Effectiveness of Bach Nien Kien Health Supplement in the Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common disease in adults. We conducted a clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bach Nien Kien (BNK) in supportive therapy for patients with symptomatic KOA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open interventional study was performed on 60 patients aged 38 to 70 with the diagnosis of symptomatic KOA. The patients were assigned to a study group (SG) with 30 subjects and a control group (CG) with 30 subjects using a matching method. The patients in SG were treated with electroacupuncture, glucosamine supplement, and BNK, while the patients in CG received the same treatment without BNK. RESULTS: At the end of the 30-day treatment (d30), the SG had a reduction in VAS score compared to a pre-treatment level of 3.03±0.96 points, which was more than the CG of 2.5±0.90 points. The excellent result in the SG was 10%, and the CG had no excellent result. The good result in the SG was 56.7%, and the CG group was only 26.7%. The moderate and poor results in the CG were high, 63.3%, and 10%, respectively; in the SG, only 26.7% and 6.7%. The difference in overall treatment results between the SG and CG was statistically significant (p<0.05). During the 30-day treatment period in both groups, no patient reported any undesirable effects. CONCLUSION: Bach Nien Kien health supplement is effective and safe for controlling KOA symptoms and improving joint motion and quality of life for patients with symptomatic KOA.

A Prospective Study of AFree Oral Spray as an Adjuvant Therapy for Mild and Moderate COVID-19 in Community Health Stations: Clinical Progression and Viral Clearance Outcomes.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AFree oral spray, in combination with Standard of Care, in treating mild to moderate COVID-19 patients. This was an open-label, single-blinded, and controlled randomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 1,252 patients, who were randomly assigned to either the control or study group, with 626 patients in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with Standard of Care recommended by the Ministry of Health of Vietnam, while patients in the study group received AFree oral spray in addition to Standard of Care for a period of 10 days. The clinical progression and outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: The results showed that the proportion of patients with clinical symptoms on the 5th, 7th and 10th days were significantly lower in the study group (45.05%, 3.19% and 0%, respectively) compared to the control group (86.10%, 67.73% and 22.84%, respectively). Additionally, the rate of Real-time PCR test positivity for COVID-19 was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group on the 4th, 7th, and 10th days (82.75% vs. 98.72%, 9.27% vs. 92.97%, and 1.12% vs. 50.48%, respectively). Furthermore, no side effects or complications related to AFree oral spray were recorded in the study group. CONCLUSION: The use of AFree oral spray resulted in significant improvements in clinical symptoms, recovery time, and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate symptoms. This therapy has been shown to be safe and can be used as an adjuvant treatment for COVID-19 as well as other respiratory viral infections.

Therapeutic Efficacy of AFree Oral Spray on the Symptoms and Course of Moderate and Severe COVID-19 in the Field Hospital.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A prospective randomized, open-label, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of AFree on the symptoms and course of moderate and severe COVID-19 in the field hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were enrolled. The patients were randomized into 100 patients in the interventional AFree group and 100 in the control group. The AFree group patients were treated with AFree oral spray in conjunction with the standard COVID-19 treatment protocol, while the control group of patients were treated with only standard care. RESULTS: Patients of the AFree group demonstrated a remarkedly faster improvement in all COVID-19-related symptoms, resulting in a shorter time for complete recovery than the control group. More importantly, they showed a shorter time for complete viral clearance. Adding AFree to the standard of care protocol also significantly improved the restoration of taste and smell and reduced lung infiltration. Additionally, the patients in the AFree group also exhibited fewer adverse effects related to treatment. CONCLUSION: AFree oral spray is a simple-to-use, safe, and effective adjunctive treatment for moderate and severe COVID-19 cases. AFree oral spray was demonstrated to potentially be effective for COVID-19 prevention.

Targeting Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction With L-Carnitine for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major medical problem and the world's third leading cause of death. COPD is a chronic disease with heterogeneous clinical symptoms, disease progression, and treatment responses. Besides pulmonary symptomatology, the common systemic clinical manifestations are cachexia, muscle weakness, and widespread comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, and infections. The adverse effects of pharmaceutical therapies contribute to the difficulty of health risk assessment and management of COPD patients. This review shows how skeletal muscle dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities contribute significantly to COPD patients' symptoms, functional activities, quality of life, and overall disease outcomes. Based on the clinical evidence of L-carnitine and derivatives as metabolic and muscle bioenergetic enhancers, we propose broader research and implementation of this nutraceutical agent as an effective, inexpensive, and safe adjuvant therapeutic for the long-term management of COPD patients. Moreover, we believe the management of COPD as a chronic disease should be shifted from symptomatic reactive pharmaceutical intervention to more constructive and non-toxic approaches using a single or combination of natural and nutritional agents with potential muscle metabolic enhancing and immunomodulating activities to achieve a better overall outcome for the patients in terms of morbidity, mortality, and medical cost-reduction.

