Femoral neck fracture patients with ischaemic stroke choose hemiarthroplasty or constrained liner total hip arthroplasty? A retrospective comparative study of 199 cases.

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the long-term survival rate, complications, as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty using constrained polyethylene liners in patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that included patients with ischemic stroke who underwent hip arthroplasty from March 2010 to September 2017. In the Constrained Acetabular Liners (CAL) group, patients received an uncemented acetabular shell with a constrained polyethylene liner. The Dual Mobility (DM) group underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA). Additionally, hip function, range of motion, quality of life, the incidence of clinical complications, and prosthesis stability were investigated. Results: 96 patients with unilateral femoral neck fractures who underwent hip replacement with CAL were included in the CAL group, while 103 patients who underwent hip replacement with a dual mobility head were included in the DM group. VAS, and SF-36 data were available for both CAL and DM groups. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the HHS in the CAL group was significantly lower than that in the DM group (80.83 ± 3.91 vs. 83.17 ± 4.15, P < 0.05). The VAS score in the CAL group peaked at the 1-year follow-up (2.07 ± 0.91 vs. 1.49 ± 0.85, P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of HSS, VAS, and SF-36 at the last follow-up after surgery. Operative time and the amount of bleeding in the DM group were significantly lower than those in the CAL group (105.30 ± 29.68 vs. 94.85 ± 31.07; 355.11 ± 123.95 vs. 302.22 ± 107.68, P < 0.05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the mean leg length discrepancy between the two groups. Conclusion: The clinical, imaging, and postoperative complications of the CAL and DM groups were analyzed. The prognosis for DM appears to be more beneficial for early patient recovery, but a higher likelihood of recurrent dislocation is observed. CAL offers excellent stability for primary THA in high-risk patients; however, attention should be given to preventing aseptic loosening.

A new joint reconstruction technique in the treatment of giant cell tumors around the knee: Structural allograft and unicompartmental arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term prognosis of patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a structural allograft or hemiarticular allograft transplantation to treat giant cell tumors (GCTs) around the knee and the prosthesis survival rate were analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 73 patients who were diagnosed with GCTs around the knee and underwent surgery to restore joint function from 2000 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure used for functional knee reconstruction: hemiarticular allograft transplantation or structural allograft and UKA. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to analyze postoperative knee function between the two groups. The Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification system was used to evaluate the progression of osteoarthritis. The incidence of complications and the prosthesis survival rate were also investigated. RESULTS: Patients who underwent UKA to treat GCT demonstrated significantly improved knee function. The rate of an excellent or good KSS was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.041 at the 1-year follow-up, p = 0.033 at the last follow-up). The proportion of severe cases according to WOMAC in the two groups was also different (p = 0.030 at the 1-year follow-up, p = 0.021 at the last follow-up). According to the K-L grade of unaffected compartments, UKA better prevented the progression of osteoarthritis (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GCTs around the knee could benefit from UKA. In addition to providing better knee function and range of motion, UKA could also slow the progression of osteoarthritis in the knee joint. This new surgical method could meet the needs of patients wishing to preserve joint integrity and favorable joint function.

The role of 3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on artificial intelligence technology to different surgeons: A retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative planning with computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensiona (3D) templating has been achieved precise placement of hip components. This study investigated the role of the software (3-dimensional preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty [THA] based on artificial intelligence technology, artificial intelligence hip [AIHIP]) for surgeons with different experience levels in primary THA. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients, who had undergone THA with the help of the AIHIP, and matched to patients, who had undergone THA without the help of the AIHIP, by age and the doctor who operated on them. The subjects were divided into 4 groups, senior surgeon (Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group, senior surgeon without AIHIP group, junior surgeon (Associate Chief of Surgery) with AIHIP group and junior surgeon without AIHIP group. The general data, imaging index, clinical outcomes and accuracy of stem size prediction and cup size prediction were retrospectively documented for all patients. There was a significant difference in discrepancy in leg length (P = .010), neck-shaft angle (P = .025) and femoral offset (P = .031) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P < .001), decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) per 24 hours (P = .046), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P < .050) and postoperative complications (overall P = .035) among the patients in junior surgeon group. No significant differences were found between senior surgeon groups with respect to discrepancy in leg length (P = .793), neck-shaft angle (P = .088)and femoral offset (P = .946) between the healthy side and the affected side, operation duration (P = .085), decrease in Hb per 24 hours (P = .952), intraoperative radiation exposure frequency (P = .094) and postoperative complications (overall P = .378). The stem sizes of 95% were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 97% of the cup size estimates were accurate to within 1 cup size in senior surgeon group with AIHIP. A total of 87% stem sizes were accurately estimated to be within 1 stem size, and 85% cup sizes were accurate to within 1 cup size in junior surgeon group with AIHIP. In conclusion, our study suggests that an AI-based preoperative 3D planning system for THA is a valuable adjunctive tool for junior doctor and should routinely be performed preoperatively.

