Evaluation of a professional development experience designed to equip school support staff with skills to facilitate youth mental health promotion.

Background: Public policy across the world is increasingly focusing on the role of mental health promotion in whole of health strategies. There is a growing evidence-base that mental health promotion, delivered by trained facilitators, is effective in promoting self-awareness and self-care to prevent the damaging effects of ongoing stress in one's life and to promote early detection of any possible emerging mental health problems. Within Australia, however, few clinicians or school staff are confident or trained in mental health promotion.Aims: This paper reports the results of a two-day training designed for facilitators of a mental health program for secondary-school students. The goal was to develop facilitators' knowledge and understanding of best practice in youth mental health promotion and to increase their confidence in delivering the program.Design: A mixed methods evaluation assessed the impact that a solution-focused training program had on participating facilitators.Methods: A questionnaire was created and included eight quantitative items and one open ended, qualitative question. Twenty-seven nurses and guidance officers from central Queensland were recruited via convenience sampling and data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.Results: The evaluation revealed that participants' perception of their ability to facilitate a youth mental health program significantly improved after completing the training. Qualitative data indicated that participants found the professional development experience to be valuable, provide useful and transferable skills, and believed it to be necessary for mental health promotion work.Conclusion: By providing detailed description of the program's content and processes, other mental health professionals may be inspired to further develop effective learning experiences.

Involving mental health service users in suicide-related research: a qualitative inquiry model.

AIM: To describe the research model developed and successfully deployed as part of a multi-method qualitative study investigating suicidal service-users' experiences of mental health nursing care. BACKGROUND: Quality mental health care is essential to limiting the occurrence and burden of suicide, however there is a lack of relevant research informing practice in this context. Research utilising first-person accounts of suicidality is of particular importance to expanding the existing evidence base. However, conducting ethical research to support this imperative is challenging. DISCUSSION: The model discussed here illustrates specific and more generally applicable principles for qualitative research regarding sensitive topics and involving potentially vulnerable service-users. CONCLUSION: Researching into mental health service users with first-person experience of suicidality requires stakeholder and institutional support, researcher competency, and participant recruitment, consent, confidentiality, support and protection. IMPLICATIONS: Research with service users into their experiences of sensitive issues such as suicidality can result in rich and valuable data, and may also provide positive experiences of collaboration and inclusivity. If challenges are not met, objectification and marginalisation of service-users may be reinforced, and limitations in the evidence base and service provision may be perpetuated.

Less haste more speed: factors that prolong the interval from presentation to diagnosis in some cancers.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, the GP is the gatekeeper to specialist services in addition to many other roles. Recently, the GP is also expected to select cases that warrant 'urgent' as opposed to 'routine' specialist investigation. Failure to refer on the appropriate timetable may have implications for timely diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the circumstances in which the diagnosis of cancer is delayed with reference to the primary care records and by a structured investigation of clinical records in one practice. METHODS: The study was set in an urban group practice serving a mixed population of deprived and affluent communities. List size was 10 440 patients, with five whole time equivalent partners and three practice nurses. The appointment system was fully computerized and there were no personal lists. Records for all cases with specified common cancers diagnosed since 1990 and still registered in the practice were reviewed. The interval from presentation to referral, referral to diagnosis and presentation to diagnosis was compared for a series of factors including 'urgent' referral. The clinical team currently working in the practice conducted a structured review of the case records for the most delayed cases. RESULTS: Fifty-four cases were listed in the practice. A series of factors were identified as having a bearing on delayed diagnosis, including a reticence on the part of patients to seek to expedite specialist appointments, failures of communication, and patients presenting multiple problems in short general practice consultations. The action plan agreed by the clinical team includes improving the quality of communication with secondary care, follow-up of patients who have been referred for radiological or ultrasound investigation and reviewing patients who fail to attend specialist clinics. CONCLUSIONS: The data imply that delays sometimes result from avoidable errors before and after referral and especially by the patient entering secondary care on the wrong pathway. Improving the patients' experience in health care requires the provider to take a global view of the service. Primary care is not merely a filter but influences and is influenced by policies in other parts of the health care system.