Successful Phytotherapy for Acute Refractory Radiation Cystitis in a Cervical Cancer Patient: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiation cystitis is a frequent complication that can occur after therapeutic irradiation of pelvic cancers. The current treatment for this condition is complex and often ineffective. CASE REPORT: We present a clinical case of a 54-year-old patient diagnosed with small cell cervical cancer FIGO stage IIIC who developed grade 2-3 radiation cystitis following post-operational chemoradiation therapy. The patient exhibited increased urinary urgency and frequency, dysuria, and low abdominal pain, which failed to respond to acupuncture and corticosteroid treatments. A course of Ich Nieu Khang phytotherapy tablets, resulted in significant improvement of symptoms within 24 hours of initiation. The symptoms resolved completely within 10 days, and ultrasonography documented a marked decrease in bladder wall thickening and improved bladder evacuation function. The phytotherapy was well-tolerated, and no side-effects were observed during the 60-day treatment period. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that phytotherapy may be viable for managing radiation cystitis. However, further controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of Ich Nieu Khang and promote its broader clinical applications.

Nowarta110 Topical Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Plantar Warts: A Phase I/II Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Plantar warts are cutaneous lesions on the plantar aspect of the foot caused by the infection of keratinocytes with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The severity and magnitude of warts can vary, but they cause pain and discomfort for all age groups. The treatment for plantar warts remains a continuing challenge. The purpose of this research was to compare the efficacy and safety of naturally derived Nowarta110 topical formula versus a matching placebo in treating plantar warts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a randomized, double-blind, parallel assignment control interventional phase I/II clinical trial. This study included 54 patients with plantar warts. Patients were randomized to two groups: the placebo group, which included 26 patients treated with a matching placebo and the Nowarta110 group, which included 28 patients who received topical Nowarta110. The diagnosis of plantar warts was made by clinical examination. The treatment's efficacy and safety were assessed every week and after 6 weeks from the initiation of the intervention. RESULTS: In the Nowata110 group, 18 patients (64.3%) were completely cleared of their warts, and 10 patients (35.7%) partially responded to the therapy with a 20% to 80% decrease in warts dimensions. In the placebo group, only 2 patients (7.7%) were completely cleared of their warts, and 3 patients (11.5%) partially responded to the intervention with a 10% to 35% decrease in warts dimensions. The difference was highly significant between the two groups. There was 1 event with minor pain as a side effect in the Nowarta110 group and 9 events of non-serious local side effects in the placebo group, which included 2 patients who dropped out. CONCLUSION: Topical Nowarta110 is a safe, well-tolerated, and highly effective therapeutic modality in treating refractory and recurrent plantar warts. The breakthrough findings of the study encourage further extensive clinical trials to fully explore the prospect of Nowarta110 in managing all types of warts and HPV-related diseases.

The Rationality of Implementation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide as Differentiation-inducing Agent in Cancer Therapy.

One of the major hallmarks of many cancer cells is dedifferentiated cells (immature cells) with little or no resemblance to normal cells. Besides the poor differentiation, malignant cells also have important features such as aggressiveness and resistance to different therapeutics. Differentiation potentiators hold great promise for cancer treatment. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a well-characterized pharmaceutical solvent. It is used as a component of numerous cancer therapeutic approaches, including cancer treatment and several approved cancer immune therapeutics such as Car-T cell therapy and the FDA-approved drug Mekinist (trametinib DMSO) for melanoma treatment. It is also biologically recognized as a pharmaceutical solvent and cryoprotectant. In the current literature, there are no mentions of DMSO's possible ability to potentiate therapeutic activity as a component of these cancer treatments. This review aimed to summarize scientific evidence and substantiate the concept that DMSO can contribute positively to the overall efficacy of cancer treatment as an adjuvant that is safe, inexpensive, and an effective differentiation-inducing therapeutic agent.