Risk factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in primary hip arthroplasty patients: a retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF). This was a retrospective cohort study of 108 patients with and 432 control patients without postoperative PFF. Demographic characteristics, surgery-related information (primary hip disease diagnosed, fixation, femoral stem, method of operation, and bone resorption of the proximal femur), and postoperative patient outcomes (hip function, treatment history, and patients' lifestyle behaviors) were recorded and compared between the groups. PFF characteristics, such as the classification, time, and cause, were also documented, and a Cox regression model was built to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative PFF in these patients. Six independent risk factors for postoperative PFF were identified, namely, advanced age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.026, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.007-1.045), femoral neck fracture as the primary disease (HR = 4.536, 95% CI = 2.955-6.961), osteoporosis (HR = 2.043, 95% CI = 1.234-3.383), hemiarthroplasty (or HA, HR = 2.173, 95% CI = 1.327-3.558), bone resorption of the proximal femur (HR = 1.627, 95% CI = 1.090-2.430), and a standard- or long-stem femoral prosthesis (HR = 2.996, 95% CI = 1.480-6.067). The predictive values for a low risk (estimated incidence ≤ 50%), moderate risk (estimated incidence 51%-89%), and high risk (estimated incidence ≥ 90%) of PFF were ≤ 3.0 points, 3.0-10.0 points, and ≥ 10.0 points, respectively. Most patients with postoperative PFF had Vancouver type B fractures. Six independent risk factors for postoperative PFF were identified: advanced age, hip fracture as the primary disease, osteoporosis, HA, bone resorption of the proximal femur, and a long femoral stem.

The diagnostic value of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from patients clinically diagnosed as acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 66 patients with AHO. The test results of mNGS and bacterial culture on different samples, including blood and puncture fluid samples, from patients with AHO were compared to explore the diagnostic value of blood mNGS. Besides, this study also explored the efficacy of blood mNGS in decision making for antibiotic administration and analyzed the factors associated with the positive result of blood mNGS. Results: The most common causative pathogens were Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. The sensitivity of blood mNGS (77.3%) was higher than that of blood culture (42.4%) (P<0.001), while the turnaround time of blood mNGS (2.1 ± 0.4 d) is much less than that of blood culture (6.0 ± 2.1 d) (P<0.001). Besides, the sensitivity of blood mNGS tests (77.3%) was slightly lower than that of puncture fluid mNGS (89.4%). Furthermore, detection comparison at pathogen level unravels that blood mNGS might be suitable for diagnosing AHO caused by common pathogens, while puncture fluid mNGS could be considered as preferred examination in diagnosing AHO caused by uncommon pathogens. Finally, three independent factors associated with the true positive result of blood mNGS in patients with AHO were identified, including Gram-positive pathogens (OR=24.4, 95% CI = 1.4-421.0 for Staphylococcus; OR=14.9, 95%CI= 1.6-136.1 for other Gram-positive bacteria), body temperature at sampling time (OR=8.2, 95% CI = 0.6-107.3 for body temperature of >38.5°C; OR=17.2, 95% CI = 2.0-149.1 for patients who were chilling), and no use of antibiotics before sampling (OR=8.9, 95% CI =1.4-59.0). Conclusion: This is the first report on evaluating and emphasizing the importance of blood mNGS in diagnosing AHO. Blood sample might be an alternative sample for puncture fluid for mNGS, and its extensive application in diagnosing AHO could be expected.

