Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Phys ; 27(12): 2688-92, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11190951

ABSTRACT

An improved method for an easy, rapid measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera is presented. A simplified model was previously developed based solely on mean and standard deviation measurements taken from a region of interest in bar pattern images. This led to an estimate of the modulation transfer function and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). The improved method involved expanding the simplified model to incorporate input modulation, square wave input versus the assumed sinusoidal input, aperture (pixel) size, and scatter from the plastic in the bar pattern. The input square wave modulation was calculated to be unity for the typical bar patterns used for gamma camera quality control assessment. For the typical range of bar sizes available, in combination with the typical resolving capabilities of gamma cameras, the sinusoidal approximation of the bar pattern was found to be valid (<1% contribution to the measured resolution from higher harmonic frequencies present in a square wave input with an effective input modulation greater than unity by a factor of 4/pi). The aperture correction factor was calculated for numerous bar and pixel size combinations. Applying the aperture correction factor results in an improvement in the accuracy of the calculated FWHM values, especially for large apertures (pixel sizes). For a camera with a specified FWHM value of 3.5 mm, the simplified model predicts values ranging from 3.2 to 4.1 mm, when the acquisition matrix varies from 128(2) to 512(2). When the expanded model is used with the aperture correction applied, this range was reduced to 3.6-3.9 mm. The scatter correction further improved the calculated FWHM (from 3.6 to 3.8 mm). It is suggested that the expanded model should be used when more accurate measurements are desired, such as in acceptance testing.


Subject(s)
Gamma Cameras , Radiology/instrumentation , Radiology/methods , Algorithms , Models, Statistical , Models, Theoretical , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons , Scattering, Radiation , Software , Technetium/pharmacokinetics
2.
J Nucl Med ; 40(6): 942-55, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10452309

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Global spatial normalization transforms a brain image so that its principal global spatial features (position, orientation and dimensions) match those of a standard or atlas brain, supporting consistent analysis and referencing of brain locations. The convex hull (CH), derived from the brain's surface, was selected as the basis for automating and standardizing global spatial normalization. The accuracy and precision of CH global spatial normalization of PET and MR brain images were evaluated in normal human subjects. METHODS: Software was developed to extract CHs of brain surfaces from tomographic brain images. Pelizzari's hat-to-head least-square-error surface-fitting method was modified to fit individual CHs (hats) to a template CH (head) and calculate a nine-parameter coordinate transformation to perform spatial normalization. A template CH was refined using MR images from 12 subjects to optimize global spatial feature conformance to the 1988 Talairach Atlas brain. The template was tested in 12 additional subjects. Three major performance characteristics were evaluated: (a) quality of spatial normalization with anatomical MR images, (b) optimal threshold for PET and (c) quality of spatial normalization for functional PET images. RESULTS: As a surface model of the human brain, the CH was shown to be highly consistent across subjects and imaging modalities. In MR images (n = 24), mean errors for anterior and posterior commissures generally were <1 mm, with SDs < 1.5 mm. Mean brain-dimension errors generally were <1.3 mm, and bounding limits were within 1-2 mm of the Talairach Atlas values. The optimal threshold for defining brain boundaries in both 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (n = 8) and 15O-water (n = 12) PET images was 40% of the brain maximum value. The accuracy of global spatial normalization of PET images was shown to be similar to that of MR images. CONCLUSION: The global features of CH-spatially normalized brain images (position, orientation and size) were consistently transformed to match the Talairach Atlas in both MR and PET images. The CH method supports intermodality and intersubject global spatial normalization of tomographic brain images.


Subject(s)
Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Software , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
3.
Ann Oncol ; 9(1): 71-7, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9541686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF) is an endogenous peptide responsible for the secretion and synthesis of corticosteroids. In animal models of peritumoral brain edema, hCRF has significant anti-edematous action. This effect, which appears to be independent of the release of adrenal steroids, appears mediated by a direct effect on endothelial cells. We conducted a feasibility and phase I study with hCRF given by continuous infusion to patients with brain metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peritumoral brain edema documented by MRI and the use of either no steroids or stable steroid doses for more than a week were required. MRIs were repeated at completion of infusion and estimations by dual echo-image sequence (Proton density and T2-weighted images) of the amount of peritumoral edema were performed. The study was performed in two stages. In the feasibility part, patients were randomized to receive either 0.66 or 1 microgram/kg/h of hCRF or placebo over 24 hours. The second part was a dose finding study of hCRF over 72 hours at escalating doses. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled; only one was receiving steroids (stable doses) at study entrance; dose-limiting toxicity (hypotension) was observed at 4 micrograms/kg/h x 72 hours in two out of four patients, while zero of five patients treated at 2 micrograms/kg/h developed dose-limiting toxicities. Flushing and hot flashes were also observed. Improvement of neurological symptoms and/or exam were seen in 10 patients. Only small changes were detected by MRI. Improvement in symptoms did not correlate with changes in cortisol levels, and changes in cortisol levels were not correlated with changes in peritumoral edema. CONCLUSIONS: hCRF is well tolerated in doses up to 2 micrograms/kg/h by continuous infusion x 72 hours. Hypotension limits administration of higher doses. The observation of clinical benefit in the absence of corticosteroids suggests hCRF may be an alternative to steroids for the treatment of patients with peritumoral brain edema. Further exploration of this agent in efficacy studies is warranted.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Brain Edema/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/complications , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Adrenal Glands/physiology , Adrenalectomy , Brain Edema/diagnosis , Brain Edema/etiology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
4.
Med Phys ; 24(2): 327-34, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9048375

ABSTRACT

An easy and rapid method for the measurement of the intrinsic spatial resolution of a gamma camera was developed. The measurement is based on the first and second statistical moments of regions of interest (ROIs) applied to bar phantom images. This leads to an estimate of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of a line spread function (LSF). Bar phantom images were acquired using four large field-of-view (LFOV) gamma cameras (Scintronix, Picker, Searle, Siemens). The following factors important for routine measurements of gamma camera resolution with this method were tested: ROI placement and shape, phantom orientation, spatial sampling, and procedural consistency. A 0.2% coefficient of variation (CV) between repeat measurements of MTF was observed for a circular ROI. The CVs of less than 2% were observed for measured MTF values for bar orientations ranging from -10 degrees to +10 degrees with respect to the x and y axes of the camera acquisition matrix. A 256 x 256 matrix (1.6 mm pixel spacing) was judged sufficient for routine measurements, giving an estimate of the FWHM to within 0.1 mm of manufacturer-specified values (3% difference). Under simulated clinical conditions, the variation in measurements attributable to procedural effects yielded a CV of less than 2% in newer generation cameras. The moments method for determining MTF correlated well with a peak-valley method, with an average difference of 0.03 across the range of spatial frequencies tested (0.11-0.17 line pairs/mm, corresponding to 4.5-3.0 mm bars). When compared with the NEMA method for measuring intrinsic spatial resolution, the moments method was found to be within 4% of the expected FWHM.


Subject(s)
Gamma Cameras/standards , Biophysical Phenomena , Biophysics , Fourier Analysis , Phantoms, Imaging , Technology, Radiologic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL