers to the identification of aggressive prostate cancers. Early detection is performed annually and starts at the age of 40 years; it should be terminated at a life expectancy of less then 10 years. The choice of the frequency of early detection should be risk adapted. The digital rectal examination is supplemented by determination of PSA. Previous to the first PSA test the patient has to be informed concerning possible consequences such as biopsy recommendation and treatment options. A threshold of 4 ng/ml is defined as an indication for prostate biopsy for the first administration. In the following early detections the PSA velocity should be considered. Today imaging methods do not play a major role in early detection of prostate cancer. Early detection identifies many latent prostate cancers and patients may receive overtreatment. The recent S3 guideline for early detection is discussed against this background on the basis of the recent literature.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Digital Rectal Examination , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Biopsy , Early Diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy
20.
Urologe A ; 48(9): 1008, 1010, 1012-4, passim, 2009 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19680620

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in males. Because of the high cure rates, early detection of prostate cancer should identify organ-confined prostate cancers. An early detection examination should be performed annually starting at the age of 50 years and ending when life expectancy is less than 10 years. Digital rectal examination is supplemented by determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Before the first PSA test, the patient must be informed of possible consequences such as biopsy recommendation and treatment options. A threshold of 4 ng/ml is defined as the indication for prostate biopsy. Imaging methods do not play a major role in early detection of prostate cancer today. Early detection identifies many latent prostate cancers, and patients may receive overtreatment. A possible solution is to change the early detection paradigm from detection of all prostate cancers to identification of aggressive ones. In this article, early detection is discussed based on the recent literature.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...