Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 45(4): 246-249, 2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825932

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPPemph), apart from bullous pemphigoid, is a rare bullous dermatosis that can be induced by programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The primary location of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced LPPemph has previously only been reported at the nonfollicular dermal-epidermal junction. We present a case of nivolumab-induced LPPemph with an intense perifollicular lichenoid reaction, prominent multifocal perifollicular clefting, which in addition, was also accompanied by linear IgG and C3 immunofluorescence deposits along the dermal-epidermal junction as well as demonstrating a perifollicular pattern. Intriguingly, the serological study of BP180 and BP230 antibodies was negative, suggesting the presence of additional novel antibodies, which primarily favor hair follicles and may contribute to the pathogenesis. Therefore, we consider this entity a novel variant of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced bullous dermatosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that highlights perifollicular bullae accompanied by immunofluorescence findings in a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced lesion. We propose a new immunotherapy associated entity, lichen planopilaris pemphigoides, and emphasize the significance of perifollicular changes in the pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Lichen Planus , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous , Humans , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Lichen Planus/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
4.
Cutis ; 93(3): 162-5, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24738099

ABSTRACT

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) is an uncommon, locally aggressive cutaneous neoplasm that usually presents as a slow-growing, asymptomatic lesion on the head or neck. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma frequently is misdiagnosed due to its histologic appearance on superficial biopsy specimens mimicking other follicular neoplasms. Herein, we highlight a case in which a slow-growing lesion was initially diagnosed as a trichoadenoma following superficial biopsy; however, after surgical excision the pathology revealed a locally aggressive MAC.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Skin Appendage/pathology , Carcinoma/pathology , Facial Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Sweat Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans
5.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 130(6): 831-4, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16740036

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Dermatofibroma is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor composed of a mixture of fibroblastic and histiocytic cells. The diagnosis of this tumor is generally uncomplicated; however, rare variants may be difficult to distinguish from malignant fibrohistiocytic tumors. Deep penetrating dermatofibroma may be difficult to distinguish from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, and pseudosarcomatous dermatofibroma and dermatofibroma with monster giant cells share morphologic similarities with malignant fibrous histiocytoma and atypical fibroxanthoma. OBJECTIVE: To find an immunohistochemical marker or markers that differentiate between fibrohistiocytic lesions of skin. DESIGN: We evaluated the immunophenotypic characteristics of 83 fibrohistiocytic tumors (36 typical dermatofibromas, 16 cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, 16 malignant fibrous histiocytomas, and 15 atypical fibroxanthomas) using antibodies against MIB-1 (Ki-67), factor XIIIa, CD34 (HPCA-1), HHF35 (muscle-specific actin), 1A4 (smooth muscle actin), cytokeratin (AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2, and 34betaE12), S100 protein, and desmin. RESULTS: A high proliferative index detected by MIB-1 staining excluded the possibility of dermatofibroma and was diagnostically useful in separating this entity from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. A low proliferative index, however, could not differentiate dermatofibroma from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Factor XIIIa reactivity was not helpful for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma, whereas CD34 reactivity was statistically significant in the diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. The sensitivity of these 2 markers is low and therefore of questionable practical diagnostic value. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the proliferative index may further assist in distinguishing dermatofibroma from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, atypical fibroxanthoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma.


Subject(s)
Histiocytoma, Benign Fibrous/pathology , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biopsy , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Dermatofibrosarcoma/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Histiocytoma, Benign Fibrous/classification , Histiocytoma, Benign Fibrous/metabolism , Histiocytoma, Malignant Fibrous/pathology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Skin Neoplasms/classification , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Xanthomatosis/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...