Bone Remodelling of the Proximal Femur After Hip Revision with a Metaphyseal-Fixation Femoral Stem Component.

Background: Whether hip revision with a metaphyseal-fixation femoral stem component can restore the bone mass of the proximal femur remains unclear. The aims of this study were to identify whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur increases following hip revision with a metaphyseal-fixation femoral stem and to identify the factors associated with BMD recovery. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 36 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with a metaphyseal-diaphyseal fixation stem (standard length stem) and had indications for hip revision, which was performed with a proximal press-fit short-stem prosthesis for each patient. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to obtain, evaluate, and compare the BMD at baseline and one year and two years postoperatively. The proximal femur was divided into several independent areas according to the Gruen zone (Gruen 1 to Gruen 7 from the greater trochanter counterclockwise to the lesser trochanter). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential factors significantly associated with an increase in BMD. Results: An increased BMD was obviously identified in the proximal femur. Two years after the surgery, the BMD of the Gruen 1, Gruen 2, Gruen 6, and Gruen 7 areas had increased by 22.6%, 12.6%, 16.2% and 24.2%, respectively, relative to baseline. Three independent risk factors associated with bone mineral density recovery were identified: age (OR=1.100, 95% CI=1.005-1.203, P=0.038), osteoporosis (OR=14.921, 95% CI=1.223-182.101, P=0.034) and fair to poor hip function (OR=13.142, 95% CI=1.024-168.582, P=0.048). Conclusion: This study confirms that metaphyseal-fixation stem hip revision can indeed help restore bone mass in the proximal femur, especially in the Gruen 1, Gruen 2, Gruen 6 and Gruen 7 zones. It was also found that advanced age, osteoporosis, and fair to poor hip joint function were three important risk factors affecting the recovery of proximal femur bone mass after surgery. Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered.

Denosumab Can Prevent Collapse in Patients with Early-Stage Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head by Inhibiting Osteoclasts and Autophagy.

OBJECTIVE: The osteoclastic bone resorption inhibitors might have positive effect in preventing femoral head collapse in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, as a novel osteoclastic inhibitor, whether denosumab can prevent collapse in steroid-induced ONFH remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the treatment effect of denosumab and the potential protective mechanism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 161 patients with steroid-induced ONFH who underwent denosumab treatment were reviewed, and 209 untreated patients were selected as controls. Their clinical characteristics and radiological exam results were obtained. Patients were treated with 60 mg denosumab every 6 months for 2 years. The primary outcome was the incidence of femoral head collapse at 2 years after the initial diagnosis of ONFH. Secondary outcomes included the Harris hip score, progression of osteosclerosis, increase in necrotic area, bone marrow oedema relief, and bone mineral density increase in the femoral head. The Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were performed to identify the differences between the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to identify the factors associated with the treatment effect of denosumab. RESULTS: The incidence of femoral head collapse was 42.24% (68/161) in the denosumab group and 54.07% (113/209) in the control group (χ2  = 5.094, p = 0.024; relative risk = 0.787, 95% CI = 0.627-0.973). The excellent-good rates of the Harris hip score were 63.98% (103/161) in the denosumab group and 44.98% (94/209) in the control group (χ2  = 13.186, p < 0.001). The incidence of osteosclerosis progression in the denosumab group was 55.28% (89/161), which was significantly higher than that in the control group (43.54%, 91/209, χ2  = 5.016, p = 0.025). Meanwhile, a significant increase in bone mineral density was identified in 29.19% (47/161) and 7.18% (15/209) of patients in the denosumab and control groups, respectively (χ2  = 31.600, p < 0.001). The osteoclastic cytoplasm expression of LC3-II was more positive in the control group than in the denosumab group (immunohistochemistry scoring: 3.58 ± 2.27 vs 6.33 ± 2.64, Z = -2.684, p = 0.007). A total of three independent factors were considered to be associated with the positive treatment effect of denosumab, the time of first denosumab administration (OR = 2.010, 95% CI = 1.272-3.177), osteosclerosis (OR = 1.583, 95% CI = 1.024-2.445), and the necrotic area before denosumab administration (medium necrotic area: OR = 2.084, 95% CI = 1.245-3.487; large necrotic area: OR = 2.211, 95% CI = 1.255-3.893). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that denosumab had a positive effect on preventing femoral head collapse in patients with steroid ONFH. This effect might be closely associated with the inhibition of osteoclasts and their autophagy.

