Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 28(11): 1304-1315, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Warfarin, the standard of care prior to DOACs, requires monitoring and dose adjustment to ensure patients remain appropriately anticoagulated. DOACs do not require monitoring but are significantly more expensive. We sought to examine real-world effectiveness and costs of DOACs and warfarin in patients with AF and VTE. OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical and economic outcomes. The clinical objectives were to determine the bleeding and thrombotic event rates associated with DOACs vs warfarin. The economic objectives were to determine the cost associated with these events, as well as the all-cause medical and pharmacy costs associated with DOACs vs warfarin. METHODS: This analysis was an observational, propensity-matched comparison of retrospective medical and pharmacy claims data for members enrolled in an integrated health plan between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2020. Members who were older than 18 years of age with at least 1 30-day supply of warfarin or a DOAC filled within 30 days of a new diagnosis of VTE or nonvalvular AF were eligible for the analysis. Cox hazard ratios were used to compare differences in clinical outcomes, where paired t-tests were used to evaluate economic outcomes. RESULTS: After matching, there were 893 patients in each group. Among matched members, warfarin was associated with increased risk of nonmajor bleeds relative to apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.526; P = 0.0048) and increased risk of pulmonary embolism relative to both DOACs (apixaban: HR = 1.941 [P = 0.0328]; rivaroxaban: HR = 1.833 [P = 0.0489]). No statistically significant difference was observed in hospitalizations or in length of stay between warfarin and either DOAC. The difference-in-difference (DID) in total costs of care per member per month for apixaban and rivaroxaban relative to warfarin were $801.64 (P = 0.0178) and $534.23 (P = 0.0998) more, respectively. DID in VTE-related cost for apixaban was $177.09 less, relative to warfarin (P = 0.0098). DID in all-cause pharmacy costs for apixaban and rivaroxaban relative to warfarin were $342.47 (P < 0.0001) and $386.42 (P < 0.001) more, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin use was associated with a significant decrease in total cost of care despite a significant increase in VTE-related costs vs apixaban. Warfarin was also associated with a significant increase in other nonmajor bleeds relative to apixaban, as well as a significant increase in pulmonary embolism relative to both DOACs. Warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause pharmacy cost compared with either DOAC. DISCLOSURES: The authors of this study have nothing to disclose.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Pulmonary Embolism , Stroke , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Infant , Warfarin/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Insurance Claim Review , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Pyridones/adverse effects , Hemorrhage , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/chemically induced , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Administration, Oral
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(2): 147-156, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33506728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although medication therapy management (MTM) has specific eligibility criteria and is mandated for specific Medicare Part D enrollees, some health plans have expanded MTM eligibility beyond the minimum criteria to include other Medicare Part D enrollees, Medicaid, and commercial health plan patients. Differences exist in the mode of delivery, location of services, type of personnel involved in managing the service, and the subsequent outcomes. The type and intensity of MTM services delivered have evolved with time to more streamlined and robust interventions, necessitating ongoing evaluation of the effect on clinical and economic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of changes to an existing MTM program on cost of care, utilization, and medication adherence. METHODS: UPMC Health Plan made changes to an existing MTM program by expanding eligibility (customized by the type of health plan), intervention types, pharmacist involvement, and patient followup contacts. After matching our intervention cohort (identified January 2017-June 2018) with the pre-2016 MTM historical controls (patients identified January 2014-June 2015 who would have been eligible if we used the intervention cohort eligibility criteria), we estimated that the effect of the program changes with a difference-in-difference model (preintervention [2014-2016] and postintervention [2017-2019]). Outcomes of interest included cost (total cost of care including medical, pharmacy, and unplanned care [i.e., unscheduled health care use such as emergency department visits] in 2017 U.S. dollars); utilization; medication adherence (proportion of days covered); and return on investment (ROI). Target population included continuously enrolled patients aged ≥ 21 years in the commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid health plans. RESULTS: Total propensity score-matched members was 10,747, 55% of which were in the historic control group. The average (SD) ages after matching the groups were similar (historical control group: 57.08 years [14.23], intervention group: 56.79 years [14.21]) and the majority was female (57%). Comorbidities identified most for patients included hypertension (77%), dyslipidemia (70%), and diabetes (52%). Forty-one percent were in the commercial, 37% in the Medicaid, and 23% in the Medicare health plans. Proportion of care activities undertaken in the intervention period compared with the control period were significantly different: "sent letter to physician" (67% vs. 87%), "sent letter to member" (15% vs. 0%), "pharmacist phone call to physician" (15% vs. 0.1%), and "pharmacist phone call to member" (13% vs. 7%). There were statistically significant reductions in unplanned care across all health plans especially in the Medicare population, in total cost of care, and increases in medication adherence in 4 therapeutic classes: anticoagulants (OR = 1.25, P = 0.005), cardiac medications (OR = 1.20, P < 0.001), statins (OR = 1.21, P < 0.001), and antidepressants (OR = 1.15, P < 0.001). There was a positive ROI of $18.50 per dollar spent, which equated to a cumulative net savings of $11 million over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: In a large health plan, expanding MTM eligibility, intensifying patient follow-up contact and pharmacist involvement, and improving provider awareness had favorable clinical and economic benefits. DISCLOSURES: There was no funding for this project except employees' time. All authors are employees of UPMC and have no conflicts of interest to report.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Regional Health Planning/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Conditioning, Operant , Cost Savings , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/organization & administration , Medicare Part D/economics , Medicare Part D/organization & administration , Medication Therapy Management/economics , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Regional Health Planning/economics , United States
3.
Am J Health Promot ; 34(4): 366-375, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048859

