Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Older Adults.

Background Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed in older adults (age ≥75 years) with stable ischemic heart disease. However, little is known about clinical outcomes. Methods and Results We derived a cohort of older adults undergoing elective PCI for stable ischemic heart disease across a large health system. We compared 12-month event-free survival (freedom from all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding), all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, and bleeding events for patients receiving complex versus noncomplex PCI and derived risk estimates with Cox regression models. We included 513 patients (mean age, 81±5 years). Patients receiving complex PCI versus noncomplex PCI did not significantly differ across a host of clinical characteristics including cardiovascular disease features, noncardiac comorbidities, guideline-directed medical therapy use, and frailty. Patients receiving complex PCI versus noncomplex PCI experienced worse event-free survival (80.4% versus 86.8%), which was not significant in adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 [95% CI, 0.88-2.16]). All-cause death at 1 year for patients undergoing complex PCI was nearly double that seen for patients receiving noncomplex PCI (10.2% versus 5.9%), and the risk was significant in models adjusted for clinical characteristics (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.02-3.79]). Target lesion revascularization risk was lower for patients receiving complex PCI (2.2% versus 3.5%, adjusted HR), but bleeding events were not statistically different between groups (25.3% versus 20.5%; P=0.19). Conclusions Complex PCI in older adults with stable ischemic heart disease was associated with lower risk of target lesion revascularization but higher all-cause death compared with noncomplex PCI.

Readmission rates and risk factors for readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine readmission rates and predictors of hospital readmission following TAVR in patients with ESRD. BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: We assessed index hospitalizations for TAVR from the National Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2018 and used propensity scores to match those with and without ESRD. We compared 90-day readmission for any cause or cardiovascular cause. Length of stay (LOS), mortality, and cost were assessed for index hospitalizations and 90-day readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of 90-day readmission. RESULTS: We identified 49,172 index hospitalizations for TAVR, including 1,219 patients with ESRD (2.5%). Patient with ESRD had higher rates of all-cause readmission (34.4% vs. 19.2%, HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.68-2.30, p<0.001) and cardiovascular readmission (13.2% vs. 7.7%, HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.44-2.38, p<0.001) at 90 days. During index hospitalization, patients with ESRD had longer length of stay (mean difference 1.9 days), increased hospital cost (mean difference $42,915), and increased in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs. 0.9%). Among those readmitted within 90 days, patients with ESRD had longer LOS and increased hospital charge, but similar in-hospital mortality. Diabetes (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.31-2.64) and chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.18) were independently associated with higher odds of 90-day readmission in patients with ESRD. CONCLUSION: Patients with ESRD undergoing TAVR have higher mortality and increased cost associated with their index hospitalization and are at increased risk of readmission within 90 days following TAVR.

In-hospital outcomes and readmission in older adults treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for stable ischemic heart disease.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) in older adults requires a meticulous assessment of procedural risks and benefits, but contemporary data on outcomes in this population is lacking. Therefore, we examined the risk of near-term readmission, bleeding, and mortality in high-risk cohort of older adults undergoing inpatient PCI for SIHD. METHODS: We analyzed the National Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2018 to identify index hospitalizations in which PCI was performed for SIHD. Patients were stratified into those ≥ 75 years old (older adults) and those < 75 years old. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge. RESULTS: A total of 74,516 patients underwent inpatient PCI for SIHD, of whom 24,075 were older adults. Older adult patients had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.68-2.38), intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.24-3.34), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.43-2.07) during index hospitalization, with longer LOS and in-hospital charge. Older adults also experienced a higher hazard of 90-day readmission for any cause (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.57-1.66) and cardiovascular causes (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.77-1.91). CONCLUSION: Older adults undergoing inpatient PCI for SIHD were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality, periprocedural morbidities, higher cost, and readmissions compared with younger adults. Understanding these differences may improve shared decision-making for patients with SIHD being considered for PCI.

Choice of antihypertensive agent in isolated systolic hypertension and isolated diastolic hypertension: A secondary analysis of the ALLHAT trial.

Despite broad treatment recommendations, there are limited published reports comparing the efficacy of different antihypertensive agents in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension. This study was a secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. We compared the use of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril on the primary outcome of combined coronary heart disease, stroke, or all-cause mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension.

Prognosticating brain tumor patient survival after laser thermotherapy: Comparison between neuroradiological reading and semi-quantitative analysis of MRI data.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Given increasing interest in laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) to treat brain tumor patients, we explored if examining multiple MRI contrasts per brain tumor patient undergoing surgery can impact predictive accuracy of survival post-LITT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI contrasts included fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1 pre-gadolinium (T1pre), T1 post-gadolinium (T1Gd), T2, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), susceptibility weighted images (SWI), and magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE). The latter was used for MRI data registration across preoperative to postoperative scans. Two ROIs were identified by thresholding preoperative FLAIR (large ROI) and T1Gd (small ROI) images. For each MRI contrast, a numerical score was assigned based on changing image intensity of both ROIs (vs. a normal ROI) from preoperative to postoperative stages. The fully-quantitative method was based on changing image intensity across scans at different stages without any human intervention, whereas the semi-quantitative method was based on subjective criteria of cumulative trends across scans at different stages. A fully-quantitative/semi-quantitative score per patient was obtained by averaging scores for each MRI contrast. A standard neuroradiological reading score per patient was obtained from radiological interpretation of MRI data. Scores from all 3 methods per patient were compared against patient survival, and re-examined for comorbidity and pathology effects. RESULTS: Patient survival correlated best with semi-quantitative scores obtained from T1Gd, ADC, and T2 data, and these correlations improved when biopsy and comorbidity were included. CONCLUSION: These results suggest interfacing neuroradiological readings with semi-quantitative image analysis can improve predictive accuracy of patient survival.