Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(4): ofad146, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37065991

ABSTRACT

Background: The Department of Health and Human Services HIV-1 Treatment Guidelines recommend drug resistance testing in HIV-1 RNA to guide the selection of antiretroviral therapy in patients with viremia. However, resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in HIV-1 RNA may reflect only the patient's current regimen and can be lost during prolonged absence of therapy. We determined if HIV-1 DNA testing can provide drug resistance information beyond that identified in contemporaneous plasma virus. Methods: This was a retrospective database review of results obtained for patients with viremia for whom commercial HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA drug resistance testing was ordered on the same day. Resistance-associated mutations and drug susceptibility calls were compared between paired tests, and the effect of HIV-1 viral load (VL) on test concordance was assessed using Spearmen's rho correlation. Results: Among 124 paired tests, more RAMs were identified in HIV-1 DNA in 63 (50.8%) cases, and in HIV-1 RNA in 11 (8.87%) cases. HIV-1 DNA testing captured all contemporaneous plasma virus RAMs in 101/117 (86.3%) cases and identified additional RAMs in 63/117 (53.8%) cases. There was a significant positive correlation between the viral load at the time of resistance testing and the percentage of plasma virus RAMs detected in HIV-1 DNA (rs = 0.317; P < .001). In 67 test pairs demonstrating pan-sensitive plasma virus, resistance in HIV-1 DNA was seen in 13 (19.4%) cases. Conclusions: HIV-1 DNA testing identified more resistance than HIV-1 RNA testing in most patients with viremia and may be informative in patients whose plasma virus reverts to wild-type following therapy discontinuation.

2.
JAMA ; 311(17): 1760-9, 2014 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24794369

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Maternal immunization with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine could prevent infant pertussis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap immunization during pregnancy and its effect on infant responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1-2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted from 2008 to 2012. Forty-eight pregnant women aged 18 to 45 years received Tdap (n = 33) or placebo (n = 15) at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum. INTERVENTIONS: Tdap vaccination at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation or postpartum. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were maternal and infant adverse events, pertussis illness, and infant growth and development until age 13 months. Secondary outcomes were antibody concentrations in pregnant women before and 4 weeks after Tdap immunization or placebo, at delivery and 2 months' postpartum, and in infants at birth, at 2 months, and after the third and fourth doses of DTaP. RESULTS: No Tdap-associated serious adverse events occurred in women or infants. Injection site reactions after Tdap immunization were reported in 26 (78.8% [95% CI, 61.1%-91.0%]) and 12 (80% [95% CI, 51.9%-95.7%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P > .99). Systemic symptoms were reported in 12 (36.4% [ 95% CI, 20.4%-54.9%]) and 11 (73.3% [95% CI, 44.9%-92.2%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P = .03). Growth and development were similar in both infant groups. No cases of pertussis occurred. Significantly higher concentrations of pertussis antibodies were measured at delivery in women who received Tdap during pregnancy vs postpartum (eg, pertussis toxin antibodies: 51.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 37.1-70.1] and 9.1 EU/mL [95% CI, 4.6-17.8], respectively; P < .001) and in their infants at birth (68.8 EU/mL [95% CI, 52.1-90.8] and 14.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 7.3-26.9], respectively; P < .001) and at age 2 months (20.6 EU/mL [95% CI, 14.4-29.6] and 5.3 EU/mL [95% CI, 3.0-9.4], respectively; P < .001). Antibody responses in infants born to women receiving Tdap during pregnancy were not different following the fourth dose of DTaP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This preliminary assessment did not find an increased risk of adverse events among women who received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy or their infants. For secondary outcomes, maternal immunization with Tdap resulted in high concentrations of pertussis antibodies in infants during the first 2 months of life and did not substantially alter infant responses to DTaP. Further research is needed to provide definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of Tdap immunization during pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00707148.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Infant, Newborn/immunology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Antibody Formation , Child Development , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Immunization , Infant , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Whooping Cough/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...