The diagnostic value of blood sample NGS in patients with early periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.

The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood samples from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated by comparing it with drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic test. Thirty-six infected patients were diagnosed with PJI according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and 57 volunteers were included in our study. NGS and bacterial culture were chosen to detect PJI after THA. Blood samples and drainage fluid were collected for NGS, and the drainage fluid, which was collected at the same time as the NGS drainage fluid sample, was used for bacterial culture. The primary outcomes of interest were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the infection group, 31 patients showed positive results by blood sample NGS, 33 patients showed positive results by drainage fluid NGS, and 17 patients showed positive bacterial culture results. In the control group, the results of 2 blood sample NGS, 16 drainage fluid NGS, and 3 bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the blood sample were 0.86, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the drainage fluid samples were 0.92, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of bacterial culture were 0.47, 0.95, and 0.79, respectively. The study demonstrated that both the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were higher than those of bacterial culture, regardless of the kind of sample. Compared with drainage fluid NGS, the sensitivity of blood sample NGS was slightly lower (0.86 vs 0.92), but blood sample NGS showed higher specificity (0.96 vs 0.72). In total, the diagnostic value of blood sample NGS was superior to that of drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The majority of infected patients could be identified by blood sample NGS. Moreover, because of its high specificity, blood sample NGS can not only detect infectious bacteria but also distinguish infectious from non-infectious bacteria, which is dramatically different from using drainage fluid NGS.

Multi-omics analysis reveals cuproptosis and mitochondria-based signature for assessing prognosis and immune landscape in osteosarcoma.

Background: Osteosarcoma (OSA), the most common primary mesenchymal bone tumor, is a health threat to children and adolescents with a dismal prognosis. While cuproptosis and mitochondria dysfunction have been demonstrated to exert a crucial role in tumor progression and development, the mechanisms by which they are regulated in OSA still await clarification. Methods: Two independent OSA cohorts containing transcriptome data and clinical information were collected from public databases. The heterogeneity of OSA were evaluated by single cell RNA (scRNA) analysis. To identify a newly molecular subtype, unsupervised consensus clustering was conducted. Cox relevant regression methods were utilized to establish a prognostic gene signature. Wet lab experiments were performed to confirm the effect of model gene in OSA cells. Results: We determined 30 distinct cell clusters and assessed OSA heterogeneity and stemness scRNA analysis. Then, univariate Cox analysis identified 24 candidate genes which were greatly associated with the prognosis of OSA. Based on these prognostic genes, we obtained two molecular subgroups. After conducting step Cox regression, three model genes were selected to construct a signature showing a favorable performance to forecast clinical outcome. Our proposed signature could also evaluate the response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy of OSA cases. Conclusion: We generated a novel risk model based on cuproptosis and mitochondria-related genes in OSA with powerful predictive ability in prognosis and immune landscape.

Efficacy of bed exercise in elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study of 539 patients.

