Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Case Rep Womens Health ; 34: e00402, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35242601

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This report presents an unusual case of severe post-coital abdominal pain and signs of hemorrhagic shock requiring admission to a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and emergent laparoscopy. This case was unique given the timing and progression of the patient's symptoms, as well as her age, surgical history, and symptomatic progression. Here we document the notable characteristics and treatment of this patient. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient presented to a local emergency department with signs progressive peritonitis and shock after an episode of non-traumatic intercourse. Her initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed signs of free fluid in the abdomen around the bladder and liver with no definitive source of bleed. She developed worsening shock with severe pain. She was then emergently transferred to a tertiary care center for evaluation by gynecology service and for general trauma surgery evaluation. She was further stabilized in the emergency department, and then admitted to the surgical critical care service. Following additional imaging, she received exploratory surgery with gynecology to control a hemorrhagic ruptured cyst. She remained stable and was discharged the next day. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrated a complication of an often-benign diagnosis, revealing the potential danger of underestimating this chief complaint, as well as the importance of understanding how minimal trauma can lead to cyst rupture.

2.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 25(1): 46-54, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33054530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if COVID-19 was associated with a change in patient refusals after Emergency Medical Services (EMS) administration of naloxone. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in which the incidence of refusals after naloxone administration in a single EMS system was evaluated. The number of refusals after naloxone administration was compared across the before-pandemic interval (01/01/20 to 02/15/20) and the during-pandemic interval (03/16/20 to 04/30/20). For comparison the incidence of all other patient refusals before and during COVID-19 as well as the incidences of naloxone administration before and during COVID-19 were also reported. RESULTS: Prior to the widespread knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic, 24 of 164 (14.6%) patients who received naloxone via EMS refused transport. During the pandemic, 55 of 153 (35.9%) patients who received naloxone via EMS refused transport. Subjects receiving naloxone during the COVID-19 pandemic were at greater risk of refusal of transport than those receiving naloxone prior to the pandemic (RR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.6-3.76). Among those who did not receive naloxone, 2067 of 6956 (29.7%) patients were not transported prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2483 of 6016 (41.3%) were not transported during the pandemic. Subjects who did not receive naloxone with EMS were at greater risk of refusal of transport during the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to it (RR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.32-1.46). CONCLUSION: In this single EMS system, more than a two-fold increase in the rate of refusal after non-fatal opioid overdose was observed following the COVID-19 outbreak.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...