ABSTRACT
The cooperative enzyme reaction rates predicted by the bi-substrate Hill equation and the bi-substrate Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) equation when allosterically inhibited are compared in silico. Theoretically, the Hill equation predicts that when the maximum inhibitory effect at a certain substrate condition has been reached, an increase in allosteric inhibitor concentration will have no effect on reaction rate, that is the Hill equation shows allosteric inhibitor saturation. This saturating inhibitory effect is not present in the MWC equation. Experimental in vitro data for pyruvate kinase, a bi-substrate cooperative enzyme that is allosterically inhibited, are presented. This enzyme also shows inhibitor saturation, and therefore serves as experimental evidence that the bi-substrate Hill equation predicts more realistic allosteric inhibitor behaviour than the bi-substrate MWC equation.
Subject(s)
Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Enzymes/chemistry , Models, Biological , Models, Chemical , Models, Molecular , Substrate Specificity , Catalysis , Computer Simulation , Enzyme Activation , Enzyme Inhibitors/metabolism , Enzymes/metabolismABSTRACT
The evaluation of a generic simplified bi-substrate enzyme kinetic equation, whose derivation is based on the assumption of equilibrium binding of substrates and products in random order, is described. This equation is much simpler than the mechanistic (ordered and ping-pong) models, in that it contains fewer parameters (that is, no K(i) values for the substrates and products). The generic equation fits data from both the ordered and the ping-pong models well over a wide range of substrate and product concentrations. In the cases where the fit is not perfect, an improved fit can be obtained by considering the rate equation for only a single set of product concentrations. Due to its relative simplicity in comparison to the mechanistic models, this equation will be useful for modelling bi-substrate reactions in computational systems biology.
