Measuring visceral fat with water-selective suppression methods (SPIR, SPAIR) in patients with metabolic syndrome.

We attempted to measure the area and volume of visceral fat using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to avoid radiation exposure. We used water suppression-spectral attenuation with inversion recovery (WS-SPAIR) as prepulses and conducted T(1) high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE). Image processing software can be used to estimate the area and volume of fat and separate the fat and water signals at a visually optimal threshold in the MR image, which requires contrast enhancement between intestinal contents and visceral fat. In 14 volunteers, we evaluated WS-SPAIR and water suppression-spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (WS-SPIR) with respect to the relationship between the flip angle of THRIVE and signal contrast. We used flip angles of 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 20 degrees. The minimum threshold that allowed exclusion of intestinal contents from the masked region was determined for each technique. The volume and area of the masked region, which included subcutaneous fat, were measured at the umbilicus level. Both volume and area increased with a smaller flip angle. The masked region was larger with WS-SPIR-THRIVE (flip angle 5 degrees ). The size of the masked region was determined according to the minimum threshold that allowed exclusion of the intestinal contents from the masked region, expressing the contrast between the intestinal contents and fat in a relative manner. It was speculated that by separating the signals at the threshold, WS-SPIR-THRIVE (flip angle 5 degrees) was a more suitable technique for measuring the area and volume of visceral fat.

[Usefulness of the sagittal section imaging technique in whole-heart coronary MRA(WHCA)].

Whole-heart coronary MRA(WHCA)was performed in transaxial and sagittal sections in random order in 10 healthy volunteers to obtain coronal section multiplanar reconstruction(MPR)at an interval of 0.5 mm and thickness of 1 mm for evaluation. Visual evaluation showed sagittal section imaging to be superior to transaxial section imaging in 12 out of a total of 20 regions in the left and right proximal coronary arteries. Sagittal section imaging was found to be superior to transaxial section imaging in evaluation of the hepatic left lobe in all the cases as well as in evaluation of the right peripheral coronary arteries in 8 of 9 cases that could be evaluated. For quantitative evaluation, the difference in brightness between the peripheral adipose tissues(S fat)and the coronary arteries(S coronary)was assigned as CR(S coronary/S fat). Highly comparable results were obtained by quantitative and visual evaluation. Phantom experimentation was performed. The piston of the syringe was substituted for the diaphragm. Ghost artifact caused by movement of the diaphragm and phase return, i.e., the slice phase-encoding direction of the 3D sequence, were the origin of poor images in transaxial section imaging. We thus conclude that sagittal section imaging is useful in WHCA as a 3D sequence.

MR measurement of visceral fat: assessment of metabolic syndrome.

One diagnostic criterion for metabolic syndrome is obesity from the accumulation of visceral fat; others include abdominal circumference and area of visceral fat as measured by computed tomography (CT) at the umbilical level. We evaluated visceral fat using frequency-selective excitation magnetic resonance (MR) imaging SPAIR (spectral attenuation with inversion recovery) water suppression THRIVE (3D T1-high resolution isotropic volume examination). Fifty of 70 slices with 2-mm interval were used to render and measure volume of visceral fat ranging within 10 cm of the umbilicus; the area of visceral fat at the umbilical level was also measured. Imaging was completed using breath hold within 14 s. Image processing was easier than using CT.