Analysis of the benefit of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in premenopausal women undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) appears to exhibit ovarian protection during chemotherapy for malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of GnRHa in premenopausal women undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT). Candidates for myeloablative chemotherapy HSCT requiring fertility preservation in the Gynecological Endocrinology Clinic of Peking University People's Hospital from December 2011 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who chose to receive GnRHa treatment were given at least 2 courses of a 3.75-mg dose of a GnRHa before myeloablative chemotherapy, and patients who chose not to receive GnRHa treatment were included in the control group. All patients were monitored for menstruation return and menopause-related symptoms, and ovarian function tests [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, and estradiol] were performed 6-12 months after HSCT. In addition, we assessed the vaginal bleeding of patients in the laminar air-flow room (LAFR). A total of 234 cases were included in this study: 77 cases in the treatment group and 157 cases in the control group. The incidence of vaginal bleeding in the LAFR in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (24.68% vs. 79.62%, P < 0.001). The menopausal symptoms of the patients in the treatment group were reduced after transplantation (46.75% vs. 19.75%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in visible follicles by follow-up ultrasound in the two groups after HSCT (16.88% vs. 13.38%, P = 0.474). The level of FSH at 6-12 months after transplantation was lower (98.00 mIU/ml vs. 117.53 mIU/ml, P = 0.001). The proportion of patients with FSH < 40 mIU/ml did not differ between the two groups. One patient in the treatment group recovered spontaneous menstruation, while none recovered spontaneous menstruation in the control group (1.30% vs. 0%, P = 0.329). The use of GnRHa may relieve menopause-related symptoms and reduce vaginal bleeding in the LAFR and breakthrough bleeding after transplantation. GnRHa treatment can reduce the level of FSH after myeloablative chemotherapy, but it cannot reduce the incidence of premature ovarian failure in women of reproductive age following myeloablative HSCT.

The association between body mass index and efficacy of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggested a potential correlation between BMI and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the body mass index (BMI) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) patients treat with pembrolizumab. METHODS: The current retrospective cohort study enrolled 49 R/M HNSCC patients underwent at least one cycle of pembrolizumab as second-line treatment from June 2018 to October 2020. Survival analysis of immunotherapy prognosis and risk factor analysis of age, gender, BMI, ECOG-PS, CPS, rT-stage, tumor site, and tube feeding. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients, the BMI at the time of immunotherapy ranged from 14.5 to 32.0 kg/m2 . The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the BMI was significantly correlated with overall survival time (OS, p = 0.0007) and progression-free survival time (PFS, p = 0.0012). BMI, gender, prior treatment, serum albumin level, ECOG-PS, CPS and rT-stage were analyzed in multivariate Cox regression model analysis after adjusted for potential confounding clinical variables. Patients with underweight (OS:HR = 6.862, 95% CI:1.566-30.064, p = 0.011; PFS:HR = 5.672, 95% CI:1.364-23.586, p = 0.017);ECOG≥2 (OS:HR = 0.250, 95% CI:0.086-0.731, p = 0.011;PFS:HR = 0.284, 95% CI:0.101-0.805, p = 0.018); CPS <1(OS: HR = 4.34, 95% CI:1.271-15.464, p = 0.019; PFS:HR = 3.859, 95% CI:1.180-12.618, p = 0.025) and rT4-stage(OS:HR = 4.380, 95% CI:1.452-13.209, p = 0.009;PFS: HR = 3.799, 95% CI:1.240-11.638, p = 0.019) suffered higher risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The BMI at the time of clinical diagnosis was showed to be an independent predictive factor for R/M HNSCC patients receiving pembrolizumab. Compared with normal weight patients, underweight patients have worse clinical prognosis.

Developing a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials of Chinese Medicine for Hyperlipidemia.

Background: Chinese medicine (CM) is widely used for treating hyperlipidemias, especially in China. However, the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and reported across trials exacerbates the obstacles of evidence synthesis and effectiveness comparison. In this study, we develop a core outcome set (COS) for CM clinical trials for hyperlipidemia (COS-CM-Hyperlipidemia) to tackle the outcome issues. Methods: We generated candidate outcomes through a systematic review of interventional and observational studies of Chinese medicine for hyperlipidemias. The comprehensive search strategy was employed. Study selection and data collection were independently done by two researchers. We searched clinical trial registry platform to supplement the outcomes list extracted by systematic review. Then, we conducted a three-round Delphi survey. The stakeholders were hyperlipidemia patients, clinicians or researchers, in either CM/integrated Chinese or Western medicine, clinical pharmacy, clinical epidemiology or statisticians, or editors of important relevant journals and an ethicist. They used a 9-point Likert scale to determine how important they felt each outcome was in determining treatment success. A consensus meeting was held to confirm the final COS, based on the Delphi survey results. Results: We identified a total of 433 outcomes from 3,547 articles, and 28 outcomes from 367 registered trials. After standardization, we selected 71 outcomes to develop a preliminary outcome list for further consensus. After three Delphi survey rounds and one consensus meeting, the most important outcomes were determined for COS-CM-Hyperlipidemia. It included cardiovascular events, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, risk of cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol, carotid intima-media thickness, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, cerebrovascular events, adverse drug reactions and patient-reported symptoms. Conclusion: COS-CM-Hyperlipidemia may improve outcome reporting consistency in clinical trials. Further work is needed to explore the optimal methods for measuring these outcomes. Registration: The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (COMET): http://www.cometinitiative.org/studies/details/983. Registered on 25 April 2017.

Outcome Reporting Variability in Trials of Chinese Medicine for Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review for Developing a Core Outcome Set.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperlipidemia is an underlying process behind cardiovascular disease. Chinese medicine (CM) may be effective in treating hyperlipidemia, but there is a lack of studies with high methodological quality. A major reason for this is heterogeneity in outcome reporting. Therefore, this study explores the degree of outcome reporting variation in CM trials for hyperlipidemia. It then generates a list of potentially important outcomes for developing a core outcome set (COS). METHODS: A systematic review of literature focusing on studies of CM for hyperlipidemia was conducted. Outcomes were listed verbatim and grouped into 8 domains. Outcome frequency and definition uniformity were analyzed. RESULTS: 3,702 studies and 452 individual outcomes were identified. These outcomes were reported 27,328 times, of which 1.6% were reported as primary outcomes, and 13.3% were defined. The most frequent outcome was total triglyceride, represented in 86.7% of the studies, followed by total cholesterol (86.0%), total effective rate (75.1%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (73.2%), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (60.5%). However, 43.6% of outcomes were reported only once. The largest outcome domain was "pathological or pathophysiological outcomes," which included 67.0% of outcomes. Of the "response rate related outcomes" domain, total effective rate was the most frequently reported outcome (n = 2,780), and 95.3% of the studies gave a clear definition. However, these definitions were often contradictory. Only 10 papers reported cardiovascular events, 3 of which referred to them as primary outcomes. Moreover, ten patient-reported outcomes were reported in the retrieved literature 19 times in total. The majority of the outcomes did not report measurement instruments (MIs) (269/453, 59.4%). MIs of the surrogate outcomes were reported more frequently. CONCLUSION: Outcome reporting in CM trials for hyperlipidemia is inconsistent and ill-defined, creating barriers to data synthesis and comparison. Thus, we propose and are developing a COS for CM trials for hyperlipidemia.