Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Jt Dis Relat Surg ; 35(2): 354-360, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727115

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare cranial bone ossification between patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and healthy individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2021 and April 2022, a total of 60 healthy female individuals (median age: 24.5 months; range, 18 to 36 months) and 56 female DDH patients (median age: 23 months; range, 18 to 35 months) were included. Age, head circumference, weight, height, and patency of the anterior fontanel were measured in groups. Percentiles were classified as very low, low, normal, high and very high. All patients were female and those with abnormal thyroid function test, vitamin D, calcium, phosphate and alkaline phosphatase values were not included in the study. For those diagnosed with DDH, they were included in the group regardless of the type of treatment. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of age and weight (p>0.05). The very low and very high head circumferences were more frequent, and the normal head circumferences were less frequent in the DDH group (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of fontanel closure (p>0.05). In open fontanels, no significant difference was found in both groups in terms of age (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed no significant difference between the fontanel ossifications of children with and without DDH; however, we found that the ossification of the skull bones of children with DDH was different compared to healthy children.


Subject(s)
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Osteogenesis , Skull , Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Infant , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/surgery , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/pathology , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/diagnostic imaging , Skull/pathology , Skull/growth & development , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Osteogenesis/physiology , Case-Control Studies
2.
Dermatol Pract Concept ; 13(3)2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37557131

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sunlight is the major source of vitamin D, thus, the use of sunscreens could result in vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess serum vitamin D levels in healthy children aged 0-18 years in the winter season and determine the association between sunscreen use and sun protection behaviors on vitamin D status. METHODS: The demographic data, clothing style, skin type, history of sunburn, history of visiting seaside towns in summer, sun protection behaviors including sunscreen use, wearing sunglasses and hats, and further detailed information about sunscreen use were recorded. Vitamin D status was assessed by measuring blood levels of total 25(OH)D during winter. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-six children (172 boys and 204 girls) with a mean age of 128.38±56.39 months were enrolled. The mean serum level of 25(OH)D was 15.32±8.64 ng/mL. The mean values of vitamin D were associated with age, sex, traditional clothing style, having a sunburn history, and sunscreen use (P < 0.05). Adolescents and girls had vitamin D deficiency and inadequacy more than younger children and boys (P < 0.05). Sunscreen use in the adequacy group was lower than in the inadequacy and deficiency groups (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between vitamin D status according to the sunscreen details (sun protection factor, product source, season, and body areas) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sunscreen use appears to reduce vitamin D levels measured in winter. Children, especially girls and adolescents, should be exposed to sufficient sunlight to maintain normal serum vitamin D levels. Vitamin D supplementation should be given to children, especially during winter.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...