Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Acad Radiol ; 23(12): 1604-1609, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27374700

ABSTRACT

Breast density has been shown to be a strong, independent risk factor for breast cancer. Unfortunately, mammography is less accurate on dense breast tissue compared to fattier breast tissue. Multiple studies suggest a solution to this by demonstrating the ability of supplemental screening ultrasound to detect additional malignant lesions in women with dense breast tissue but negative mammography. In particular, supplemental screening ultrasound may be beneficial to women with dense breast tissue and intermediate or average risk for breast cancer, women in specific ethnic populations with greater prevalence of dense breast tissue, and women living in resource-poor healthcare environments. Although magnetic resonance imaging is currently recommended for women with high risk for breast cancer, not all women can access or tolerate a magnetic resonance imaging examination. Notably, ultrasound does not require intravenous gadolinium and may be an alternative for women with socioeconomic or medical restrictions, which limit their access to magnetic resonance imaging. Limitations of supplemental screening ultrasound include a substantial rate of false-positives, increased cost, and limited resource availability, particularly in regard to the time required for image interpretation. Additional clinical experience with this application of ultrasound, improved patient selection criteria, and new technology, such as the promising results seen with automated whole breast ultrasound, may address these limitations. In light of recent legislation in some states that has called for discussing supplemental imaging with patients who have dense breast tissue, the optimal role for supplemental screening ultrasound merits further exploration.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast/pathology , Breast Density/physiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(1): 128-32, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23010730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for both risk reduction and cancer is increasing. In the cancer setting, most studies suggest the use of both clinical and intraoperative biopsy criteria in patient selection. This study examines the use of both biopsy and clinical criteria in women undergoing total nipple-removing mastectomy. METHODS: The study consisted of 58 patients undergoing total mastectomy without nipple sparing. Biopsies of the subareola tissue (SA), proximal nipple (NC) contents and radial sections of the residual nipple (NR) were examined microscopically. Tumor size and distance from the nipple were also noted. RESULTS: Using clinical criteria alone, the false negative rate was 53.8% and a false positive rate of 44.4%. When adding subareola and nipple core biopsies to clinical criteria the false negative rate fell to 7.7% but the false positive rate remained at 44.4%. When using only SA and NC biopsies to predict occult nipple involvement, the false negative rate was 11.8%. In 4 cases the NC was positive while the SA was negative for cancer and in 6 cases the SA was positive and NC negative. In 2 cases both the NC and SA biopsies were negative while the NR was positive. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a more limited role in the use of clinical criteria for evaluating patients for NSM. This maximizes the number of patients who are candidates for NSM with minimal risk of nipple involvement. It was also noted that intraoperative biopsies are not totally reliable in predicting occult nipple involvement.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Nipples/pathology , Patient Selection , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Organ Sparing Treatments , Predictive Value of Tests
3.
J Ultrasound Med ; 21(8): 861-5; quiz 867-8, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12164571

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the color Doppler sonographic features of endometrial masses with histologic characteristics and microvessel density. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 10 postmenopausal and 5 premenopausal women with abnormal bleeding who had color Doppler sonography and histologic studies of endometrial masses. RESULTS: Endometrial masses that contained multiple branches on color Doppler sonography were more likely carcinomas, even though both polyps and carcinomas were vascular on color Doppler sonography and their microvessel densities were similar. On color Doppler sonography, polyps averaged 1.2 detectable vessels versus 3.4 for carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Color Doppler sonography may be useful in distinguishing carcinomas from polyps in women with thickened endometria.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid/diagnostic imaging , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Endometrium/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...