Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 16(2): 73-6, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12823201

ABSTRACT

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) patients often experience non-cardiac chest pain. The aims of this study were to determine, in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: (i) whether esophageal dysmotility is more common in patients with MVP than in patients without MVP; and (ii) if acid sensitivity is an important cause of the chest pain in MVP patients. Esophageal manometry and acid perfusion testing were performed in 277 consecutive patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Patients with MVP (13 female, one male; mean age 49 years) were more likely (P = 0.01) to have esophageal dysmotility, while acid perfusion was less likely (P < 0.05) to provoke their chest pain, than in patients without MVP. The most common esophageal motor abnormalities detected in patients with and without MVP were diffuse esophageal spasm (prevalence, 57%) and non-specific motor disorder (prevalence, 9%), respectively. This study, the first large prospective series examining possible esophageal sensorimotor correlates of chest pain in MVP patients, demonstrates that in the absence of a cardiac cause for chest pain, a specific esophageal motility disorder should be excluded, rather than assuming the chest pain is likely to be due to acid sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/etiology , Esophageal Motility Disorders/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Mitral Valve Prolapse/complications , Esophageal Motility Disorders/epidemiology , Esophageal Motility Disorders/physiopathology , Female , Gastric Acid , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Prolapse/epidemiology , Mitral Valve Prolapse/physiopathology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies
2.
Endoscopy ; 33(7): 580-4, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11473328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In developed nations, increasing proportions of the population now reach advanced age. Physicians may be reluctant to refer such patients for non-critical diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, on the basis of perceived diminution of tolerance, safety and substantive benefits in these patients. We aimed to review the utility and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly cohort. METHODS: The study involved 214 consecutive participants aged 85 years or more, between 1995 and 1997. They were identified using a prospective database linked to the endoscopy reporting system. Procedure type, indication, use of sedation, complications, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age was 87 (85-94, sigma = 2). The female:male ratio was 3:2; 185 had undergone one procedure and 29 two or more; and 65% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. Of the inpatient procedures, 10% of all procedures were performed emergently, predominantly for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Midazolam was administered to 129 patients (60%), at a median dose of 2 mg (range 1-11); of these, 75 (35%) also received a median dose of 25 microg fentanyl (range 12.5-125). Colonoscopy (n = 95) was the most frequently performed procedure, followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (n = 64) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n = 21). There was no procedure-related mortality. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 5%, colonic perforation 1%, and cardiopulmonary complications in sedated patients, 0.6%. The majority underwent procedures which related to active management of ongoing medical problems, and procedures were performed for palliative indications in only 15 (7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy is extremely safe and well tolerated in extremely elderly patients. Age alone should not influence decisions relating to its utilization.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Colonoscopy , Endoscopy , Female , Gastroscopy , Humans , Male
3.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 9(3): 533-9, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10388866

ABSTRACT

This article evaluates the use of the Endocoil in patients with benign biliary obstruction. It contains detailed information regarding the practicalities of insertion and retrieval of the Endocoil stent and examines the evidence for its use in this group of patients. The author discusses complications and how to avoid them, and provides recommendations for the future use of the Endocoil.


Subject(s)
Cholestasis/surgery , Metals , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Stents , Bile Duct Diseases/complications , Bile Duct Diseases/surgery , Cholestasis/etiology , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...