The purpose of this study was to observe the necessity of bed exercise therapy in the rehabilitation of elderly patients after hip replacement and to analyze whether bed exercise therapy has an impact on patients' psychological scores, hip function and postoperative complications. From January 2018 to January 2021, a total of 539 patients with end-stage femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis were retrospectively analyzed. According to the method of postoperative rehabilitation exercise, patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (routine gait) and Group B (bed exercise). There was no significant difference in general information between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in baseline pain scores between patients in Group A and Group B (25.2 ±â€…9.6 vs 24.8 ±â€…10.4, P = .429). However, at 5 weeks post-operatively, the pain scores of patients in Group A were significantly higher than those in Group B (38.6 ±â€…7.7 vs 34.1 ±â€…8.1, P = .016). At 17 weeks post-operatively, the difference between Group A and Group B remained (40.9 ±â€…6.9 vs 37.5 ±â€…7.5, P = .041). Similar to the pain score, the hip function score compared between the 2 groups was significantly different at 5 weeks (39.7 ±â€…8.4 in Group A, 45.9 ±â€…9.2 in Group B, P < .001) and 17 weeks post-operatively (41.5 ±â€…7.6 in Group A, 47.2 ±â€…8.8 in Group B, P < .001). At 17 weeks post-operatively, between the 2 groups, only the range of motion (ROM) of abduction showed no significant difference. Patients in Group B exhibited a better ROM in any other movement posture. The results showed that compared with Group A, bed exercise rehabilitation training could reduce the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. This study demonstrates that bed exercise can improve the hip function and quality of life of elderly patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an early postoperative stage. It can reduce the incidence of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs after surgery. For these patients, systematic bed exercise rehabilitation training is recommended in the early postoperative period.

Comparison of minimally-invasive fibular supporting of T-type with traditional bloody iliac flap metastasis for osteonecrosis of the femoral head at ARCO stage II.

Purpose: Our research mainly evaluates the clinical efficacy of two surgical methods in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) at ARCO stage II, aiming to provide optimal hip-preserving treatment of ONFH. Method: From October 2018 to September 2020, 48 patients (59 hips) met the inclusion criteria and randomized. 24 cases (29 hips) in experimental group were treated with minimally-invasive fibular supporting of T-type; 24 cases (30 hips) in control group were treated with traditional bloody iliac flap metastasis. We will compare some intraoperative and postoperative conditions. Result: The operation time in experimental group was 37 (6) minutes, in control group was 130 (21.75) minutes; the length of surgical incision in two groups was 3.7 (0.7) cm and 12.85 (2.68) cm. The intraoperative blood loss in two groups was 69 (21) ml and 363 (87) ml; the postoperative VAS score of the experimental group on day 1, day 3, day 7 after surgery was 5.5 (2), 3.5 (1), 0 (1); the control group was 6 (1.75), 4 (1), 3 (1). The data differences between above groups have statistically significant. The follow-up time of two groups was (33.86 ± 5.66) months and (35.67 ± 4.69) months. The bone graft healing time in two groups was (14.21 ± 1.93) months and (13.83 ± 2.34) months. The Harris hip scores of two groups at the last follow-up were 90 (7.5) and 86.5 (8.5). The survival rates of two groups were 79.31% (23/29) and 76.67% (23/30). The difference was no statistically significant in above groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The two different bone graft implantation showed satisfactory early outcomes. Compared to the control group, the experimental group has the advantages of lesser pain, lesser blood loss, lesser trauma and shorter operation time. It may be a choice as bone graft for the treatment of ONFH at early stage.

Retrospective Study from a Single Center to Identify Risk Factors Associated with Reinfection in Patients Undergoing 2-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND This study identified risk factors associated with reinfection and created a scoring system designed for patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) who have undergone prosthetic resection and spacer implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent 2-stage revision for PJI from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: infection recurrence and infection cure. Demographic and clinical information, laboratory test results, and radiological images that were potentially associated with infection were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS Seven independent risk (protective) factors for infection recurrence in patients with PJI who underwent 2-stage hip revision surgery were identified: C-reactive protein level, type of bacterial infection, age, immunosuppression, albumin/globulin ratio, glucose level, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Finally, a weighted scoring system of 100-mark system was established and the area under the curve was 0.965 (95% confidential interval=0.947-0.983). The predictive scores for low risk (≤30%), moderate risk (31-69%), and high risk (≥70%) of infection recurrence were ≤45, 46-77, and ≥78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For patients with PJI who had already undergone joint resection and spacer implantation, this newly established scoring system might help determine the accurate risk of infection recurrence after a definitive new prosthesis implantation. Patients with scores greater than 78 points would be considered very likely to have an infection recurrence. Therefore, the second-stage revision surgery should be changed to an additional anti-infection treatment or a debridement surgery instead of a definitive prosthesis implantation surgery.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving stems: a comparison between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach.

