Comparison of topical permethrin 5% vs. benzyl benzoate 25% treatment in scabies: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Scabies is a pruritic parasitic infestation of the skin. High-income countries have reported an increasing incidence over the last few years. Studies have indicated a reduction in the sensitivity of scabies mites to the standard treatment of choice, topical permethrin 5%. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in a head-to-head manner the efficacy of two topical scabicides [permethrin 5% and benzyl benzoate 25% (BB)] in the treatment of scabies using the same administration modality; and to address potential confounding factors such as incorrectly performed treatment and hygiene measures. METHODS: In total, 110 patients with dermoscopy-verified scabies infestation were enrolled and randomized into two equally sized groups in a double-blinded manner. Fifty-five received topical permethrin 5% and 55 received topical BB 25%, both for daily use over a period of three consecutive days. Treatment outcome was evaluated by dermoscopy at a 3-week follow-up visit. RESULTS: Treatment resulted in a dermoscopy-verified cure rate of 27% in the permethrin group and 87% in the BB group. The tolerability and safety profile of permethrin 5% cream was excellent, while the BB emulsion produced a burning sensation in 43% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Topical permethrin demonstrated a lack of efficacy in the majority of scabies cases, whereas BB demonstrated an excellent cure rate and reasonable tolerability. Considering the reduced sensitivity of scabies mites to permethrin 5%, our results suggest that BB is an appropriate first-line therapy in the treatment of scabies.

Vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: VEGF proteins and their receptors are involved in tumor vessel neoformation. The third VEGF receptor, VEGFR3 (flt-4) is important during both blood vessel development and lymphatic vessel formation. Because HNSCC preferentially metastasizes to regional lymph nodes, we investigated the expression of VEGFR3 and its ligand VEGF-C in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas by semiquantitative RT-PCR (4 HNSCC cells lines and 6 HNSCC specimens) and by immunohistochemistry (18 HNSCC specimens). VEGFR3 protein expression was confirmed by Western blotting in four HNSCC cell lines and six HNSCC specimens. RESULTS: Semiquantitative mRNA analysis showed VEGF-C mRNA expression in three (SCC9, SCC25, LFFR) of four HNSCC cell lines and all six HNSCC specimens. VEGFR3 mRNA was found in two HNSCC cell lines (JPPA and SCC25) and only weakly detected in the other two HNSCC cell lines (SCC9 and LFFR). High amounts of VEGFR3 mRNA were shown in all six patients' tumor specimens. VEGFR3 Western blot analysis yielded a distinct band at the predicted size of 210 kD in JPPA and SCC9 and hardly detectable bands in SCC25 and LFFR cell lines. All six HNSCC specimens displayed strong VEGFR3 protein bands. Immunohistochemistry in 18 HNSCC specimens assigned strong to mediate VEGF-C IR and minor VEGFR3 IR to tumor cells and strong VEGF-C and VEGFR3 IR to tumor surrounding vessels. In addition, intense VEGF-C immunostaining was observed on perivascular and mononuclear cells in the tumor surrounding stroma. Subtyping of VEGFR3+ microvascular tumor vessels revealed partially double immunolabeling with CD34 and flk-1, indicating a common origin of blood and lymphatic vessels. The expression of VEGF-C on tumor cells could be correlated with recurrences, and larger primary tumors had more VEGF-C-positive vessels. CONCLUSIONS: The broad expression of VEGF C and VEGFR3 in HNSCC suggests involvement in tumor lymph angiogenesis and vascular angiogenesis, promoting tumor growth and propagation of cancer cells. This implies that inhibitors of lymph angiogenesis could become effective therapeutic options similar to classical angiogenesis inhibitors.