Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(1): 168-172, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36190699

ABSTRACT

The incidence of traumatic tympanic membrane rupture (TTMR) has increased over recent decades. The association of certain external injury causes and bone fracture patterns with TTMR is anecdotal. It has been suggested that a diagnosis of TTMR may be missed during the acute trauma admission. The authors sought to evaluate the incidence of TTMR according to external injury cause and evaluate the association of skull fracture patterns with TTMR using a national trauma database. A cross-sectional analysis of trauma encounters was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2008 to 2015. Demographic and injury data were abstracted. Poisson regression was used to determine the incidence rate ratios of tympanic membrane rupture by external injury cause and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) of TTMR by skull fracture type. A total of 8214 patients were identified with TTMR during acute admission. The majority were on average 30 years old, 76% male, 71% White, had a mean Injury Severity Score of 14, and 42% were admitted to level I centers. The incidence rate ratio was only higher in lightning related injuries [5.262; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.194-6.602] when using those caused by explosives as a reference. Basilar skull (OR: 12.95; 95% CI: 12.095-12.866) and cranial vault (OR: 2.938; 95% CI: 2.647-3.260) fractures were most associated with TTMR. The high incidence TTMR in association with certain external causes of injury and types of skull fractures should drive screening in the acute setting in order to increase detection and reduce morbidity from missed injuries.


Subject(s)
Skull Fractures , Tympanic Membrane Perforation , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Incidence , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/epidemiology , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalization , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers
2.
Ophthalmic Genet ; 43(6): 742-755, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) is an objective method of classifying patients based on skin color and sunburn sensitivity. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a method of determining the prognosis of patients with uveal melanoma based on genetic composition of the tumor. There is no literature studying the relationship of FST and TCGA groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study on 854 patients with uveal melanoma treated at a single tertiary ocular oncology center between April 2006 and June 2020, classified based on FST on a scale of I-VI and based on genetic analysis with TCGA classification on a scale of A, B, C, and D. Outcome measures included uveal melanoma-related metastasis and death per FST and TCGA group. RESULTS: Patients classified as FST I (compared to FST II and III-V) had higher odds of being TCGA group D (OR 2.34, p = 0.002). Patients classified as FST III-V (compared to FST I and II) had higher odds of being TCGA group B (OR 2.26, p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in melanoma-related metastasis or death comparing FST I vs. II vs. III-V within each TCGA group at 5, 10, and 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients classified as FST I are more likely to have a higher grade melanoma on genetic testing whereas those classified as FST III-V show lower grade melanoma. Despite differences in tumor features and genetic profile with various FST, survival analysis at 5, 10, and 15 years revealed no difference in melanoma-related metastasis or death within each TCGA group per skin tone.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Uveal Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...