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate impact of physician referral to health coaching on patient engagement and health risk reduction. DESIGN: Four-year retrospective, observational cohort study with propensity-matched pair comparisons. SETTING: Integrated delivery and finance system in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. SAMPLE: 10 457 adult insured members referred to health coaching by their physician; 37 864 other members identified for health coaching through insurer-initiated outreach. INTERVENTION: Practice-based, technology-supported workflow and process for physician prescribing of health coaching during regular office visit, with follow-up on patient's progress and implementation supports. MEASURES: Patient engagement based on completion of pre-enrollment assessment, formal enrollment in health coaching, completion of required sessions, health risk levels, and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching referral. ANALYSIS: Difference-in-difference analysis to assess change in health risk levels and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching and probability weighting to control for potential confounding between groups. RESULTS: Members referred by a physician were significantly more likely to enroll in a health coaching program (21.0% vs 6.0%, P < .001) and complete the program requirements (8.5% vs 2.7%, P < .001) than when referred by insurer-initiated outreach; significant within group improvement in health risk levels from baseline (P < .001) was observed for both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are significantly more likely to engage in health coaching when a referral is made by a physician; engagement in health coaching significantly improves health risk levels.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/organization & administration , Mentoring/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Workplace , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Behavior , Health Status , Healthy Lifestyle , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
4.
Echo Res Pract ; 4(4): 63-72, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has traditionally been supported intraprocedurally by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is increasingly being used. We evaluated echocardiographic imaging characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent TTE during TAVI (TTE-TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A select team of dedicated sonographers and interventional echocardiographers performed TTE-TAVI in 278 patients, all of whom underwent TAVI through transfemoral access. We implanted the Medtronic EVOLUT R valve in 258 patients (92.8%). TTE images were acquired immediately pre-procedure by a dedicated sonographer in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with the patient in the supine position. TTE was then performed post deployment of TAVI. In the procedure, TTE image quality was fair or better in 249 (89.6%) cases. Color-flow Doppler was adequate or better in 275 (98.9%) cases. In 2 cases, paravalvular regurgitation (PVL) could not be assessed confidently by echocardiography due to poor image quality; in those cases, PVL was assessed by fluoroscopy, aortic root injection and invasive hemodynamics. Both TTE and invasive hemodynamics were used in the assessment of need for post-deployment stent ballooning (n = 23, 8.3%). TTE adequately recognized new pericardial effusion in 3 cases. No case required TOE conversion for image quality. There was only 1 case of intraprocedural TTE failing to recognize moderate PVL, without clinical implication. In 99% of patients, TTE-TAVI adequately assessed PVL compared with 24-h and 1-month follow-up TTE. CONCLUSIONS: With the current generation of TAVI, TTE-TAVI is adequate intraprocedurally when performed by specialized sonographers and dedicated cardiologists in a highly experienced TAVI center.

