Babies born with ambiguous genitalia: Developing an educational resource for Australian midwives.

PROBLEM AND BACKGROUND: The birth of a baby with ambiguous genitalia is rare and usually unexpected. Parents often receive inconsistent language from health-professionals after the birth. Initial interaction with the birth team has long-term consequences for families with babies born with ambiguous genitalia. AIM: Understand the current practices on the day of birth and explore knowledge gaps for midwives regarding babies born with ambiguous genitalia. Develop educational content that can enable midwives to respond appropriately when the sex of a baby is unclear. METHODS: This study included two phases, utilising qualitative descriptive research design with semi-structured interviews to understand the experiences of midwives caring for babies with ambiguous genitalia and their families. The findings informed the development a midwifery educational resource using these qualitative findings. FINDINGS: Our analysis of 14 interviews with Australian midwives identified that they had no formal education to support families with a baby with ambiguous genitalia. Emotional support, advocacy and medical information translation were areas midwives perceived as essential skills to support these families. DISCUSSION: Midwives provide a unique role in parental birth experiences. Themes that arose emphasised their psychosocial support role but lacked formal education and guidance on this topic. Midwives had learnt from the media about babies born with ambiguous genitalia and wanted evidence-based education to support parents. Midwife education focusing on both psychosocial and clinical care for parents and their baby with ambiguous genitalia is crucial. CONCLUSION: Midwives can play a pivotal role in supporting parents with a baby with ambiguous genitalia. Themes from this qualitative study informed the development of a midwifery education digital resource.

Premature Ovarian Insufficiency in CLPB Deficiency: Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Phenotypic Insights.

CONTEXT: Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a common form of female infertility that usually presents as an isolated condition but can be part of various genetic syndromes. Early diagnosis and treatment of POI can minimize comorbidity and improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the genetic cause of syndromic POI, intellectual disability, neutropenia, and cataracts. METHODS: We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) followed by functional validation via RT-PCR, RNAseq, and quantitative proteomics, as well as clinical update of previously reported patients with variants in the caseinolytic peptidase B (CLPB) gene. RESULTS: We identified causative variants in CLPB, encoding a mitochondrial disaggregase. Variants in this gene are known to cause an autosomal recessive syndrome involving 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, neurological dysfunction, cataracts, and neutropenia that is often fatal in childhood; however, there is likely a reporting bias toward severe cases. Using RNAseq and quantitative proteomics we validated causation and gained insight into genotype:phenotype correlation. Clinical follow-up of patients with CLPB deficiency who survived to adulthood identified POI and infertility as a common postpubertal ailment. CONCLUSION: A novel splicing variant is associated with CLPB deficiency in an individual who survived to adulthood. POI is a common feature of postpubertal female individuals with CLPB deficiency. Patients with CLPB deficiency should be referred to pediatric gynecologists/endocrinologists for prompt POI diagnosis and hormone replacement therapy to minimize associated comorbidities.

Role of cross-campus multidisciplinary team meetings in decision-making for children and adolescents with differences of sex development/intersex.

AIM: Management of children with differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) is complex with limited evidence to guide clinical decisions. Regular multidisciplinary team meetings were set up in Sydney and Melbourne paediatric hospitals to enable systematic peer review of complex decision-making. We aim to describe the workload and role of these meetings. METHODS: The multidisciplinary team forum includes invited representatives from endocrinology, urology, gynaecology, genetics, psychology, social work, clinical ethics, laboratory and hospital executive and meetings occur 1-3 times monthly. Descriptive data were collected from de-identified meeting referrals and minutes between August 2012 to August 2018 (Sydney) and January 2014 to August 2018 (Melbourne). RESULTS: A total of 192 referrals (142 new and 50 follow-ups) aged 1 week to 17 years were discussed across the two sites. 46, XY DSD (n = 81) was the most common sub-classification. Consideration of surgical options and optimal management of gonads with malignant potential were amongst the common reasons for referral to the multidisciplinary team meetings. Surgical interventions were considered but not recommended after review for 38 of 154 (24.7%) procedures. Gonad retention to allow potential functional benefit was recommended in 15/46 (32.6%) referrals. Evidence of premalignant or malignant changes was found in 20/57 (35%) gonads removed, with dysgenetic features and atrophy/streak features in 6 (10.5%) and 27 (47.4%) gonads respectively. CONCLUSION: Formal DSD multidisciplinary team meetings provide a framework and opportunity for multi and interdisciplinary discussions amongst representatives from several specialities to help make complex decision-making.