Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Invest Radiol ; 37(5): 241-7, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11979149

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of the new liver-specific x-ray contrast agent, Dy-EOB-DTPA, in rabbits with VX2 liver tumors by spiral computed tomography (CT) in comparison to iopromide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The time course of liver enhancement was determined in five groups of two normal anesthetized rabbits, which received intravenous injections of Dy-EOB-DTPA before anesthesia at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg. Fifteen, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes after administration spiral CT images were obtained and the attenuation in the livers were determined. A second group of ten rabbits with implanted VX2 tumors received in a random crossover design either Dy-EOB-DTPA at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg or, 1 day later, iopromide at a dose of 600 mg iodine/kg. CT images were obtained 60 minutes after Dy-EOB-DTPA administration and both in the arterial and portal-venous phases after iopromide injection. Three radiologists evaluated the images. The rabbits were killed, and their livers were investigated histologically for liver tumors. RESULTS: In normal animals, 0.5 mmol/kg Dy-EOB-DTPA resulted in a liver enhancement of 30 HU during the whole observation period of 90 minutes. In tumor-bearing animals, histology revealed 14 implanted tumors of 3-20 mm diameter. Sixty-five percent of the tumors were below 10 mm. Dy-EOB-DTPA was able to detect 13 tumors (93%), iopromide 11 (79%) both in the arterial and in the portal-venous phase. The difference was statistically not significant. In plain CT, seven tumors (50%) were found (P < 0.01 vs iopromide and Dy-EOB-DTPA). One scar and two sites of necrosis were detected by each of the methods. CONCLUSION: Dy-EOB-DTPA injection at a dose of 0.5 mmol/kg resulted in a long-lasting detectability of 93% of all implanted tumors versus 79% found with iopromide.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Pentetic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Pentetic Acid/administration & dosage , Animals , Contrast Media/pharmacokinetics , Injections, Intravenous , Iohexol/administration & dosage , Liver/metabolism , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/metabolism , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology , Molecular Structure , Pentetic Acid/chemistry , Pentetic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Rabbits , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...