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) are two of the most common surgical approaches used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) worldwide. The curved anatomical collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem was designed to preserve the bone of the femoral neck and allow physiologic load transfer along the trabecular systems, which may better restore hip biomechanics, improve triplanar stem stability and improve the long-term survival rate. We believe this study will demonstrate whether the DAA is suitable for THA with CFP stems. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent primary THA with CFP stems from January 2010 to December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. These patients were divided into two groups (group A, DAA; group B, PA). The approach was selected by the surgeon. The demographic characteristics, preoperative diagnoses, preoperative Harris hip score, preoperative range of motion, postoperative complications, and radiologic measurements (neck-shaft angle, coronal alignment, sagittal alignment, stress shielding, anteversion, neck-preserving ratio, acetabular anteversion, acetabular inclination angle, acetabular depth, anterior-posterior offset, lateral offset, difference in leg length) were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: In this study, a total of 248 patients (185 male and 63 female) were included. No significant differences were found between group A and group B in terms of general patient information and radiologic measurements. However, the rate of nerve injury in group A (7/5.5%) was significantly higher than that in group B (1/0.8%) (p = 0.037). At 1 month after surgery, we found a significant difference between the two groups in the Harris hip score (HHS) (71.03 ± 8.04 in group A, 68.39 ± 8.37 in group B, P = 0.014) and forgotten joint score (FJS-12) (50.78 ± 7.57 in group A, 47.68 ± 7.34 in group B, P = 0.001). At 1 year after surgery, the mean FJS-12 score in group A (68.78 ± 7.54) was higher than that in group B (58.84 ± 8.91) (P < 0.001). At 5 years after surgery, the mean FJS-12 score in group A (73.38 ± 7.21) was higher than that in group B (67.16 ± 9.12) (P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis of the 1-month, 1-year, and 5-year postoperative FJS-12 scores using multiple linear regression analysis revealed that an excellent HHS led to good patient satisfaction at each time point. CONCLUSION: In summary, unlike a "standard" femoral stem, whose alignment might be affected by the surgical approach, alignment of the CFP stem is independent from the surgical approach. Even though the DAA had a higher nerve injury rate, nerve injury from the DAA did not typically cause severe dysfunction of the lower extremity. Therefore, decisions regarding the surgical approach for patients undergoing THA with CFP stems can be made primarily based on the preference of the surgeon.

Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In total, 316 hips treated from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A typical preoperative planning process for patients was implemented to compare the accuracy of the two preoperative planning methods with respect to prosthetic size and position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the homogeneity between the actual prosthetic size and position and the preoperative planning method. RESULTS: When AI-HIP software and manual templating were used for preoperative planning, the stem agreement was 87.7% and 58.9%, respectively, and the cup agreement was 94.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The results showed that when AI-HIP software was used, an extremely high level of consistency (ICC > 0.95) was achieved for the femoral stem size, cup size, and femoral osteotomy level (ICC = 0.972, 0.962, and 0.961, respectively). CONCLUSION: AI-HIP software showed excellent reliability for predicting the component size and implant position in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients with Hip Dysplasia Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Prostheses.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the potential risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients who were diagnosed with DDH and undergoing THA (by artificial joint replacement) at our hospital from January 1999 to December 2019 were included in this study. Clinical and radiological factors were obtained from their medical records, such as age, sex, Crowe classification, morphological features of proximal femur, and features of surgical procedure. The outcome of interest was the occurrence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture, which was recorded and classified according to the Vancouver classification system. According to the fracture status, the patients were divided into two groups: the fracture group and the non-fracture group. Multivariate logistic regression model was built to identify the risk factors for these fractures. RESULTS: A total of 1252 hips were finally included. Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified in 62 hips. The incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with DDH undergoing THA was 4.95%. There were 22 patients (proportion = 35.48%, incidence = 1.76%) with Type A fractures, 38 (proportion = 61.29%, incidence = 3.04%) with Type B fractures, and two (proportion = 3.23%, incidence = 0.16%) with Type C fractures. Six independent risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified: osteoporosis (OR = 3.434; 95% CI, 1.963-6.007), previous surgical history (OR = 4.797; 95% CI, 2.446-9.410), Dorr Type A canal (OR = 3.025; 95% CI, 1.594-5.738), retained femoral neck length (OR = 1.121; 95% CI, 1.043-1.204), implanted metaphyseal-diaphyseal fixation stems (OR = 3.208; 95% CI, 1.562-6.591), and implanted stem with anteversion design (OR = 2.916; 95% CI, 1.473-5.770). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with DDH undergoing THA was 4.95%, which was at a moderate level compared to patients with other diseases undergoing THA. Six independent risk factors were identified: osteoporosis, previous surgical history, Dorr Type A canal, insufficient neck osteotomy level, implantation of metaphyseal-diaphyseal fixation stem, and implantation of a stem with an anteversion design. Comprehending these risk factors might help surgeons prevent the occurrence of these intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with DDH.