5.
AORN J ; 104(6): 554-565, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27890062

ABSTRACT

Pressure injuries negatively affect patients physically, emotionally, and economically. Studies report that pressure injuries occur in 69% of inpatients who have undergone a surgical procedure while hospitalized. In 2012, we created a nurse-initiated, perioperative pressure injury risk assessment measure for our midwestern, urban, adult teaching hospital. We retrospectively applied the risk assessment to a random sample of 350 surgical patients which validated the measure. The prospective use of the risk assessment and prevention measures in 350 surgical patients resulted in a 60% reduction in pressure injuries compared with the retrospective group. Our findings support the use of a multipronged approach for the prevention of health care-associated pressure injuries in the surgical population, which includes assessment of risk, implementation of evidence-based prevention interventions for at-risk patients, and continuation of prevention beyond the perioperative setting to the nursing care unit.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Nurses' , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Aged , Evidence-Based Nursing , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/nursing , Pressure Ulcer/nursing , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
Heart Lung ; 45(3): 273-82, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26916454

ABSTRACT

Decreases in circulating hsCRP have been associated with increased physical activity and exercise training, although the ability of exercise interventions to reduce hsCRP and which individuals benefit the most remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the ability of exercise to reduce hsCRP levels in healthy individuals and in individuals with heart disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted that included exercise interventions trials from 1995 to 2012. Forty-three studies were included in the final analysis for a total of 3575 participants. Exercise interventions significantly reduced hsCRP (standardized mean difference -0.53 mg/L; 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.33). Results of sub-analysis revealed no significant difference in reductions in hsCRP between healthy adults and those with heart disease (p = .20). Heterogeneity between studies could not be attributed to age, gender, intervention length, intervention type, or inclusion of diet modification. Exercise interventions reduced hsCRP levels in adults irrespective of the presence of heart disease.​.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise/physiology , Heart Diseases/therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Heart Diseases/blood , Humans
7.
J Am Coll Health ; 63(3): 204-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25338175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine if medication reminding via smartphone app increases adherence to antidepressant medications in college students. PARTICIPANTS: College students (N = 57) enrolled at a state-funded institution who had a current prescription for an antidepressant and regularly used a smartphone device. METHODS: Participants were randomized to either a reminder group or a control group. Both groups were asked to complete a survey and undergo a manual pill count at the beginning of the study and 30 days later. RESULTS: There was a strong trend suggesting that the use of a medication reminder app was beneficial for adherence to antidepressant medication regimens. Factors influencing medication adherence in college students included health beliefs, use of illicit drugs, and type of professional care received. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a medication reminder may increase adherence to antidepressant medications in college students.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence , Reminder Systems/statistics & numerical data , Students , Adolescent , Depression/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Student Health Services/methods , Young Adult
8.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 14(6): 509-13, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25108681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Age, cytogenetic status, and molecular features are the most important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to insurance status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed, covering all patients with AML and high-risk MDS evaluated and treated at Akron General Medical Center between 2002 and 2012. A Cox regression model was analyzed to account for survival over time, adjusted for insurance type, while controlling for patient age at diagnosis and patient risk of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 130 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) were identified. Insurance information was available for 97 patients enrolled in the study; 3 were excluded because of self-pay status. Cox regression analysis with insurance type as the predictor found that overall survival declines over time and that the rate of decline may be influenced by insurance type (χ(2)(2) = 6.4; P = .044). The likelihood of survival in patients with Medicaid or Medicare without supplemental insurance was .552 (95% CI, .338-.903; P = .018) times the likelihood in patients who had Medicare with supplemental insurance. To explain the difference, variables of age, gender, and risk of mortality were added to the model. Age and risk of mortality were found to be significant predictors of survival. The addition of insurance type to the model did not significantly contribute (χ(2)(3) = 3.83; P = .147). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in overall survival was observed when patients with AML or high-risk MDS were analyzed according to their health insurance status. The overall survival was low in this study compared with the national average. Early referral to a specialized center or possible clinical trial enrollment may be a good alternative to improve outcome.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/epidemiology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Patient Outcome Assessment , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
9.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 75 Suppl 2: S44-7, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18540146

ABSTRACT

The belief that postoperative atrial fibrillation (PAF) results from transient autonomic dysfunction suggests that interventions such as clinical hypnosis may reduce the incidence of PAF. To explore this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared outcomes between two groups of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 50 consecutive patients who received preoperative hypnoidal explanation of the surgical procedure and 50 case-matched historical controls who received no clinical hypnosis. The patients who received hypnosis were significantly less likely to experience an episode of PAF (P = .003) and showed nonsignificant trends toward superior outcomes in terms of length of stay, narcotic use, and total hospital charges. Our findings indicate that prospective randomized trials are warranted to further delineate the potential benefit of clinical hypnosis for prevention of PAF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & control , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Hypnosis , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...