ABSTRACT
Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of tears and ocular surface that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability leading to decrease of vision, productivity and quality of life, and blindness. DED diagnosis remains difficult and underdiagnosed regarding inconsistency between subjective symptoms and clinical findings. Tear break-up time (TBUT) is an objective indicator of tear film stability in diagnostic DED. A novel smartphone attachment, namely SEC (smart eye camera), could mimic conventional slit lamp to assess TBUT and beneficial in facilitating DED diagnosis. Reliability between a non and an ophthalmologist in TBUT assessment and DED diagnosis is observed in this study. Purpose: To determine interobserver reliability of TBUT measurement for diagnosing DED using SEC. Design: This a cross-sectional analytic study involving 99 participants (198 eyes) aged 40 years who visited Pratama Gema Santi Hospital, Nusa Penida, from September 2nd to 4th, 2022, with consecutive sampling technique. Methods: Fluoresceined eyes were filmed using the SEC device and apps, continued by masked ophthalmologist and resident assessing TBUT based on the video. The primary outcome is interobserver reliability for TBUT measurement and DED diagnosis. Results: The mean age of participants was 55.22±9.78 years, 48.5% male and 51.5% female. The reliability of interobserver in assessing DED based on TBUT test is 0.78 (95% CI=0.31-1.26, P-value=0.001), and interobserver reliability in diagnosing DED based on OSDI and TBUT showed good agreement (weighted kappa=0.71). Good interobserver reliability underscores that non-ophthalmologists can diagnose DED based on TBUT video using SEC. Conclusion: SEC video has good interobserver reliability to assess TBUT for DED diagnosis. SEC can be used as one of the methods in assessing DED in limited health care facilities. The high reliability of interobserver assessment indicates that DED diagnosis using video taken with SEC may be useful for telemedicine evaluation in remote areas.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Corneal erosion is common in eye emergency cases. Extensive corneal erosions result in severe pain and prolonged healing time. This study aimed to compare bandage contact lenses with pressure patching in terms of reducing the size of the erosion area, pain scale in patients with corneal erosion and its complications. DESIGN: A randomized open-label clinical trial was conducted. METHODS: Subjects with mechanical corneal erosion were selected to use either bandage contact lenses or pressure patching. All subjects received antibiotic eye drops and 0.5% tropicamide eye drops. Evaluations were done 24 and 72 hours after treatment. The size of the corneal erosion area, pain scale, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 32 eyes (16 eyes in each group) were studied. The change in the size of the corneal erosion area was greater in the bandage contact lens group than in the pressure patching group, although there was no significant difference. In the bandage contact lens group, 56.25% of the eyes were healed at 24 hours and 43.75% were healed at 72 hours. In the pressure patching group, 62.50% were healed at 24 hours and 12.50% were healed at 72 hours. The change in pain scale was significantly greater in the bandage contact lens group than in the pressure patching group. No complications were found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bandage contact lenses are an effective alternative to treating mechanical corneal erosion because of their effect in reducing pain without causing any complications.