Short uncemented femoral component for hip revision: prognosis and risk factors associated with failure.

BACKGROUND: The application of short femoral stems is partially restricted in revision surgery. This study will demonstrate the therapeutic effect and unsuitable situation for short stem revision. METHODS: Demographic characteristics of all patients were recorded in detail (Table 1). Anteroposterior view radiographic examinations of proximal femur are necessary before and after the operation for patients. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate of the femoral stem at the final follow-up. Risk factors for failure were also investigated. The secondary outcomes of interest included the Harris hip score, excellent to good rate and incidence of complications. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparisons between continuous variables. The chi-square test was performed for comparisons between categorical variables. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and the failure of revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients with short stems were retrospectively reviewed. There were 188 males and 193 females. The average age and body mass index before revision surgery were 58.85 ± 13.46 years and 23.72 ± 3.40 kg/m2, respectively. The mid-term survival rate of the short femoral component was 94.23%. The prognosis and complications of patients between the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the Harris score, complication incidence or survival rate of the femoral component. The strongest risk factor in this study was intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery (HR = 5.477, 95% CI = 2.156-13.913). CONCLUSION: Three risk factors for failure were identified: ageing, osteoporosis and intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture during revision surgery. Therefore, a short femoral stem should be implanted in patients with these risk factors with additional caution.

As an unusual traumatic presentation, acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture: a retrospective case series of 18 patients.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture has been suggested as an unusual traumatic presentation and rarely reported in the literature. The aims of this study were (1) to identify the etiological characteristics, (2) to summarize the treatment strategy, and (3) to present the mid- to long-term results of patients with this rare traumatic presentation. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 18 patients (15 males, 3 females; mean age = 42.77 ± 17.74 years, range = 16 to 87 years) who were diagnosed and treated for simultaneous acetabular fracture and ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture were included. Injury mechanisms, fracture classifications, and treatment strategies were noted. To assess functional status, the Harris score was used. To evaluate pain intensity, visual analogous scale (VAS) was used. The reduction quality of acetabular fractures was examined as per Matta's standard. Postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10.04 ± 3.38 (range = 6.2 to 16 years). The most common injury mechanism was traffic accident, followed by falling from a tall height. As per the Evans classification, intertrochanteric fractures were defined as type 3 in 13 patients, type 2 in one patient, and type 4 in 4 patients. In acetabular fracture site, the most common fractures were posterior wall fractures, followed by anterior column fractures. All patients received internal fixation for their intertrochanteric fractures. Ten out of 18 patients also received internal fixation for their acetabular fracture. However, for the remaining patients, acetabular fractures were treated conservatively or with fracture fragment resection. Bony healing was achieved in all but one patient who died postoperatively. Twelve patients achieved excellent and good results (Harris score ≥ 80 points) whereas five patients achieved fair and poor results (Harris score < 80 points). The proportion of patients who achieved an excellent-good Harris score was 70.6%. Dislocation of the hip was found to be an independent risk factor (HR = 9.194, 95% CI = 1.024-82.515) for the poor patient outcome. CONCLUSION: To sum up, high-impact trauma is the main cause of acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture. For patients who have undergone surgical treatment, fracture healing is usually achieved. However, the occurrence of complications, especially avascular necrosis, is the major cause of a poor prognosis. Dislocation of the hip joint at the time of injury is considered to be an important risk factor for a poor prognosis.

Diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, classification and total hip arthroplasty in patients with long-term unreduced hip joint dislocation, secondary osteoarthritis and pseudoarthrosis.

BACKGROUND: Neglected long-term unreduced hip joint dislocation with secondary osteoarthritis and pseudoarthrosis poses a great challenge to hip surgeons. However, as this is an uncommon injury, few studies have systematically investigated these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients from 2010 to 2017. The diagnostic values of three different types of common radiological examinations were evaluated. We evaluated the bone conditions of the original acetabulum and classified the patients into three types (four subtypes). The surgical procedures and prognosis of the patients were also investigated. RESULTS: With the combined application of X-ray, CT scans and 3D reconstruction, 93.8% of these patients (sensitivity = 93.8%, Youden's index = 0.93, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95) could be diagnosed correctly. There were 6/16 (37.5%) type A patients, 4/16 (25.0%) type B1 patients, 5/16 (31.3%) type B2 patients and 1/16 (6.3%) type C patient. For patients with type A injury, the surgical procedures for total hip arthroplasty were similar to "standard" total hip arthroplasty. For patients with type B injury, due to atrophy or partial bone deficiency of the original acetabulum, the surgical procedure for total hip arthroplasty was probably similar to those for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. For patients with type C injury, the situation was similar to that of revision surgery. The average Harris hip score postoperatively was 89.94 ± 5.78 points (range: 79-98 points). CONCLUSIONS: The new classification system could help surgeons estimate potential difficulties during total hip arthroplasty. The prognosis of most patients after total hip arthroplasty is expected to be excellent or good.

Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND This study examined a cohort of patients who underwent bilateral THAs. CFP prostheses and ribbed prostheses were each used on both sides. We assessed the midterm clinical, radiological, and bone remodeling outcomes around prosthesis of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2009 to January 2013, 53 patients were enrolled in our study. We clinically evaluated all patients by recording Harris hip and Oxford hip scores. Some radiological indicators of the femoral prosthesis position were measured. Periprosthetic bone remodeling was assessed via bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. RESULTS The mean preoperative HHS of the CFP group and ribbed group were no significantly different (P=0.570). The neck-shaft angle in the ribbed group was significantly greater than in the CFP group (P<0.001). The CFP group had a greater offset (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in leg-length discrepancy (P=0.727) or Engh score between the 2 groups at the last follow-up (P=0.858). The preoperative BMD was increased at the last follow-up in Gruen zones 3 and 5 (P<0.05) and decreased in Gruen zones 1 and 7 (P<0.05) on the CFP side. BMD was increased in Gruen zone 4 (P=0.007) on the ribbed side. Pearson correlations and rate of complications were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS Both the CFP and ribbed stem significantly improved the preoperative HHSs and OHSs. The bone remodeling of the CFP stem was more concentrated in the middle and distal regions of the prosthesis, while that of the ribbed stem was more concentrated in the proximal portion of the prosthesis.

Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes and performance of the collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co., Hamburg, Germany) and the Tri-Lock stem (DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN, USA) in terms of femoral offset (FO) and leg length reconstruction. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with either a CFP stem or Tri-Lock stem from January 2016 to March 2017 were compared (65 and 57 patients, respectively). The Harris hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were recorded. The FO, femoral vertical offset, and neck-shaft angle were measured at the last follow-up. The occurrence of dislocation and periprosthetic fracture during the follow-up period was recorded. RESULTS: The CFP stem induced significantly more FO than did the Tri-Lock stem on the operated side than contralateral side (3.63 ± 4.28 vs. 0.83 ± 5.46 mm). Significantly fewer patients had a >5-mm decrease in FO on the unaffected side in the CFP stem group (n = 1) than Tri-Lock stem group (n = 10). CONCLUSION: Both stems similarly improved hip function and reconstructed the leg length, but the CFP stem was superior to the Tri-Lock stem in reconstructing FO.