Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative assessment of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is invaluable when considering nipple-sparing mastectomy. Our hypothesis is that breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may predict involvement of the NAC with tumor. METHODS: Clinical, histopathologic, and imaging data were compiled for patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI followed by mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for malignancy between 2006 and 2009. Blinded rereview of all MRI studies was performed by a breast MRI imager and compared to initial MRI findings. Multivariate analysis identified variables predicting NAC involvement with tumor. RESULTS: Of 77 breasts, 18 (23 %) had tumor involving or within 1 cm of the NAC. The sensitivity of detecting histopathologically confirmed NAC involvement was 61 % with history and/or physical examination, and 56 % with MRI. Univariate analysis identified the following variables as significant for NAC involvement: large tumors near the nipple on preoperative MRI, node-positive disease, invasive lobular carcinoma, advanced histopathologic T stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, only tumor size >2 cm and distance from tumor edge to the NAC <2 cm on MRI maintained significance. Pearson correlation coefficient for MRI size compared to histopathologic size was 0.53 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MRI is not superior to thorough clinical evaluation for predicting tumor in or near the NAC. However, MRI-measured tumor size and distance from the NAC are correlated with increased risk of NAC involvement. The combination of preoperative history and physical examination, tumor characteristics, and breast MRI can aid the surgeon in predicting a tumor-involved nipple more than any single modality alone.

Laparoscopic transgastric removal of eroded adjustable band: a novel approach.

Gastric erosion is a well-known complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) placement for morbid obesity. We describe a novel approach for the removal of an eroded band through a laparoscopic gastrotomy with subsequent intraluminal division and removal of the band. A 67-year-old woman with a body mass index of 35.5 kg/m2 was seen 1 year after LAGB placement performed outside the United States. She had developed dysphagia and regurgitation of undigested food a few months after the procedure. The LAGB had been adjusted twice by her primary surgeons and was completely deflated once her symptoms began. The patient failed to improve and was subsequently referred to our institution where an upper endoscopy revealed intragastric band erosion. The patient was taken to the operating room for LAGB removal; however, standard laparoscopic and endoscopic attempts at band retrieval were unsuccessful. We then attempted a novel laparoscopic technique. An anterior gastrotomy was created, distal to the area of erosion, to facilitate easy intraluminal band division and removal. The gastrotomy was repaired, and a leak test was performed. A postoperative Gastrografin upper gastrointestinal series showed no extravasation. The patient began a diet, was discharged, and was seen in follow-up with complete resolution of her symptoms. The results of this case have shown that laparoscopic transgastric removal of an eroded gastric band is safe and feasible when standard endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques fail.