Direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration: translating evidence into action.

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence that direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration reduces complications, but this practice is not universal in Australia and New Zealand. AIMS: To describe the current utilisation and logistical barriers to the use of direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration by respiratory physicians from Australia and New Zealand, and to determine the cost benefits of procuring equipment and training resources in chest ultrasound. METHODS: We surveyed all adult respiratory physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand regarding their use of direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration. We performed a cost-benefit analysis for acquiring bedside ultrasound equipment and estimated the capacity of available ultrasound training. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six of 275 respiratory physicians responded (53% response). One-third (33.6%) of respondents do not undertake direct ultrasound localisation. Lack of training/expertise (44.6%) and lack of access to ultrasound equipment (41%) were the most frequently reported barriers to performing direct ultrasound localisation. An average delay of 2 or more days to obtain an ultrasound performed in radiology was reported in 42.7% of respondents. Decision-tree analysis demonstrated that clinician-performed direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration is cost-beneficial, with recovery of initial capital expenditure within 6 months. Ultrasound training infrastructure is already available to up-skill all respiratory physicians within 2 years and is cost-neutral. CONCLUSION: Many respiratory physicians have not adopted direct ultrasound localisation for pleural aspiration because they lack equipment and expertise. However, purchase of ultrasound equipment is cost-beneficial, and there is already sufficient capacity to deliver accredited ultrasound training through existing services.

Clinical utility of sequential venous blood gas measurement in the assessment of ventilatory status during physiological stress.

BACKGROUND: Venous blood gases (VBG) are commonly utilised, particularly in the emergency setting, to assess and monitor patients at risk of ventilatory failure with limited evidence regarding their clinical utility in the assessment of ventilatory status over time. AIMS: This study aims to assess agreement between arterial and venous pH and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) both before and after physiological stress, at each time point, and within the same subject between paired samples before and after bronchoscopy. METHODS: Prospective study of 30 patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy under conscious sedation. Paired arterial and venous samples taken before and after bronchoscopy were analysed utilising descriptive statistics and bias plot (Bland-Altman) analysis to assess limits of agreement. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, post-bronchoscopy arterial blood gas and VBG showed reduced pH (-0.05 ± 0.05 and -0.04 ± 0.04 respectively) and increased arterial and venous pCO2 (5.9 ± 6.7 and 3.5 ± 5.5 mmHg respectively), the differences being statistically significant (P = 0.035). There was statistical agreement between arterial blood gas and VBG parameters; however, the limits of agreement were wide at rest and, for pCO2, widened further post-bronchoscopy. CONCLUSION: Sequential VBG provide an unpredictable means for assessing pCO2 in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Previously noted poor agreement between arterial and venous pCO2 worsens following physiological stress, with sequential VBG likely to underestimate changes in ventilatory status in patients with acute respiratory compromise, suggesting limited utility as a means for monitoring changes in ventilation.