The impact of regional STEMI systems on protocol use and quality improvement initiatives in community hospitals without cardiac catheterization laboratories.

Study objective: Since the 1990s, national guidelines have recommended hospitals develop STEMI treatment protocols and monitor quality. A 2003 survey of Minnesota hospitals without cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL) found <2/3 had STEMI protocols, <50% had a quality assessment (QA) process, and protocols in existence were incomplete. We evaluated temporal changes in STEMI processes in relationship to changes in mortality. Design setting and participants: Follow-up surveys were mailed to emergency departments at 108 Minnesota hospitals without CCL. Results: Among 87% of responding hospitals, 89% had formal protocols or guidelines for STEMI management compared to 63% in 2003 (p < 0.001). In 2010, 67% of hospitals had triage/transfer criteria and 15% of hospitals used protocols for transfer decisions, compared to only 8% (p < 0.001) and 1% (p = 0.098), respectively, in 2003. The percentage of hospitals transferring patients with STEMI from the emergency department increased from 23% in 2003 to 56% in 2010 (p < 0.001). During this time, age-adjusted acute MI mortality rate in Minnesota decreased 33% and was more pronounced in areas with regional STEMI systems. Conclusions: Since 2003, utilization of STEMI guidelines, protocols, and standing orders in Minnesota hospitals without CCL has markedly improved with <10% of hospitals lacking specific STEMI management protocols. The majority of hospitals routinely transfer patients with STEMI for primary PCI and have comprehensive QA processes. This improvement was stimulated by regional STEMI systems, further supporting the current class I recommendation for STEMI systems of care in current guidelines. The decline in Minnesota STEMI mortality paralleled the growth of regional STEMI systems.

Case 274: Cardiac Echinococcus.

HistoryA 47-year-old Sudanese man without a known remarkable medical history presented to the emergency department for a syncopal episode. The patient denied chest pain, dyspnea, focal weakness, or prior similar episodes. He was originally from north Sudan and eventually moved to Saudi Arabia, where he worked as a farm manager before emigrating to the United States years ago. Physical examination findings and routine laboratory values, including complete blood count and basic metabolic panels, were normal. Electrocardiography revealed nonspecific T-wave inversions, and a series of cardiac biomarkers were negative. A contrast material-enhanced CT angiography pulmonary embolism protocol and cardiac MRI were performed for further evaluation.

Case 274.

History A 47-year-old Sudanese man without a known remarkable medical history presented to the emergency department for a syncopal episode. The patient denied chest pain, dyspnea, focal weakness, or prior similar episodes. He was originally from north Sudan and eventually moved to Saudi Arabia, where he worked as a farm manager before emigrating to the United States years ago. Physical examination findings and routine laboratory values, including complete blood count and basic metabolic panels, were normal. Electrocardiography revealed nonspecific T-wave inversions, and a series of cardiac biomarkers were negative. A contrast material-enhanced CT angiography pulmonary embolism protocol and cardiac MRI were performed for further evaluation (Figs 1-4). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text].

The Left Main Bifurcation Angle and Changes Throughout the Cardiac Cycle: Quantitative Implications for Left Main Bifurcation Stenting and Stents.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the left main (LM) bifurcation angles and their changes throughout the cardiac cycle. BACKGROUND: LM stenting is an accepted alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the LM bifurcation has great anatomic variability. Three-dimensional angles and their cyclic changes are important for coronary stenting. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for chest pain were scanned and analyzed in three-dimensional views for left main-left anterior descending (LM-LAD), left main-left circumflex (LM-LCX), and left anterior descending-left circumflex (LAD-LCX) angles and their cyclic changes. Calculations and assessment of angles, angular variability, and how these angles change throughout the cardiac cycle were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-four patient scans were analyzed. The median end-diastolic LM-LCX angle was 130° and the LAD-LCX was 74°. Median end-systolic angle for the LM-LCX was 133°, and LAD-LCX was 69°. Large differences were found across all three absolute angles (LM-LCX, LAD-LCX, LM-LAD). Marked variability also occurred in how these angles changed throughout the cardiac cycle. CONCLUSIONS: LM bifurcation geometry in patients shows marked absolute angle variability, as does diastolic-systolic angle movement. LM bifurcation stents should accommodate wide interpatient bifurcation angles at rest for both the LM-LAD and LM-LCX angles.

Satisfaction with emergent transfer for percutaneous coronary interventions on patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and their families.

BACKGROUND: Transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to fibrinolysis if performed in a timely manner but frequently requires dislocation of patients and their families from their local community. Although patient satisfaction is increasingly viewed as an important quality indicator, there are no data on how emergent transfer for PCI affects patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and their families. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Minneapolis Heart Institute's Level 1 Regional ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction program is designed to facilitate emergent transfer for PCI in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from 31 rural and community hospitals. To determine the effect of emergent transfer, questionnaires were given to 152 patients and their families who survived to hospital discharge with a 65.8% response rate (mean age, 63.9 years; 29% women). Ninety-five percent of patients felt the reasons and process of transfer were well explained, and 97% felt transfer for care was necessary. Despite this, 15% of patients would have preferred to stay in their local hospital. The majority of the families felt the transfer process (88%) and family member's condition (94%) were well explained. Although 99% felt it was necessary for their family member to be transferred for specialized care, 11% of families still would have preferred that their family members remain at the local community hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients and families can be informed, even in time-critical situations, about the transfer process for PCI and understand the need for specialized care. Still, a significant minority would prefer to stay at their local hospital, despite acknowledging transfer for PCI provided optimal care.

Causes of delay and associated mortality in patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction systems are being developed to improve timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). System delays may diminish the mortality benefit achieved with primary PCI in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients, but the specific reasons for and clinical impact of delays in patients transferred for PCI are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, observational study of 2034 patients transferred for primary PCI at a single center as part of a regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction system from March 2003 to December 2009. Despite long-distance transfers, 30.4% of patients (n=613) were treated in ≤ 90 minutes and 65.7% (n=1324) were treated in ≤ 120 minutes. Delays occurred most frequently at the referral hospital (64.0%, n=1298), followed by the PCI center (15.7%, n=317) and transport (12.6%, n=255). For the referral hospital, the most common reasons for delay were awaiting transport (26.4%, n=535) and emergency department delays (14.3%, n=289). Diagnostic dilemmas (median, 95.5 minutes; 25th and 75th percentiles, 72-127 minutes) and nondiagnostic initial ECGs (81 minutes; 64-110.5 minutes) led to delays of the greatest magnitude. Delays caused by cardiac arrest and/or cardiogenic shock had the highest in-hospital mortality (30.6%), in contrast with nondiagnostic initial ECGs, which, despite long treatment delays, did not affect mortality (0%). Significant variation in both the magnitude and clinical impact of delays also occurred during the transport and PCI center segments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment delays occur even in efficient systems for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care. The clinical impact of specific delays in interhospital transfer for PCI varies according to the cause of the delay.